Abstract
The present article examines how disease anthropomorphism affects compliance with recommendations for preventing the disease. We find that consumers are more likely to comply with health recommendations when the disease is described in anthropomorphic (vs. non-anthropomorphic) terms because anthropomorphism increases psychological closeness to the disease, which increases perceived vulnerability. We demonstrate the effect of disease anthropomorphism on health compliance in seven studies with several diseases (COVID-19, breast cancer), manipulations of anthropomorphism (first person and third person; with and without an image), and participant populations (the US and China). We test the proposed pathway through psychological closeness and perceived vulnerability with sequential mediation analyses and moderation-of-process approaches, and we rule out alternative accounts based on known consequences of anthropomorphism and antecedents of health compliance. This research contributes to the theory and practice of health communication and to the growing literature on how the anthropomorphism of negative entities affects consumers’ judgments and behaviors.







Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
COVID-19: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/Yu6AbvDJnmb0_aWKHjBCfA; Mucus/Mucinex: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGltaIqro-g; “Cells at Work!”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ek39M_lYUtE.
Study 3a included many questions that assessed multiple constructs, so we followed Leung, Kim, and Tse (2020) and conducted confirmatory factor analysis to determine whether the constructs were distinct. Results showed that all items loaded on the intended factor, and the average variance extracted (AVE) exceeded .50 (psychological closeness = .64, perceived vulnerability = .59, arousal = .65, vividness/concreteness = .56, perceived control = .66). Fornell and Larcker’s (1981) test also revealed that all AVEs were higher than the shared variances of .33, confirming that the measures represented distinct constructs.
We conducted Study 3b before Studies 2 and 3a, and unfortunately, we did not think to measure whether participants had received a professional breast screening within the last year.
As in Study 3a, we conducted confirmatory factor analysis for the items measured in Study 3b. Results showed that self-efficacy and response efficacy loaded on a single factor (which we combined into “efficacy”), but all other items loaded on the intended factors. The AVEs exceeded 0.50 for psychological closeness (.60), perceived vulnerability (.66), and perceived severity (.68) but not efficacy (.33). Fornell and Larcker’s (1981) test revealed that the AVEs of the first three variables exceeded the shared variance of .33, but the AVE of efficacy did not. One item in the efficacy measure (“To what extent do you believe that getting breast cancer is inevitable, and there is very little you can do to avoid it?”) exhibited weak correlations with the remaining items, which accounted for the relatively low reliability score. We kept this item in the analysis, but the results are qualitatively the same if we exclude it.
CDC Statement on President’s Fiscal Year 2022 Budget: https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/s0528-fiscal-year-2022.html.
References
Achar, C., Agrawal, N., & Hsieh, M. H. (2020). Fear of detection and efficacy of prevention: Using construal level to encourage health behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(3), 582–598.
Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2007). Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 468–479.
Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2012). When brands seem human, do humans act like brands? Automatic behavioral priming effects of brand anthropomorphism. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(2), 307–323.
Ahn, H.-K., Kim, H.-J., & Aggarwal, P. (2014). Helping fellow beings: Anthropomorphized social causes and the role of anticipatory guilt. Psychological Science, 25(1), 224–229.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612.
Berger, J., & Rand, L. (2008). Shifting signals to help health: Using identity signaling to reduce risky health behaviors. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 509–518.
Berkowitz, L., & Cottingham, D. R. (1960). The interest value and relevance of fear arousing communications. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60(1), 37–43.
Block, L. G., & Keller, P. A. (1995). When to accentuate the negative: The effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health-related behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(2), 192–203.
Block, L. G., & Keller, P. A. (1998). Beyond protection motivation: An integrative theory of health appeals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(17), 1584–1608.
Bränström, R., Kristjansson, S., & Ullen, H. (2006). Risk perception, optimistic bias, and readiness to change sun related behaviour. The European Journal of Public Health, 16(5), 492–497.
Briley, D. A., Rudd, M., & Aaker, J. (2017). Cultivating optimism: How to frame your future during a health challenge. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(4), 895–915.
Brouwers, M. C., & Sorrentino, R. M. (1993). Uncertainty orientation and protection motivation theory: The role of individual differences in health compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 102–112.
Bruehlman-Senecal, E., & Ayduk, O. (2015). This too shall pass: Temporal distance and the regulation of emotional distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(2), 356–375.
Buechel, E. C., Zhang, J., Morewedge, C. K., & Vosgerau, J. (2014). More intense experiences, less intense forecasts: Why people overweight probability specifications in affective forecasts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(1), 20–36.
Chandler, J. J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Lie for a dime: When most prescreening responses are honest but most study participants are impostors. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(5), 500–508.
Chandler, J. J., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Use does not wear ragged the fabric of friendship: Thinking of objects as alive makes people less willing to replace them. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(2), 138–145.
Chandran, S., & Menon, G. (2004). When a day means more than a year: Effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 375–389.
Cox, D. N., Koster, A., & Russell, C. G. (2004). Predicting intentions to consume functional foods and supplements to offset memory loss using an adaptation of protection motivation theory. Appetite, 43(1), 55–64.
Creamer, M. (2012). Anti-smoking campaigns work, so don’t quit now. Ad Age. Accessed August 15, 2019, from https://adage.com/article/news/funding-anti-tobacco-ads-fell-quitting-rate/232111
De Visser, E. J., Monfort, S. S., Mckendrick, R., & Smith, M. A. (2016). Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22(3), 331–349.
Egenhofer, M. J. (1994). Deriving the composition of binary topological relations. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 5(2), 133–149.
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing a human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886.
Eyal, P., Rothschild, D. M., Evernden, Z., Gordon, A., & Damer, E. (2021). Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01694-3
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2008). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books.
Ferguson, E., & Bibby, P. A. (2002). Predicting future blood donor returns: Past behavior, intentions, and observer effects. Health Psychology, 21(5), 513–518.
Floyd, D. L., Prentice-Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (2000). A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(2), 407–429.
Folkes, V. S., & Kiesler, T. (1991). Social cognition: Consumers’ inferences about the self and others. Handbook of Consumer Behavior, 3, 281–315.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Gächter, S., Starmer, C., & Tufano, F. (2015). Measuring the closeness of relationships: A comprehensive evaluation of the 'Inclusion of the Other in the Self’ scale. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0129478. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129478
Guthrie, S. E. (1993). Faces in the clouds.Oxford University Press.
Han, D., Duhachek, A., & Agrawal, N. (2016). Coping and construal level matching drives health message effectiveness via response efficacy or self-efficacy enhancement. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(3), 429–447.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Guilford Press.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley.
Hellmich, N. (2013). Most people aren’t meeting exercise guidelines. USA Today, Accessed July 22, 2019, from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/05/02/physical-activity-guidelines/2128971/
Higgins, E. T. (1996). The” self digest”: Self-knowledge serving self-regulatory functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1062–1083.
Hovland, C., Janis, I., & Kelley, H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. Yale University Press.
Holman, D. M., Berkowitz, Z., Guy, G. P., Jr., Hawkins, N. A., Saraiya, M., & Watson, M. (2015). Patterns of sunscreen use on the face and other exposed skin among US adults. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 73(1), 83–92.
Hsieh, M. H., Li, X. B., Jain, S. P., & Swaminathan, V. (2021). Self-construal drives preference for partner and servant brands. Journal of Business Research, 129, 183–192.
Hur, J. D., Koo, M., & Hofmann, W. (2015). When temptations come alive: How anthropomorphism undermines self-control. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(2), 340–358.
Janis, I. L., & Terwilliger, R. F. (1962). An experimental study of psychological resistances to fear arousing communications. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(6), 403–410.
Keller, P. A., & Block, L. G. (1996). Increasing the persuasiveness of fear appeals: The effect of arousal and elaboration. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(4), 448–459.
Kim, D. J. M., & Yoon, S. (2021). Guilt of the meat-eating consumer: When animal anthropomorphism leads to healthy meat dish choices. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(4), 665–683.
Kim, H. S., Sherman, D. K., & Updegraff, J. A. (2016a). Fear of Ebola: The influence of collectivism on xenophobic threat responses. Psychological Science, 27(7), 935–944.
Kim, S., & McGill, A. L. (2011). Gaming with Mr. Slot or gaming the slot machine? Power, anthropomorphism, and risk perception. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 94–107.
Kim, S., Chen, R. P., & Zhang, K. (2016b). Anthropomorphized helpers undermine autonomy and enjoyment in computer games. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(2), 282–302.
Koo, M., Oh, H., & Patrick, V. M. (2019). From oldie to goldie: Humanizing old produce enhances its appeal. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 4(4), 337–351.
Kwak, H., Puzakova, M., & Rocereto, J. F. (2015). Better not smile at the price: The differential role of brand anthropomorphization on perceived price fairness. Journal of Marketing, 79(4), 56–76.
Kwak, H., Puzakova, M., & Rocereto, J. F. (2017). When brand anthropomorphism alters perceptions of justice: The moderating role of self-construal. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(4), 851–871.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(8), 453–486.
Leung, F. F., Kim, S., & Tse, C. H. (2020). Highlighting effort versus talent in service employee performance: Customer attributions and responses. Journal of Marketing, 48(3), 106–121.
Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. (2007a). Psychological distance. Guilford Press.
Liberman, N., Trope, Y., McCrea, S. M., & Sherman, S. J. (2007b). The effect of level of construal on the temporal distance of activity enactment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(1), 143–149.
Lin, R., & Utz, S. (2015). The emotional responses of browsing Facebook: Happiness, envy, and the role of tie strength. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 29–38.
Lisjak, M., & Lee, A. Y. (2014). The bright side of impulse: Depletion heightens self-protective behavior in the face of danger. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 55–70.
Litman, L., Moss, A., Rosenzweig, C., & Robinson, J. (2021). Reply to MTurk, Prolific or panels? Choosing the right audience for online research. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3775075
Litman, L., Robinson, J., & Abberbock, T. (2017). Turkprime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 433–442.
Maddux, J. E., & Rogers, R. W. (1983). Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(5), 469–479.
Maglio, S. J. (2020). Psychological distance in consumer psychology: Consequences and antecedents. Consumer Psychology Reviewer, 3(1), 108–125.
Mann, L. (1967). The effects of emotional role playing on desire to modify smoking habits. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3(4), 334–338.
May, F., & Monga, A. (2014). When time has a will of its own, the powerless don’t have the will to wait: Anthropomorphism of time can decrease patience. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 924–942.
Menon, G., Block, L. G., & Ramanathan, S. (2002). We’re at as much risk as we are led to believe: Effects of message cues on judgments of health risk. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), 533–549.
Morris, K. A., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (1996). Denial and the AIDS crisis: On wishing away the threat of AIDS. In S. Oskamp & S. C. Thompson (Eds.), Understanding and preventing HIV risk behavior: Safer sex and drug use (pp. 57–79). Sage Publications Inc.
Murdock, M. R., & Rajagopal, P. (2017). The sting of social: How emphasizing social consequences in warning messages influences perceptions of risk. Journal of Marketing, 81(2), 83–98.
Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435–450.
Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 54–74.
Paddock C. (2016). CDC: 90% of Americans consume too much salt. Medical News Today, Accessed July 22, 2019, from https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/304833
Pechmann, C., Zhao, G., Goldberg, M. E., & Reibling, E. T. (2003). What to convey in antismoking advertisements for adolescents: The use of protection motivation theory to identify effective message themes. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 1–18.
Pham, N., Mandel, N., & Morales, A. C. (2016). Messages from the food police: How food-related warnings backfire among dieters. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1(1), 175–190.
Puzakova, M., & Aggarwal, P. (2018). Brands as rivals: Consumer pursuit of distinctiveness and the role of brand anthropomorphism. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(4), 869–888.
Puzakova, M., Kwak, H., & Rocereto, J. F. (2013a). When humanizing brands goes wrong: The detrimental effect of brand anthropomorphization amid product wrongdoings. Journal of Marketing, 77(3), 81–100.
Puzakova, M., Rocereto, J. F., & Kwak, H. (2013b). Ads are watching me: A view from the interplay between anthropomorphism and customisation. International Journal of Advertising, 32(4), 513–538.
Raghubir, P., & Menon, G. (1998). AIDS and me, never the twain shall meet: The effects of information accessibility on judgments of risk and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 52–63.
Reavey, B., Puzakova, M., Larsen Andras, T., & Kwak, H. (2018). The multidimensionality of anthropomorphism in advertising: The moderating roles of cognitive busyness and assertive language. International Journal of Advertising, 37(3), 440–462.
Rim, S., Hansen, J., & Trope, Y. (2013). What happens why? Psychological distance and focusing on causes versus consequences of events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(3), 457–472.
Rippetoe, P. A., & Rogers, R. W. (1987). Effects of components of protection-motivation theory on adaptive and maladaptive coping with a health threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 596–604.
Riva, P., Sacchi, S., & Brambilla, M. (2015). Humanizing machines: Anthropomorphization of slot machines increases gambling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21(4), 313–325.
Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 91(1), 93–114.
Rogers, R. W. (1983). Preventive health psychology: An interface of social and clinical psychology. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1(2), 120–127.
Sherman, D. A., Nelson, L. D., & Steele, C. M. (2000). Do messages about health risks threaten the self? Increasing the acceptance of threatening health messages via self-affirmation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1046–1058.
Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845–851.
Tam, K., Lee, S., & Chao, M. M. (2013). Saving Mr. Nature: Anthropomorphism enhances connectedness to and protectiveness toward nature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 514–521.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2020). Flu vaccination coverage, United States, 2019–20 Influenza Season. Accessed Feb 24, 2022, from https://www.cdc.gov/flu/fluvaxview/coverage-1920estimates.htm
Touré-Tillery, M., & McGill, A. L. (2015). Who or what to believe: Trust and the differential persuasiveness of human and anthropomorphized messengers. Journal of Marketing, 79(4), 94–110.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463.
Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83–95.
Tunner, J. F., Jr., Day, E., & Crask, M. R. (1989). Protection motivation theory: An extension of fear appeals theory in communication. Journal of Business Research, 19(4), 267–276.
Vater, L. B., Donohue, J. M., Arnold, R., White, D. B., Chu, E., & Schenker, Y. (2014). What are cancer centers advertising to the public? A content analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 160(2), 813–820.
Wan, E. W., Chen, R. P., & Jin, L. (2017). Judging a book by its cover? The effect of anthropomorphism on product attribute processing and consumer preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(6), 1008–1030.
Wan, J., Kulow, K., & Cowan, K. (2022). It’s alive! Increasing protective action against the coronavirus through anthropomorphism and construal. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 7(1), 81–88.
Wang, H., Jing, R., Lai, Z., Zhang, J., Lyu, Y., Knoll, M. D., & Fang, H. (2020). Acceptance of COVID-19 vacination during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Vaccines, 8(3), 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8030482
Wang, L., Kim, S., & Zhou, Y. (2022). Money in a “safe” place: Money anthropomorphism increases saving behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing, Forthcoming,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.02.001
Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322(5901), 606–607.
Williams, L. E., Stein, R., & Galguera, L. (2014). The distinct affective consequences of psychological distance and construal level. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1123–1138.
Wilson, D. K., Purdon, S. E., & Wallston, K. A. (1988). Compliance to health recommendations: A theoretical overview of message framing. Health Education Research, 3(2), 161–171.
Wolff, P., & Barbey, A. K. (2015). Causal reasoning with forces. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 1–17.
World Health Organization (2020). The top 10 causes of death. Accessed December 12, 2021, from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death
Wurtele, S. K., & Maddux, J. E. (1987). Relative contributions of protection motivation theory components in predicting exercise intentions and behavior. Health Psychology, 6(5), 453–466.
Yan, D., & Sengupta, J. (2013). The influence of base rate and case information on health-risk perceptions: A unified model of self-positivity and self-negativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 931–946.
Zhou, X., Kim, S., & Wang, L. (2019). Money helps when money feels: Money anthropomorphism increases charitable giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(5), 953–972.
Zhu, H., Wong, N., & Huang, M. (2019). Does relationship matter? How social distance influences perceptions of responsibility on anthropomorphized environmental objects and conservation intentions. Journal of Business Research, 95, 62–70.
Funding
This research was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71972169) awarded to the first author, and by funding from the Richard M. Clewett Endowed Professorship, Kellogg School of Management, awarded to the second author. All authors contributed equally to this research. The authors’ names are listed in reverse alphabetical order.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Martin Mende served as Area Editor for this article.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, L., Touré-Tillery, M. & McGill, A.L. The effect of disease anthropomorphism on compliance with health recommendations. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 51, 266–285 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00891-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00891-6