Abstract
Modern injection molding machines can reproduce machine values, such as the position and speed of the plasticizing screw, with a high precision. To achieve a further improvement of the part quality, adaption and self-optimization strategies are required, which is realized by the implementation of a model-based self-optimization to an injection molding machine. Within this concept, a pvT-optimization allows an online control of the holding pressure that is tailored to the plastics material, considering the relationship between pressure, specific volume and temperature. A control strategy is required that controls the cavity pressure with respect to the reference generated by the pvT-optimization. However, cavity pressure control, in contrast to pressure control in the plasticizing unit, is hitherto not possible without a time-consuming system parametrization. Due to the repetitive character of the injection molding process, the iterative learning control (ILC) is a suitable approach. The ILC uses information gained within the previous cycle and a model to generate the optimal controller outputs for the following cycle. Based on this iterative learning, the reference tracking of the cavity pressure can be improved over several cycles. Additionally, repetitive disturbances can be compensated automatically. To improve the convergence speed of the ILC, a process model can be used explicitly. Based on this premise, an ILC for cavity pressure control is developed and researched in injection molding experiments. It is shown that the flexibility of the control strategy can be improved without compromising performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Menges G, Stitz S, Vargel J (1971) Grundlagen der Prozeßsteuerung beim Spritzgießen. Kunststoffe 61 (2):74–80
Gao F, Yang Y (1997) Multi-variable interaction analysis and a proposed quality control system for thermoplastics injection molding. In: Society of Plastics Engineers, ANTEC 1997 Conference Proceedings, Toronto, Canada, p 480
Schreiber A (2011) Regelung des Spritzgießprozesses auf Basis von Prozessgrößen und im Werkzeug ermittelter Materialdaten. RWTH, Aachen
Sarholz R (1979) Spritzgießen: Verfahrensablauf, Verfahrensparameter, Prozeßführung. Hanser, München
Gordon G, Kazmer DO, Tang X, Fan Z, Gao RX (2015) Quality control using a multivariate injection molding sensor. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(9):1381–1391. doi:10.1007/s00170-014-6706-6
Hengesbach JA (1976) Verbesserung der Prozeßführung beim Spritzgießen durch Prozeßüberwachung. Dissertation, RWTH Aachen
Kruppa S (2015) Adaptive Prozessführung und alternative Einspritzkonzepte beim Spritzgießen von Thermoplasten. Dissertation, Universität Duisburg-Essen
Heinzler F (2014) Modellgestützte Qualitätsregelung durch eine adaptive, druckgeregelte Prozessführung beim Spritzgießen. Dissertation, Universität Duisburg-Essen
Brecher C, Karmann O, Kozielski S (2011) Integrative Produktionstechnik für Hochlohnländer. Springer, Berlin. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20693-1_1
Stitz S (1973) Analyse der Formteilbildung beim Spritzgießen von Plastomeren als Grundlage für die Prozeßsteuerung. Dissertation, RWTH Aachen
Stitz S, Hengesbach H-A, Pütz D (1973) Konstante Formteilqualität beim Spritzgießen durch Regeln des Werkzeug-Druckverlaufs. Kunststoffe 63 (11):777–783
Abu Fara D, Patterson WI, Kamal MR (1987) Cavity pressure control in injection molding during filling, packing, and holding. In: Society of Plastics Engineers, ANTEC 1987 Conference Proceedings, Los Angeles, USA, pp 221–224
Gao F, Patterson WI, Kamal MR (1996) Cavity pressure dynamics and self-tuning control for filling and packing phases of thermoplastics injection molding. Polym Eng Sci 36(9):1272–1285
Rafizadeh M (1996) Physically-based dynamic model for the control of cavity pressure in thermoplastics injection molding. Dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Kudlik N (1997) Reproduzierbarkeit des Kunststoff-Spritzgießprozesses. Dissertation, RWTH Aachen
Hopmann C, Reßmann A, Reiter M, Stemmler S, Abel D (2015) A self-optimising injection moulding process with model-based control system parameterisation. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 29(11):1–10
Gao F, Yang Y, Shao C (2001) Robust iterative learning control with applications to injection molding process. Chem Eng Sci 56 (24):7025–7034
Tan KK, Tang JC (2002) Learning-enhanced PI control of ram velocity in injection molding machines. Eng Appl Artif Intell 15(1):65–72. doi:10.1016/S0952-1976(02)00032-5
Havlicsek H AA (2002) Learning enhanced PI control of ram velocity in injection molding machines. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 15(1):312–323
Chuang L, Fuli W, Dapeng N, Yang L (2010) Cavity pressure control by iterative learning control with zero-phase filtering in injection molding. In: 2010 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, Xuzhou, China 26–28 May 2010. pp 376–379. doi:10.1109/CCDC.2010.5499047
Anon (2008) Anwenderfreundlich per Referenzkurven regeln. K Zeitung 39 (1/2):15
Permin E, Bertelsmeier F, Blum M, Buetzler J, Haag S, Kuz S, Oezdemir D, Stemmler S, Thombansen U, Schmitt R, Brecher C, Schlick C, Abel D, Poprawe R (2015) Peter Loosen Wolfgang Schulz GS Self-optimizing production systems. In: 48th CIRP Conference on MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS- CIRP CMS, 2015. Ischia (Naples), Italy
Thombanse U, Auerbach T, Schüttler J, Beckers M, Buchholz G, Eppelt U, Gloy Y-S, Fritz P, Kratz S, Lose J, Molitor T, Reßmann A, Schenuit H, Willms K, Gries T, Michaeli W, Petring D, Poprawe R, Reisgen U, Schmitt R, Schulz W, Veselovac D, Klocke F (2012) The road to self-optimising production technologies. In: Brecher C (ed) Integrative production technology for high-wage countries. Springer, Berlin, pp 793–848
Brecher C (2007) Integrative production technology—theory and applications. Springer, Berlin
Johnston SP, Mendible GA, Gao RX, Kazmer DO (2015) Estimation of bulk melt-temperature from in-mold thermal sensors for injection molding, Part a: method. Int Polym Proces 30 (4):460–466. doi:10.3139/217.3019
Seyfarth P (1962) Zur Bestimmung der Zykluszeit beim Spritzgießen. Plaste Kautschuk 9 (11):553–556
Hopmann C, Theunissen M, Heinisch J (2016) Compensating viscosity fluctuations in injection moulding. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference of the Polymer Processing Society (PPS32), Lyon, Frankreich, 2016. Lyon, France
Schmidt TW (1986) Zur Abschätzung der Schwindung. Dissertation, RWTH Aachen
Hopmann C, Reßmann A, Heinisch J (2016) Influence on product quality by pvT-optimised processing in injection compression molding. Int Polym Proces 31 (2):156–165
Michaeli W, Gruber J (2005) Prozessführung beim Spritzgießen—direkte Regelung des Werkzeuginnendrucks steigert die Reproduzierbarkeit. Zeitschrift Kunststofftechnik 1(1):1–12
Matzke A (1985) Prozeßrechnereinsatz beim Spritzgießen. Dissertation, RWTH Aachen
Rockel H (2005) Analyse und Synthese parametrisch iterativ lernender Regelungen. Dissertation, Technische Universität Clausthal
Seel T, Schauer T, Raisch J (2013) Iterativ Lernende Regelung mit variabler Zykluslänge für FES-basierte Kompensation einer Fußheberschwäche. Automatisierungstechnik 61 (9):630–637
Chen Y, Moore KL (2002) PI-type iterative learning control revisited. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference
Lee JH, Lee KS, Kim WC (2000) Model-based iterative learning control with a quadratic criterion for time-varying linear systems. Automatica 36(5):641–657
KL Moore, YQ Chen, V Bahl (2005) Monotonically convergent iterative learning control for linear discrete-time systems. Automatica 41(9)1529–1537, ISSN 0005-1098. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2005.01.019.
Stemmler S, Reiter M, Abel D (2015) Model predictive control as a module for autonomous operation of complex plastics production processes. Rubber Fibres Plast 10 (1):56–59
Acknowledgements
The depicted research has been funded by the German Research Foundation DFG as part of the program Cluster of Excellence ‘Integrative Production Technology for High-Wage Countries’. We would like to extend our thanks to the DFG. We would also like to thank Arburg GmbH & Co. KG, Loßburg, Germany, and Sabic Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Düsseldorf, Germany, who provided machines and materials for the depicted research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hopmann, C., Abel, D., Heinisch, J. et al. Self-optimizing injection molding based on iterative learning cavity pressure control. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 11, 97–106 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-017-0719-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-017-0719-6