Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of pre-sowing magnetic field exposure of seeds to stationary magnetic field on growth, reactive oxygen species and photosynthesis of maize under field conditions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acta Physiologiae Plantarum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Impact of pre-sowing exposure of seeds to static magnetic field were studied on 1 month old maize [Zea mays . var: HQPM.1] plants under field conditions. Pre-standardized magnetic field strength of 100 mT (2 h) and 200 mT (1 h), which were proven best for improving different seedling parameters under laboratory condition, were used for this study. Magnetic field treatment altered growth, superoxide radical level, antioxidant enzymes and photosynthesis. Among the different growth parameters, leaf area and root length were the most enhanced parameters (78–40%, respectively), over untreated plants. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy study showed that superoxide radical was reduced and hydroxyl radical was unaffected after magnetic field treatment. With decrease in free radical content, antioxidant enzymes like superoxide dismutase and peroxidase were also reduced by 43 and 23%, respectively, in plants that emerged from magnetically treated seeds. Measurement of Chlorophyll a fluorescence by plant efficiency analyzer showed that the potential of processing light energy through photosynthetic machinery was enhanced by magnetic field treatment. Performance index of the plant enhanced up to two-fold and phenomenological leaf model showed more active reaction centers after magnetic field treatment. Among the two field strengths used, 200 mT (1 h) was more effective in altering all these parameters. It is concluded that pre-sowing magnetic field treatment can be effectively used for improving plant growth and development under field conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DMPO:

5,5′-Dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide

PBN:

Phenyl N-tert-butyl nitrone

POD:

Peroxidase

SOD:

Superoxide dismutase

PSII:

Photosystem II

F0 :

Initial fluorescence

Fm:

Maximum fluorescence

Fv :

Variable fluorescence

φpo:

Maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry (=F v/F M)

ψ0 :

Capacity of PSII to transfer trapped excitation that can move an electron into the electron transport chain further than Q A

φE o :

Quantum yield of electron transport

PIABS :

Performance index based on absorption

RC:

reaction centre

ET:

flux of electrons from Q A into the intersystem electron transport chain

TR:

excitation energy flux trapped by a RC and utilized for the reduction of QA to Q A

References

  • Ahmad M, Galland P, Ritz T, Wiltschko R, Wiltschko W (2007) Magnetic intensity affects cryptochrome-controlled response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 225:615–624

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Akoyunoglou G (1964) Effect of magnetic field on carboxydismutase. Nature 202:452–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aladjadjiyan A, Ylieva T (2003) Influence of stationary magnetic field on the early stages of the development of tobacco seeds (Nicotiana tabacum L.). J Cent Eur Agr 4:132–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander MP, Doijode SD (1995) Electromagnetic field. a novel tool to increase germination and seedling vigor of conserved onion (Allium cepa L.) and rice (Oryza sativa L.) seeds with low viability. Plant Genet Res Newsletter 104:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp CO, Fridovich I (1971) Superoxide dismutase: improved assay and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 44:276–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore RP (1982) Magnetotactic bacteria. Ann Rev Microbiol 36:217–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carbonell MV, Martinez E, Florez M, Maqueda R, Pintor-Lopez A, Amaya JM (2008) Magnetic field treatments improve germination and seedling growth in Festuca arundinacea Schreb. and Lolium perenne L. Seed Sci Technol 36:31–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Chance B, Maehly AC (1955) Assay of catalases and peroxidases. In: Colowick SP, Kaplan NO (eds) Methods in enzymology, vol II. Academic Press, New York, pp 764–775

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dayal S, Singh RP (1986) Effect of seed exposure to magnetic field on the height of tomato plants. Indian J Agric Sci 56:483–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicarlo AL, Hargis MT, Penafiel LM, Litovitz TA (1999) Short term magnetic field exposure (60 Hz) induces protection against ultraviolet radiation damage. Int J Rad Biol 75:1541–1549

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faqenabi F, Tajbakhsh M, Bernoosi I, Saber-Rezaii M, Tahri F, Parvizi S, Izadkhah M, Gorttapeh AH, Sedqi H (2009) The effect of magnetic field on growth, development and yield of Safflower and its comparison with other treatments. Res J Biol Sci 4:174–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Florez M, Carbonell MV, Martinez E (2007) Exposure of maize seeds to stationary magnetic fields: Effects on germination and early growth. Environ Expt Bot 59:68–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galland P, Pazur A (2005) Magnetoreception in plants. J Plant Res 118:371–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giannopolitis CN, Ries K (1977) Superoxide dismutases. I. Occurrences in higher plants. Plant Physiol 59:309–314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Govindjee (1995) Sixty-three years since Kautsky: chlorophyll a fluorescence. Aust J Plant Physiol 22:131–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal HS, Maheswari BL (2010) Magnetic treatment of irrigation water and snow pea and chickpea seeds enhances early growth and nutrient contents of seedlings. Bioelectromagnetics 32(1):58–65. doi:10.1002/bem.20615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans C, Smeyers M, Rodriguez RM, Eyletters M, Strasser RJ, Delhaye JP (2003) Quality assessment of urban trees: a comparative study of physiological characterisation, airborne imaging and on site fluorescence monitoring by the OJIP-test. J Plant Physiol 160:81–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hiscox JD, Israelstam GF (1979) A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration. Can J Bot 57:1332–1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain K, Kataria S, Guruprasad KN (2004) Oxyradicals under UV-B stress and their quenching by antioxidants. Indian J Exp Biol 42:884–892

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kavi P (1983) The effect of non-homogeneous gradient magnetic field susceptibility values in situ ragi seed material. Mysore J Agr Sci 17:121–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Knecht KT, Mason RP (1993) In vivo spin trapping of xenobiotic free radical metabolites. Arch Biochem Biophys 303:185–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liszkay A, Kenk B, Schopfer P (2003) Evidence for the involvement of cell wall peroxidase in the generation of hydroxyl radicals mediating extension growth. Planta 217:658–667

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry HO, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurements with Folin reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin H, Lindauer M (1977) Der einfluss der erdmagnetfelds and die schwereorientierung der honigbiene. J Comp Physiol 122:145–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000) Chlorophyll fluorescence: a practical guide. J Exp Bot 51:659–668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pietruszewski S, Kornarzyński (1999) Magnetic biostimulation of wheat seeds. Int Agrophysics 13:497–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Podlesny J, Pietruszwski S, Kornarzynski K (2002) Efficiency of magnetic biostimulation in broad bean cultivated in the experimental plot conditions. Int Agrophys 18:65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajendra P, Nayak HS, Sashidhar RB, Subramanyam C, Devendarnath D, Gunasekaran B, Aradhya RSS, Bhaskaran A (2005) Effects of power frequency electromagnetic fields on growth of germinating Vicia faba L., the broad bean. Eletromagn Biol Med 24:39–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritz T, Adem S, Schulten K (2000) A model for photoreceptor-based magnetoreception in birds. Biophys J 78:707–718

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen GM, Rauckman EJ (1984) Spin trapping of superoxide and hydroxyl radicals. Methods of enzymology, Ornaldo : Academic press 105:198–209

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ružič R, Jerman I (2002) Weak magnetic field decreases heat stress in cress seedlings. Electromagnetic Biol Med 21:69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler D (2004) Molecular analysis of a subcellular compartment: the magnetosome membrane in Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense. Arch Microbiol 181:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shine MB, Guruprasad KN, Anjali A (2011) Enhancement of germination, growth and photosynthesis in soybean by pre-treatment of seeds with magnetic field. Bioelectromagnetics doi: 10.1002/bem.20656

  • Srivastava A, Strasser RJ, Govindjee (1999) Greening of peas: parallel measurements of 77 K emission spectra, OJIP chlorophyll a fluorescence transient, period four oscillation of the initial fluorescence level, delayed light emission, and P700. Photosynthetica 37:365–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strasser RJ, Srivastava A, Govindjee (1995) Polyphasic chlorophyll a fluorescence transients in plants and cyanobacteria. Photochem Photobiol 61:32–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strasser RJ, Tsimilli-Micheal, Srivastava A (2000) The fluorescence transient as a tool to characterize and screen photosynthetic samples. In: Yunus M, Pathre U, Mohnanty P (eds) Probing Photosynthesis: mechanisms, regulation and adaptation. Taylor and Francis, London, UK, pp 445–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Strasser RJ, Tsimilli-Micheal, Srivastava A (2004) Analysis of the chlorophyll a fluorescence transient. In: Papageorgiou GC, Govindjee (eds) A signature of Photosynthesis, Advances in photosynthesis and respiration, vol 19. Springer, Netherlands, pp 321–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakharia DN, Davariya RL, Parameswaran M (1991) Influence of magnetic treatment on groundnut yield and yield attributes. Indian J Plant Physiol 34:131–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Vashisth A, Nagarajan S (2008) Exposure of Seeds to Static Magnetic Field Enhances Germination and Early Growth Characteristics in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L). Bioelectromagnetics 29:571–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vashisth A, Nagarajan S (2010) Effect on germination and early growth characteristics in sunflower (Helianthus annuus) seeds exposed to static magnetic field. J Plant Physiol 167:149–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walters C (1998) Understanding the mechanism and kinetics of seed ageing. Seed Sci Res 8:223–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wellburn AR, Lichtenthaler H (1984) Formulae and programme to determine total carotenoids and chlorophyll a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. In: Sybesma C (ed) Advances in Photosynthesis Research. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Boston, pp 9–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiltschko W, Wiltschko R (1972) Magnetic compass of European robins. Science 176:62–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiltschko W, Wiltschko R (2005) Magnetic orientation and magnetoreception in birds and other animals. J Comp Physiol 191:675–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zepeda-Bautista R, Hernández-Aguilar C, Domínguez-Pacheco A, Cruz-Orea A, Godina-Nava JJ, Martínez-Ortíz E (2010) Electromagnetic field and seed vigour of corn hybrids. Int Agrophys 24:329–332

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Tushar Banerjee, Lecturer, School of life Sciences DAVV, Indore for his help in EPR measurements and Dr. Anjali Anand, NRL, IARI, Delhi for her suggestions during the preparation of this manuscript. This work was financially supported by ICAR, [NFBSRA/PCN/AP-09/2006-07] Delhi, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. B. Shine.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Horbowicz.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 180 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shine, M.B., Guruprasad, K.N. Impact of pre-sowing magnetic field exposure of seeds to stationary magnetic field on growth, reactive oxygen species and photosynthesis of maize under field conditions. Acta Physiol Plant 34, 255–265 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-011-0824-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-011-0824-7

Keywords

Navigation