Skip to main content
Log in

Follow-up management of patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants

  • IM - ORIGINAL
  • Published:
Internal and Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last years, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have radically changed and simplified the therapeutic approach and management of patients on anticoagulant therapy. For these patients, international guidelines recommend to set up a regular follow-up (every 1–6 months) to re-enforce education, to ensure adequate adherence and persistence to treatment. In real-life setting, the application of the suggested follow-up regimens and incidence rates of thrombotic and bleeding complications related to the intensity of follow-up strategies has not been described. We conducted a multicentre, retrospective study at 4 Italian Thrombosis Centres to describe follow-up strategies of patients on DOACs treatment and to assess the incidence of bleeding and thrombotic complications. We enrolled 534 patients, with median follow-up 24 months: 52.1% had < 3 visits/year (group 1), while 47.9% required ≥ 3 visits/year (group 2). Mean age and gender were similar between the 2 groups, while severe anaemia (4.4% and 1.2%, p 0.03) and creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min were more common in group 2 (26.8% and 17.8%, p 0.02). The incidence of thromboembolic events was 3.9% in group 2 and 1.1% in group 1 (p 0.03). Major bleeding rates were non-significantly higher in group 2, whereas non-major bleeding rates occurred significantly more frequently in group 2 (26.6% and 18.7%, respectively, p 0.03). A tailored follow-up program is of critical importance to correctly manage patients on DOACs. A less intense follow-up management is feasible and safe for a substantial proportion of patients, provided they are carefully identified at specialized centres.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J et al (2016) Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease. Chest guideline and expert panel report. Chest 149:315–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D et al (2016) 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 50(5):e1–e88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Steffel J, Verhamme P, Potpara TS, Albaladejo P et al (2018) The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 39(16):1330–1393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Witt DM, Nieuwlaat R, Clark NP et al (2018) American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: optimal management of anticoagulation therapy. Blood Adv 2(22):3257–3291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Prisco D, Ageno W, Becattini C et al (2017) Italian intersociety consensus on DOAC use in internal medicine. Intern Emerg Med 12(3):387–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Parretti D, Grilli P, Bastiani F et al (2018) Documento di consensus SIMG-FCSA sulle corrette procedure di anticoagulazione. https://www.simg.it/Riviste/rivista_simg/2018/03_2018/completa.pdf

  7. Schulman S, Kearon C, Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (2005) Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost 3(4):692–694

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Reinecke H, Brand E, Mesters R et al (2009) Dilemmas in the management of atrial fibrillation in chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 20:705–711

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rattazzi M, Villalta S, De Lucchi L et al (2017) Chronic kidney disease is associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism recurrence. Thromb Res 160:32–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Prisco D, Cenci C, Silvestri E et al (2015) Novel oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: which novel oral anticoagulant for which patient? J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 16(7):512–519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamashita Y, Morimoto T, Amano H et al (2019) COMMAND VTE Registry Investigators. Influence of baseline anemia on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with venous thromboembolism: from the COMMAND VTE registry. J Thromb Thrombolysis 47(3):444–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hung SH, Lin HC, Chung SD (2015) Association between venous thromboembolism and iron-deficiency anemia: a population-based study. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 26(4):368–372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R et al (2010) Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the Euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest 137:263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cushman M (2007) Epidemiology and risk factors for venous thrombosis. Semin Hematol 44(2):62–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fang MC, Go AS, Hylek EM et al (2006) Age and the risk of warfarin-associated hemorrhage: the anticoagulation and risk factors in atrial fibrillation study. J Am Geriatr Soc 54(8):1231–1236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fohtung RB, Novak E, Rich MW (2017) Effect of new oral anticoagulants on prescribing practices for atrial fibrillation in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 65:2405–2412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharma M, Cornelius VR, Patel JP et al (2015) Efficacy and harms of direct oral anticoagulants in the elderly for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation 132(3):194–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Huisman MV, Rothman KJ, Paquette M et al (2017) GLORIA-AF investigators. The changing landscape for stroke prevention in AF: findings from the GLORIA-AF registry phase 2. J Am Coll Cardiol 69:777–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Barnes GD, Lucas E, Alexander GC et al (2015) National trends in ambulatory oral anticoagulant use. Am J Med 128:1300–1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Valencia D, Spoutz P, Stoppi J et al (2019) Impact of a direct oral anticoagulant population management tool on anticoagulation therapy monitoring in clinical practice. Ann Pharmacother 53(8):806–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiara Fantoni.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Walter Ageno received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, BMS-Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Portola, Aspen, Sanofi and research support from Bayer Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work. 

Statement of human and animal rights

 The study is consistent with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki of clinical research involving human subjects.

Informed consent

Due to the retrospective nature of the study, an informed consent was waived.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fantoni, C., Bertù, L., Galliazzo, S. et al. Follow-up management of patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants. Intern Emerg Med 16, 571–580 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-020-02433-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-020-02433-w

Keywords

Navigation