Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ensuring international competitiveness: a configurative approach to foreign marketing subsidiaries

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasingly, multinational companies (MNCs) operate their global marketing activities through foreign marketing subsidiaries. However, this practice presents MNCs with the challenge of efficiently and effectively managing a portfolio of subsidiaries with numerous diverging characteristics. To reduce the complexity of managing such a portfolio and to increase MNCs’ and subsidiaries’ performance, we provide MNCs with a marketing subsidiary taxonomy that enables them to understand and manage different subsidiary types. Analysis of a cross-sectional, multi-country, multiple-informant dataset generated five marketing subsidiary clusters, which are distinct in the structural characteristics of size, age, and value-added scope and the strategic characteristics of strategic influence, strategic competence, and strategic importance. Subsidiary performance outcomes, subsidiary environmental conditions including important marketing aspects (e.g., customer characteristics), and headquarters’ coordination and communication mechanisms enrich our cluster description and yield a holistic picture of our marketing subsidiary taxonomy. The empirical results provide significant theoretical and managerial implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almeida, P., & Phene, A. (2004). Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: the influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8/9), 847–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambos, T. C., & Birkinshaw, J. (2010). Headquarters’ attention and its effect on subsidiary performance. Management International Review, 50(04), 449–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. (2007). Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: a business network view. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(05), 802–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arabie, P., & Hubert, L. (1994). Cluster analysis in marketing research. In R. P. Bagozzi (Ed.), Advanced methods of marketing research (pp. 160–179). Cambridge: Blackwell Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(08), 396–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asmussen, C. G., Pedersen, T., & Dhanaraj, C. (2009). Host-country environment and subsidiary competence: extending the diamond network model. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(01), 42–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(01), 74–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, K. D. (1994). Typologies and taxonomies: an introduction to classification techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1986). Tap your subsidiaries for global reach. Harvard Business Review, 64(06), 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bello, D. C., & Gilliland, D. I. (1997). The effect of output controls, process controls, and flexibility on export channel performance. Journal of Marketing, 61(01), 22–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benito, G. R. G., Narula, B., & Grogaard, B. (2003). Environmental influences on MNE subsidiary roles: economic integration and the Nordic countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(05), 443–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. (1997). Entrepreneurship in multinational companies: the characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal, 38(03), 207–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. (1998). Multinational subsidiary evolution: capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(04), 773–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., & Morrison, A. J. (1995). Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(04), 729–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., Toulan, O., & Arnold, D. (2001). Global account management in multinational corporations: theory and Evidence. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(02), 231–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blocker, C. P., Flint, D. J., Myers, M. B., & Slater, S. F. (2011). Proactive customer orientation and its role for creating customer value in global markets. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(02), 216–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn, M. D. (1993). Taxonomy of buying decision approaches. Journal of Marketing, 57(01), 38–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, V. D., Rose, G. M., Gilbert, F., & Ingram, T. N. (2001). Managing culturally diverse buyer-seller relatioships: the role of intercultural disposition and adaptive selling in developing intercultural communication competence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(04), 391–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadogan, J. W., Paul, N. J., Salminen, R. T., Puumalainen, K., & Sundqvist, S. (2001). Key antecedents to “export” market-oriented behaviors: a cross-national empirical examination. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 18(03), 261–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadogan, J. W., Sundqvist, S., Salminen, R. T., & Puumalainen, K. (2005). Export Marketing, Interfunctional Interactions, and Performance Consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(04), 520–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. J. (1995). International expansion strategy of Japanese firms: capability building through sequential entry. Academy of Management Journal, 38(02), 383–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. (1973). Strategies of control and organizational behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18(01), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cray, D. (1984). Control and coordination in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 15(02), 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Backer, K., & Sleuwaegen, L. (2005). A closer look at the productivity advantage of foreign affiliates. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 12(01), 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. (2001). Survival and profitability: the roles of experience and intangible assets in foreign subsidiary performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(05), 1028–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpandé, R., Farley, J. U., & Webster, F. E., Jr. (1993). Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: a quadrad analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57(01), 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duda, R. O., & Hart, P. E. (1973). Pattern classification and scene analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, P., & Hughes, A. (1994). Age, size, growth and survival: UK companies in the 1980s. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(02), 115–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egelhoff, W. G. (1988). Strategy and structure in multinational corporations: a revision of the Stepford and Wells model. Strategic Management Journal, 9(01), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekeledo, I., & Sivakumar, K. (1998). Foreign market entry mode choice of service firms: a contingency perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(04), 274–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, M. J., & Subramanian, V. (2007). An organizing framework for MNC subsidiary typologies. Management International Review, 47(06), 895–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faes, W., Matthyssens, P., & Vandenbempt, K. (2000). The Pursuit of Global Purchasing Synergy. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(06), 539–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Y., Wade, M., Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. (2007). International diversification, subsidiary performance, and the mobility of knowledge resources. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10), 1053–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(02), 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, T. S., Birkinshaw, J. M., & Ensign, P. C. (2002). Centers of excellence in multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11), 997–1018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J.-M. (1997). Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(01), 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gencturk, E. F., & Aulakh, P. S. (1995). The use of process and output controls in foreign markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(04), 755–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(02), 186–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., & Nohria, N. (1989). Internal differentiation within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 10(04), 323–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V. (1986). Decentralization, strategy, and the effectiveness of strategic business units in multibusiness organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11(04), 844–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, R., Chandrashekaran, M., & Dwyer, F. R. (2008). Navigating local environments with global strategies: a contingency model of multinational subsidiary performance. Marketing Science, 27(05), 886–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, D., Iyer, G. R., Kamakura, W. A., Mehrotra, A., & Sharma, A. (2009). Evaluation of subsidiary marketing performance: combining process and outcome performance metrics. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(02), 117–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinyer, P. H., & Yasai-Ardekani, M. (1981). Strategy, structure, size and bureaucracy. Academy of Management Journal, 24(03), 471–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1991). Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review, 16(04), 768–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., MacMillan, I. C., & Day, D. L. (1982). Strategic attributes and performance in the BCG matrix—A PIMS-based analysis of industrial product businesses. Academy of Management Journal, 25(03), 510–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, M. G., Novicevic, M. M., Hench, T., & Myers, M. (2003). Global account management: a supply-side managerial view. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(07), 563–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harzing, A.-W. (1997). Response rates in international mail surveys: results of a 22-country study. International Business Review, 6(06), 641–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harzing, A.-W. (1999). Managing the multinational. Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harzing, A.-W., & Sorge, A. (2003). The relative impact of country of origin and universal contingencies on internationalization strategies and corporate control in multinational enterprises: worldwide and European perspectives. Organization Studies, 24(02), 187–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsen, K., & Green, P. E. (1991). A computational study of replicated clustering with an application to market segmentation. Decision Sciences, 22(05), 1124–1141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (1991). Control in multinational firms: the role of price and hierarchy. Management International Review, 31(04), 71–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewett, K., & Bearden, W. O. (2001). Dependence, trust, and relational behavior on the part of foreign subsidiary marketing operations: implications for managing global marketing operations. Journal of Marketing, 65(04), 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewett, K., Roth, M., & Roth, K. (2003). Conditions influencing headquarters and foreign subsidiary roles in marketing activities and their effects on performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(06), 567–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (1985). Corporate distinctive competence: strategy, industry, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 6(03), 273–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., & Pflesser, C. (2000). A multiple-layer model of market-oriented organizational culture: measurement issues and performance outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(04), 449–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., Workman, J. P., & Jensen, O. (2002). A configurational perspective on key account management. Journal of Marketing, 66(02), 38–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., Jensen, O., & Krohmer, H. (2008). Configurations of marketing and sales: a taxonomy. Journal of Marketing, 72(02), 133–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulbert, J. M., Brandt, W. K., & Richers, R. (1980). Marketing planning in the multinational subsidiary: practices and problems. Journal of Marketing, 44(03), 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. T. M., & Ketchen, D. J., Jr. (2001). Does Market Orientation Matter? A Test of Relationship between positional Advantage and Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 22(09), 899–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., & Slater, S. F. (2005). Market orientation and performance: an integration of disparate approaches. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1173–1181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., Jr., Griffith, D. A., Chabowski, B. R., Hamman, M. K., Dykes, B. J., et al. (2008). An assessment of the measurement of performance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(06), 1064–1080.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, A. M. (1983). The transfer of organizational culture overseas: an approach to control in the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(02), 91–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S. C. (1989). Standardization of international marketing strategy: some research hypotheses. Journal of Marketing, 53(01), 70–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarillo, J., & Martinez, J. I. (1990). Different roles for subsidiaries: the case of multinational corporations in Spain. Strategic Management Journal, 11(07), 501–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J., & Tellis, G. J. (2008). Drivers of Success for Market Entry into China and India. Journal of Marketing, 72(03), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, S., & Menguc, B. (2007). Subsidiary size and the level of autonomy in multinational corporations: a quadratic model investigation of Australian subsidiaries. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(05), 787–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsikeas, C. S., Samiee, S., & Theodosiou, M. (2006). Strategy fit and performance consequences of international marketing standardization. Strategic Management Journal, 27(09), 867–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketchen, D. J., & Shook, C. L. (1996). The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: an analysis and critique. Strategic Management Journal, 17(06), 441–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketchen, D. J., Thomas, J. B., & Snow, C. C. (1993). Organizational configurations and performance: a comparison of theoretical approaches. Academy of Management Journal, 36(06), 1278–1313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K., Park, J.-H., & Prescott, J. E. (2003). The global integration of business functions: a study of multinational businesses in integrated global industries. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(04), 327–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. (2005). Market orientation: a meta-analytical review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69(02), 24–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirca, A. H., Bearden, W. O., & Roth, K. (2010). Implementation of market orientation in the subsidiaries of global companies: the role of institutional factors. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. doi:10.1007/s11747-010-0234-1.

  • Klein, J. G., Ettenson, R., & Krishnan, B. C. (2006). Extending the construct of consumer ethnocentrism: when foreign products are preferred. International Marketing Review, 23(03), 304–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak, H., Jaju, A., & Larsen, T. (2006). Consumer ethnocentrism offline and online: the mediating role of marketing efforts and personality traits in the United States, South Korea, and India. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(03), 367–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, L. K. S., Acito, F., & Rusetsko, A. (2006). Development of archetypes of international marketing strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(04), 499–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar, S. K. (1997). The impact of size and age on firm-level performance: some evidence from India. Review of Industrial Organization, 12(02), 231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltz, E., & Kohli, A. K. (1996). Market intelligence dissemination across functional boundaries. Journal of Marketing, 33(01), 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, J. I., & Jarillo, J. (1989). The evolution of research on coordination mechanism in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 20(03), 489–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, R. M., & Blashfield, R. K. (1980). A nearest-centroid technique for evaluating the minimum-variance clustering procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 15(02), 225–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, A., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Howell, R. (1996). The quality and effectiveness of marketing strategy: effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict in intraorganizational relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(04), 299–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A. S., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 26(06), 1175–1195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of Management Review, 3(03), 546–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Friesen, P. (1980). Archetypes of organizational transition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(02), 286–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, G. W. (1996). Clustering validation: results and implications for applied analyses. In P. Arabie, L. Hubert, & G. De Soete (Eds.), Clustering and classification (pp. 341–375). River Edge: World Scientific Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. (1985). An Examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika, 50(02), 159–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. (1987). Methodology review: clustering methods. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11(04), 329–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Björkman, I., Fey, C. F., & Park, H. J. (2003). MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(06), 586–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. B., & Yip, G. S. (2000). The Challenge of Global Customer Management. Research Paper No. 1619. Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.

  • Montgomery, D. B., Yip, G. S., & Villalonga. B. (2001). An Industry Explanation of Global Account Management. Research Paper No. 1724. Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.

  • Moore, K., & Birkinshaw, J. M. (1998). Managing knowledge in global service firms: centers of excellence. The Academy of Management Executive, 12(04), 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(03), 20–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J. Y., Yong Gao, G., & Kotabe, M. (2011). Market orientation and performance of export ventures: the process through marketing capabilities and competitive advantages. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(03), 255–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakata, C., & Sivakumar, K. (2001). Instituting the marketing concept in a multinational setting: the role of national culture. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(03), 367–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, S. W. (2000). Managing foreign subsidiaries: agents of headquarters, or an independent network? Strategic Management Journal, 21(05), 525–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, E. M., Walker, O. C., & Ruekert, R. W., Jr. (1995). Organizing for effective new product development: the moderating role of product innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, 59(01), 48–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özsomer, A., & Gencturk, E. F. (2003). A resource-based model of market learning in the subsidiary: the capabilities of exploration and exploitation. Journal of International Marketing, 8(01), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pangarkar, N., & Klein, S. (2004). The impact of control on international joint venture performance: a contingency approach. Journal of International Marketing, 12(03), 86–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, S. L., & Brock, D. M. (2002). The development of subsidiary-management research: review and theoretical analysis. International Business Review, 11(02), 139–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phene, A., & Almeida, P. (2003). How do firms evolve? The patterns of technological evolution of semiconductor subsidiaries. International Business Review, 12(03), 349–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Millar, V. E. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63(04), 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C., & Hamel, G. (1990). The competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(03), 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., & Turner, C. (1969). The context of organization structures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(01), 91–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punj, G., & Stewart, D. W. (1983). Cluster analysis in marketing research: review and suggestions for application. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(02), 134–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand, W. M. (1971). Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66(336), 846–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, P. (1992). The organizational taxonomy: definition and design. Academy of Management Review, 17(04), 758–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K., & Morrison, A. J. (1992). Implementing global strategy: characteristics of global subsidiary mandates. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(04), 715–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samiee, S., & Roth, K. (1992). The Influence of Global Marketing Standardization on Performance. Journal of Marketing, 56(02), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samiee, S., Shimp, T. A., & Sharma, S. (2005). Brand origin recognition accuracy: its antecedents and consumers’ cognitive limitations. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(04), 379–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarle, W. S. (1983). Cubic clustering criterion. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilke, O., Reinmann, M., Birkinshaw, J., & Thomas, J. S. (2009). When Does International Marketing Standardization Matter to Firm Performance? Journal of International Marketing, 17(04), 24–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, L. H., White, J. C., Zou, S., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2010). Global account management strategies: drivers and outcomes. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(04), 620–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimp, T. A., & Sharma, S. (1987). Consumer ethnocentrism: construction and validation of the CETSACLE. Journal of Marketing, 24(03), 280–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J., Payne, G., & Ketchen, D. (2008). Research on organizational configurations: past accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 34(06), 1053–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J., Verbeke, W., & Rhoads, G. K. (1996). Do organizational practices matter in role stress processes? A study of direct and moderating effects for marketing-oriented boundary spanners. Journal of Marketing, 60(03), 69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solberg, C. A. (2000). Standardization or adaptation of the international marketing mix: the role of the local subsidiary/representative. Journal of International Marketing, 8(01), 78–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, J. H. (1997). Autonomy and procedural justice: a framework for evaluating subsidiary strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(01), 51–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, J. H. (1998). Strategy shift in MNC subsidiaries. Strategic Management Journal, 19(07), 663–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venaik, S., Midgley, D. F., & Devinney, T. M. (2005). Dual paths of performance: the impact of global pressures on MNC subsidiary conduct and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(06), 655–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorhies, D. W., & Morgan, N. A. (2003). A Configuration Theory Assessment of Marketing Organization Fit with Business Strategy and Its Relationship with Marketing Performance. Journal of Marketing, 67(01), 100–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, O. C., Jr., & Ruekert, R. W. (1987). Marketing’s role in the implementation of business strategies: a critical review and conceptual framework. Journal of Marketing, 51(03), 15–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, R. A., & Duncan, S. B. (1969). A Bayes Rule for the Symmetric Multiple Comparisons Problem. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64(328), 1484–1503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. H., Jr. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 236–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. E., & Poynter, A. T. (1984). Strategies for foreign-owned subsidiaries in Canada. Business Quarterly, 49(02), 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization. (2009). Annual report. Geneva: World Trade Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou, S., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2002). The GMS: a broad conceptualization of global marketing strategy and its effect on firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 66(04), 40–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Petra Schenkel and Frank Becker for their assistance in the data collection and analysis phase of this study. All authors contributed equally to this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Marketing, University of Mannheim, Schloss, 68131, Mannheim, Germany

    Christian Homburg & Christina Kuehnl

  2. Department of Management and Marketing, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

    Christian Homburg

  3. Department of Marketing, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Lange Gasse 20, 90403, Nürnberg, Germany

    Andreas Fürst

Authors
  1. Christian Homburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas Fürst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christina Kuehnl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Homburg.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 7 Scale Items for Construct Measurement
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Homburg, C., Fürst, A. & Kuehnl, C. Ensuring international competitiveness: a configurative approach to foreign marketing subsidiaries. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 40, 290–312 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0264-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0264-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation