Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive Configuration of a Lean Production System in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises

  • Production Management
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) are facing everyday the hard competition of global markets and higher requirements of the customers. For coping with these changing conditions many large enterprises implement a Lean Production System (LPS). An LPS offers a holistic strategy to eliminate waste in processes, to achieve high product and process quality, and to reduce lead times. The structure of an LPS is described by hierarchical connections of different elements and is configured in four levels: the goals, the sub-goals, the methods, and tools (Dombrowski et al. ZWF Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 101:113–118, 2006). While large enterprises are able to provide necessary resources and experts’ know-how to configure and implement an LPS, SMEs lack these essential resources for organizational, technological, and workforce-related changes. Due to the complexity of the structure of an LPS, SMEs have in practice a small opportunity to configure a suitable structure and often fail in selecting and evaluating the most adequate methods and tools to be used. In this regard, the paper presents a framework to support an adaptive configuration of an LPS in SMEs which has been partly developed in the research project ProfiL in close cooperation with six SMEs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ohno T (1998) Toyota production system: beyond large scale production. Productivity Press, Portland, OR

    Google Scholar 

  2. Spath D (2003) Ganzheitlich produzieren: Innovative Organisation und Führung. Log_X, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  3. Womack J-P, Jones D-T (2003) Lean thinking: banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cochran D-S (1999) The production system design and deployment framework. In: Proceedings of the SAE international automotive manufacturing conference, SAE Technical Papers: 1–9, Detroit

  5. Korge A (2005) Lean management mit system. wt Werkstattstechnik online 95:29–34

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dombrowski U, Palluck M, Schmidt S (2006) Strukturelle Analyse Ganzheitlicher Produktionssysteme. ZWF Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 101:113–118

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liker J-K, Meier D (2006) The Toyota way fieldbook: a practical guide for implementing, Toyota’s 4Ps. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Spear S, Bowen H-K (1999) Decoding the DNA of the Toyota production system. Harv Bus Rev September–October: 97–106

  9. Dombrowski U, Schmidt S, Crespo I (2007) Knowledge management as a supporting function in lean production system implementation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on changeable, agile, reconfigurable and virtual production, 453–462, Toronto

  10. Dombrowski U, Crespo I, Schmidt S (2007) A holistic approach to production optimization as an integral part of strategy development and implementation in small-and medium-sized enterprises. In: Proceedings of the 40th CIRP international manufacturing systems seminar, Liverpool

  11. Dombrowski U, Quack S (2007) Erfolgreiche Restrukturierungsprojekte durch Mit-arbeiterpartizipation. ZWF Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 102:568–571

    Google Scholar 

  12. Welter F (2003) Strategien, KMU und Umfeld. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schneider H (2000) Produktionsmanagement in kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  14. Herrmann C, Bergmann L, Crespo I (2006) Developing of an integrated modernization concept for SMEs. In: Proceedings of the 39th CIRP international seminar on manufacturing systems, 457–463, Ljubljana

  15. Kuhn S, Elzenheimer J (2006) Gezielter Methodeneinsatz im Mittelstand. VDI-Zeitschrift 6:86–89

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dombrowski U, Crespo I (2008) Strategy-oriented qualification framework as a supporting function of lean production system implementation in small and medium-sized enterprises. In: Mitsuishi M, Ueda K, Kimura F (eds) Manufacturing systems and technologies for the new frontier. Springer, London, pp 77–82

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Lay G, Zanker C (2008) Planungsinstrumente zur Verwirklichung Ganzheitlicher Produktionssysteme in KMU. wt Werkstattstechnik online 98:242–248

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dombrowski U, Horatzek S, Zeisig M (2002) Situatives mitarbeiterbezogenes management der ressource Wissen. wt Werkstatt Technik online 92/6:312–316

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dombrowski U, Crespo I (2009) Qualifizierungskonzept zur integrierten Modernisierung. In: Dombrowski U, Hermann C (eds) Modernisierung kleiner und mittlerer Unternehmen. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg New York, pp 109–116

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Dombrowski U, Tiedemann H, Bothe T (2003) Further education and training employees as a strategic competitive factor. BFT Betonwerk und Fertigteil-Technik 4:6–14

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dombrowski U, Crespo I (2008) A management approach to lean production system implementation in small and medium-sized enterprises—results of a research project. In: del Olmo R, Martínez J-M, Galán Ordax J-J, Villahoz Laviós (eds) Approaches and trends on current organization engineering. Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad de Burgos, Spain, pp 995–1005

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Crespo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dombrowski, U., Crespo, I. & Zahn, T. Adaptive Configuration of a Lean Production System in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 4, 341–348 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-010-0250-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-010-0250-5

Keywords

Navigation