Skip to main content
Log in

Covering the staple line with polyglycolic acid sheet versus oxidized regenerated cellulose mesh after thoracoscopic bullectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare coverage with oxidized regenerated cellulose mesh and that with polyglycolic acid sheet to decrease the incidence of postoperative recurrent pneumothorax.

Methods

From August 2010 to August 2014, a total of 112 patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax undergoing thoracoscopic bullectomy were enrolled. We compared the clinicopathological characteristics between recurrent and non-recurrent cases and examined their association with the material used for visceral pleural coverage: polyglycolic acid sheet versus oxidized regenerated cellulose mesh.

Results

57 patients underwent thoracoscopic bullectomy plus coverage using oxidized regenerated cellulose mesh and 55 underwent thoracoscopic bullectomy plus coverage using polyglycolic acid sheet. The recurrence rate among all patients was 13.3%. No severe postoperative complications were observed in either group. There were no significant differences in the perioperative outcomes. However, the postoperative recurrence rate was significantly higher in the oxidized regenerated cellulose mesh group than in the polyglycolic acid sheet group (22.8 vs 3.6%).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that coverage with oxidized regerated cellulose mesh was not superior to coverage with polyglycolic acid sheet for postoperative recurrent pneumothorax.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PSP:

Primary spontaneous pneumothorax

PGA:

Polyglycolic acid

ORC:

Oxidized regenerated cellulose

References

  1. Sahn SA, Heffner JE. Spontaneous pneumothorax. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:868–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sadikot RT, Greene T, Meadows K, et al. Recurrence of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Thorax. 1997;52:805–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Horio H, Nomori H, Kobayashi R, Naruke T, Suemasu K. Impact of additional pleurodesis in video-assisted thoracoscopic bullectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:630–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Czerny M, Salat A, Fleck T, et al. Lung wedge resection improves outcome in stage I primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:1802–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sakamoto K, Takei H, Nishii T, et al. Staple line coverage with absorbable mesh after thoracoscopic bullectomy for spontaneous pneumothorax. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:478–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Luh SP, Chou HH, Tsai TP, et al. Effect of Surgicel coverage with topical electrocauterization for preventing and sealing pulmonary air leakage. Int Surg. 2004;89:190–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lichter I, Gwynne JF. Spontaneous pneumothorax in young subjects. A clinical and pathological study. Thorax. 1971;26:409–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Primrose WR. Spontaneous pneumothorax: a retrospective review of aetiology, pathogenesis and management. Scott Med J. 1984;29:15–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schramel FM, Postmus PE, Vanderschueren RG. Current aspects of spontaneous pneumothorax. Eur Respir J. 1997;10:1372–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Crisci R, Coloni GF. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax. A comparison of results and costs. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1996;10:556–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dumont P, Diemont F, Massard G, Toumieux B, Wihlm JM, Morand G. Does a thoracoscopic approach for surgical treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax represent progress? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997;11:27–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Muramatsu T, Ohmori K, Shimamura M, Furuichi M, Takeshita S, Negishi N. Staple line reinforcement with fleece-coated fibrin glue (TachoComb) after thoracoscopic bullectomy for the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax. Surg Today. 2007;37:745–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cardillo G, Carleo F, Giunti R, et al. Videothoracoscopic talc poudrage in primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a single institution experience in 861 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:322–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen JS, Hsu HH, Chen RJ, et al. Additional minocycline pleurodesis after thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173:548–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang YC, Chen CW, Huang SH, Chen JS. Modified needlescopic video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: the long-term effects of apical pleurectomy versus pleural abrasion. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:757–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu YH, Chao YK, Wu YC, et al. Bullae ablation in primary spontaneous pneumothorax. World J Surg. 2009;33:938–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cho S, Ryu KM, Jheon S, et al. Additional mechanical pleurodesis after thoracoscopic wedge resection and covering procedure for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:986–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cho S, Huh DM, Kim BH, et al. Staple line covering procedure after thoracoscopic bullectomy for the management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;56:217–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee S, Park SY, Bae MK, et al. Efficacy of polyglycolic acid sheet after thoracoscopic bullectomy for spontaneous pneumothorax. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:1919–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee S, Kim HR, Cho S, et al. Staple line coverage after bullectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:2005–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kurihara M. Thoracoscopic surgery for pneumothorax and its recurrence after thoracoscopic surgery. Asian J Surg. 1999;22:9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kurihara M, Mizobuchi T, Kataoka H, et al. A total pleural covering for lymphangioleiomyomatosis prevents pneumothorax recurrence. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0163637. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163637.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Biçer M, Bayram AS, Gürbüz O, et al. Assessment of the efficacy of bio-absorbable oxidized regenerated cellulose for prevention of post-operative pericardial adhesion in the rabbit model. J Int Med Res. 2008;36:1311–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Isaka T, Kanzaki M, Kikkawa T, Onuki T. In vivo and in vitro degradation behavior of artificial materials used for sealing pulmonary air leak. J Japan Assoc Chest Surg. 2011;5:466–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP25462171. We would like to thank Editage (http://www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuichiro Ozawa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozawa, Y., Sakai, M. & Ichimura, H. Covering the staple line with polyglycolic acid sheet versus oxidized regenerated cellulose mesh after thoracoscopic bullectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 66, 419–424 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-018-0927-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-018-0927-9

Keywords

Navigation