Skip to main content
Log in

The role of general practitioners in the EU: time to draw lessons from a too wide range?

  • IM-Point of view
  • Published:
Internal and Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the role played by general practitioners (GPs) is historically consolidated, continuous changes have been recently introduced in Europe because of the increasing multimorbidity and complexity of patients. Here we try to compare the roles played by GPs in the four major countries of Europe. In France GPs are self-employed medical doctors, and their remuneration consists of a payment scheme for the services provided. The weekly opening hours of French GPs are on average approximately 48. In Germany primary care is mainly provided by GPs and outpatient internists, and patients are free to choose the facility and the professional. German GPs are self-employed professionals mainly remunerated for each consultation, who work for an average of 50 opening hours per week. In Italy GPs are self-employed professionals mainly paid on per capita basis, who have their own list of patients and must guarantee a minimum number of clinical opening hours per week, which has often become the average number in practice. Accordingly, the patients’ weekly access to Italian GPs’ clinics is very limited. In Spain GPs are civil servants who work in multifunctional facilities with multi-professional teams. The weekly hours worked by Spanish GPs are 38 hours, as for any other civil servant. Trying to draw positive lessons from the comparison, the Spanish facilities seem to be the most advanced examples of horizontal-integrated organizations able to fulfil the expectations of a growing population of ageing people. The range of generalist professionals could be enlarged beyond GPs, as the German example shows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Heyrman J (2005) EURACT Educational Agenda. European Academy of Teachers in General Practice EURACT, Leuven

    Google Scholar 

  2. Samuelson M, Aarendonk D (2012) Primary care at times of the economic crisis. Eur J Gen Pract 18(3):195–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cartier T, Bourgueil Y. France. In: Kringos DS, Boerma WGW, Hutchinson A, et al., editors. Building primary care in a changing Europe: Case studies [Internet]. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2015. (Observatory Studies Series, No. 40.) 9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459003/

  4. Chevreul K, Durand-Zaleski I, Bahrami SB, Hernández-Quevedo C, Mladovsky P (2010) France: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 12(6):1–xxii

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dourgnon P, Naiditch M (2010) The preferred doctor scheme: a political reading of a French experiment of gate-keeping. Health Policy 94(2):129–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Busse R, Blümel M, Knieps F, Bärnighausen T (2017) Statutory health insurance in Germany: a health system shaped by 135 years of solidarity, self-governance, and competition. Lancet 390(10097):882–897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohammadibakhsh R, Aryankhesal A, Jafari M, Damari B (2020) Family physician model in the health system of selected countries: a comparative study summary. J Educ Health Promot 9:160

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Simic D, Wilm S, Redaèlli M. Germany. In: Kringos DS, Boerma WGW, Hutchinson A, et al., editors. Building primary care in a changing Europe: Case studies [Internet]. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2015. (Observatory Studies Series, No. 40.) 10. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459004/

  9. Garattini L, Badinella Martini M, Zanetti M (2022) The Italian NHS at regional level: same in theory, different in practice. Eur J Health Econ 23(1):1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Garattini L, Curto A, Freemantle N (2016) Access to primary care in Italy: time for a shake-up? Eur J Health Econ 17(2):113–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Göktaş O (2017) Family medicine practice in Italy. SM J Fam Med 1(2):1013

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bernal-Delgado E, Garcia-Armesto S, Oliva J et al (2018) Spain: health system review. Health Syst Transit 20(2):1–179

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dedeu T, Bolibar B, Gené J, et al. Spain. In: Kringos DS, Boerma WGW, Hutchinson A, et al., editors. Building primary care in a changing Europe: Case studies [Internet]. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2015. (Observatory Studies Series, No. 40.) 27. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459029/

  14. Garattini L, Padula A (2019) Competition in health markets: is something rotten? J R Soc Med 112(1):6–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Garattini L, Zanetti M, Freemantle N (2020) The Italian NHS: what lessons to draw from COVID-19? Appl Health Econ Health Policy 18(4):463–466

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Garattini L, Bozzetto M, Remuzzi G, Freemantle N, Nobili A (2022) Primary care in a national health service: time for radical reform. Fam Pract 39(5):994–995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Garattini L, Badinella Martini M, Freemantle N, Nobili A (2022) Integrated care in a national health service: better horizontal than vertical for general practice? Fam Pract. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmac046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghorob A, Bodenheimer T (2012) Sharing the care to improve access to primary care. N Engl J Med 366(21):1955–1957

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No sources of funding were used to conduct this study or prepare this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pier Mannuccio Mannucci.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Livio Garattini, Alessandro Nobili, Marco Badinella Martini and Pier Mannuccio Mannucci have no conflicts of interest directly relevant to this article.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garattini, L., Nobili, A., Badinella Martini, M. et al. The role of general practitioners in the EU: time to draw lessons from a too wide range?. Intern Emerg Med 18, 343–346 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-023-03205-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-023-03205-y

Keywords

Navigation