Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical impact of vital sign abnormalities in patients admitted with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an observational study using continuous wireless monitoring

  • IM - ORIGINAL
  • Published:
Internal and Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Early detection of abnormal vital signs is critical for timely management of acute hospitalised patients and continuous monitoring may improve this. We aimed to assess the association between preceding vital sign abnormalities and serious adverse events (SAE) in patients hospitalised with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Two hundred patients’ vital signs were wirelessly and continuously monitored with peripheral oxygen saturation, heart rate, and respiratory rate during the first 4 days after admission for AECOPD. Non-invasive blood pressure was also measured every 30–60 min. The primary outcome was occurrence of SAE according to international definitions within 30 days and physiological data were analysed for preceding vital sign abnormalities. Data were presented as the mean cumulative duration of vital sign abnormalities per 24 h and analysed using Wilcoxon rank sum test. SAE during ongoing continuous monitoring occurred in 50 patients (25%). Patients suffering SAE during the monitoring period had on average 455 min (SD 413) per 24 h of any preceding vital sign abnormality versus 292 min (SD 246) in patients without SAE, p = 0.08, mean difference 163 min [95% CI 61–265]. Mean duration of bradypnea (respiratory rate < 11 min−1) was 48 min (SD 173) compared with 30 min (SD 84) in patients without SAE, p = 0.01. In conclusion, the duration of physiological abnormalities was substantial in patients with AECOPD. There were no statistically significant differences between patients with and without SAE in the overall duration of preceding physiological abnormalities.

Study registration: http://ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03660501). Date of registration: Sept 6 2018.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. World health organization (2020) Global health estimates 2020: deaths by cause, age, sex, by Country and by region, 2000–2019

  2. National health service England (2014) Overview of potential to reduce lives lost from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/rm-fs-6.pdf. Accessed 19 Oct 2021

  3. Perera P, Armstrong E, Sherrill D, Skrepnek G (2012) Acute exacerbations of COPD in the United States: Inpatient burden and predictors of costs and mortality. COPD J Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis 9:131–141. https://doi.org/10.3109/15412555.2011.650239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Groenewegen KH, Schols AM, Wouters EFM (2003) Mortality and mortality-related factors after hospitalization for acute exacerbation of COPD. Chest 124:459–467. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.124.2.459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McGloin H, Adam SK, Singer M (1999) Unexpected deaths and referrals to intensive care of patients on general wards. are some cases potentially avoidable? J R Coll Physicians Lond 33:255–259

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schein RMH, Hazday N, Pena M, Ruben BH, Sprung CL (1990) Clinical antecedents to in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Chest 98:1388–1392. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.98.6.1388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Buist MD, Jarmolowski E, Burton PR, Bernard SA, Waxman BP, Anderson J (1999) Recognising clinical instability in hospital patients before cardiac arrest or unplanned admission to intensive care. a pilot study in a tertiary-care hospital. Med J Aust 171:22–25. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1999.tb123492.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alam N, Hobbelink EL, van Tienhoven AJ, van de Ven PM, Jansma EP, Nanayakkara PWB (2014) The impact of the use of the early warning Score (EWS) on patient outcomes: a systematic review. Resuscitation 85:587–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.01.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elvekjaer M, Aasvang EK, Olsen RM, Sørensen HBD, Porsbjerg CM, Jensen JU, Haahr-Raunkjær C, Meyhoff CS (2020) Physiological abnormalities in patients admitted with acute exacerbation of COPD : an observational study with continuous monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput 34:1051–1060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00415-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haahr-Raunkjær C, Meyhoff CS, Sørensen HBD, Olsen RM, Aasvang EK (2017) Technological aided assessment of the acutely ill patient—the case of postoperative complications. Eur J Intern Med 45:41–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2017.09.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Elvekjaer M, Carlsson CJ, Rasmussen SM, Porsbjerg CM, Gronbæk KK, Haahr-Raunkjær C, Sorensen HBD, Aasvang EK, Meyhoff CS (2021) Agreement between wireless and standard measurements of vital signs in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a clinical validation study. Physiol Meas 42:055006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ac010c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pedersen NE, Rasmussen LS, Petersen JA, Gerds TA, Østergaard D, Lippert A (2018) A critical assessment of early warning score records in 168,000 patients. J Clin Monit Comput 32:109–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-017-0003-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. International council for harmonisation of technical requirements for pharmaceuticals for human use (2016) ICH harmonised guideline: integrated addendum to ICH E6(R1): guideline for good clinical practice E6(R2)

  14. Calzavacca P, Licari E, Tee A, Egi M, Haase M, Haase-Fielitz A, Bellomo R (2008) A prospective study of factors influencing the outcome of patients after a medical emergency team review. Intensive Care Med 34:2112–2116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1229-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kellett J, Sebat F (2017) Make vital signs great again—a call for action. Eur J Intern Med 45:13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2017.09.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McGain F, Cretikos MA, Jones D, van Dyk S, Buist MD, Opdam H, Pellegrino V, Robertson MS, Bellomo R (2008) Documentation of clinical review and vital signs after major surgery. Med J Aust 189:380–383. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb02083.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith MEB, Chiovaro JC, O’Neil M, Kansagara D, Quiñones AR, Freeman M, Motu’apuaka ML, Slatore CG (2014) Early warning system scores for clinical deterioration in hospitalized patients: a systematic review. Ann Am Thorac Soc 11:1454–1465. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201403-102OC

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Petersen JA, Mackel R, Antonsen K, Rasmussen LS (2014) Serious adverse events in a hospital using early warning score—what went wrong? Resuscitation 85:1699–1703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.08.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Difonzo M (2019) Performance of the afferent limb of rapid response systems in managing deteriorating patients: a systematic review. Crit Care Res Pract 2019:6902420. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6902420

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Taenzer AH, Pyke J, Herrick MD, Dodds TM, McGrath SP (2014) A comparison of oxygen saturation data in inpatients with low oxygen saturation using automated continuous monitoring and intermittent manual data charting. Anesth Analg 118:326–331. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Driscoll BR, Bakerly ND, Murphy P, Decalmer S, Kane B, Nasir AA, Simpson F, Turkington PM (2013) Concerns regarding the design of the bedside monitoring chart for use with the NEWS (national early warning system). Clin Med 13:319–320. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.13-3-319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kane B, Decalmer S, Murphy P, Turkington P, O’Driscoll B (2012) S29 The proposed national early warning system (NEWS) could be hazardous for patients who are at risk of hypercapnic respiratory failure. Thorax 67:A16-17. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202678.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leenen JPL, Leerentveld C, van Dijk JD, van Westreenen HL, Schoonhoven L, Patijn GA (2020) Current evidence for continuous vital signs monitoring by wearable wireless devices in hospitalized adults: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 22:e18636. https://doi.org/10.2196/18636

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Bowton DL, Scuderi PE, Haponik EF (1994) The incidence and effect on outcome of hypoxemia in hospitalized medical patients. Am J Med 97:38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(94)90046-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bleyer AJ, Vidya S, Russell GB, Jones CM, Sujata L, Daeihagh P, Hire D (2011) Longitudinal analysis of one million vital signs in patients in an academic medical center. Resuscitation 82:1387–1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.06.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. MacDonald MI, Shafuddin E, King PT, Chang CL, Bardin PG, Hancox RJ (2016) Cardiac dysfunction during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet Respir Med 4:138–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00509-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sun Z, Sessler DI, Dalton JE, Devereaux P, Shahinyan A, Naylor AJ, Hutcherson MT, Finnegan PS, Tandon V, Darvish-Kazem S, Chugh S, Alzayer H, Kurz A (2015) Postoperative hypoxemia is common and persistent: a prospective blinded observational study. Anesth Analg 121:709–715. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Gögenur I, Rosenberg-Adamsen S, Lie C, Carstensen M, Rasmussen V, Rosenberg J (2004) Relationship between nocturnal hypoxaemia, tachycardia and myocardial ischaemia after major abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth 93:333–338. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeh208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Duus C, Aasvang E, Olsen R, Sørensen H, Jørgensen L, Achiam M, Meyhoff C (2018) Continuous vital sign monitoring after major abdominal surgery—quantification of micro events. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 62:1200–1208. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jeffs E, Vollam S, Young JD, Horsington L, Lynch B, Watkinson PJ (2016) Wearable monitors for patients following discharge from an intensive care unit: practical lessons learnt from an observational study. J Adv Nurs 72:1851–1862. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Churpek MM, Adhikari R, Edelson DP (2016) The value of vital sign trends for detecting clinical deterioration on the wards. Resuscitation 102:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.02.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Khanna AK, Hoppe P, Saugel B (2019) Automated continuous noninvasive ward monitoring: future directions and challenges. Critical Care 23:194. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2485-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Michard F, Sessler DI (2018) Ward monitoring 3.0. Br J Anaesth 121:999–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.07.032

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Clifton L, Clifton DA, Pimentel MAF, Watkinson PJ, Tarassenko L (2014) Predictive monitoring of mobile patients by combining clinical observations with data from wearable sensors. IEEE J Biomed Heal Informatics 18:722–730. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2013.2293059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Churpek MM, Yuen TC, Winslow C, Meltzer DO, Kattan MW, Edelson DP (2016) Multicenter comparison of machine learning methods and conventional regression for predicting clinical deterioration on the wards. Crit Care Med 44:368–374. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000001571

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Lundberg SM, Nair B, Vavilala MS, Horibe M, Eisses MJ, Adams T, Liston DE, Low DK-W, Newman S-F, Kim J, Lee S-I (2018) Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery. Nat Biomed Eng 2:749–760. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-018-0304-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The WARD-project receives core support from the Innovation Fund Denmark (8056-00055B); the Danish Cancer Society (R150-A9865-16-S48); Copenhagen Center for Health Technology (CACHET); Radiometer Medical Aps; Isansys Ltd; A.P. Møller Foundation and from Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Rigshospitalet and the Technical University of Denmark. No sponsor had any role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The guarantor of the study is CSM, EKA, and HBDS, from conception and design to conduct of the study, interpretation of results, and revision of the manuscript. ME was responsible for measurements, conducted data analyses and drafted the manuscript. SMR, KKG, CMP, JUJ, CHR, JM, and MS contributed to conception and design of the study and revised the manuscript. All the co-authors have provided important intellectual input and contributed considerably to the analyses and interpretation of the data. All the authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikkel Elvekjaer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

CSM, EKA and HBDS have founded a start-up company, WARD247 ApS, with the aim of pursuing the regulatory and commercial activities of the WARD-project. WARD247 ApS has obtained license agreement for any WARD-project software and patents. One patent has been filed: “Wireless Assessment of Respiratory and circulatory Distress (WARD)–Clinical Support System (CSS)–an automated clinical support system to improve patient safety and outcomes”. None of the above entities has influence on the study design, conduct, analysis, or reporting. CSM also reports direct and indirect research funding from Merck, Sharp and Dohme Corp. and Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work as well as lecture fees from Radiometer. EKA also reports institutional research funding from Norpharma A/S outside the submitted work as well as lecture fees from Radiometer. ME: received departmental funding from Merck, Sharp and Dohme Corp outside the submitted work.

Human and animal rights

All the procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Approval was granted by the Danish Ethics Committee for the Capital Region (H-18026653).

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all the participating patients. Participants provided informed consent for publication as part of the written informed consent material.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 40 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elvekjaer, M., Rasmussen, S.M., Grønbæk, K.K. et al. Clinical impact of vital sign abnormalities in patients admitted with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an observational study using continuous wireless monitoring. Intern Emerg Med 17, 1689–1698 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-022-02988-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-022-02988-w

Keywords

Navigation