Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Functional and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in obese men: a matched-pair analysis

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in men with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m2 is considered technically challenging. We conducted a retrospective matched-pair analysis to compare the oncological and functional outcomes of RARP in men with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2. We interrogated our prospectively maintained RARP database and identified 1273 men who underwent RARP from January 2018 till June 2021. Among them, 43 had BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2, and 1230 had BMI < 35 kg/m2. A 1:1 genetic matching was performed between these two groups for PSA, Gleason grades, clinical stage, D'Amico risk stratification, and nerve-spare extent. Continence rates and biochemical rates on 1-year follow-up were analysed. We performed statistical analysis using SPSS, and Paired tests were done using Wilcoxon sign rank-sum test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The two groups were comparable in almost all parameters except for age. Console time (p = 0.20) and estimated blood loss (p > 0.90) were not significantly different. There was no blood transfusion, open conversion or (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ 3) intra/postoperative complication in either of the two groups. The two groups did not have any difference in biochemical recurrence rates (BCR) on 1-year follow-up (p > 0.90). Men with BMI ≥ 35 achieved continence rates equivalent to men with BMI < 35 within 1 year. On logistic regression analysis, age (p < 0.001) and extent of nerve sparing (p = 0.026) emerged as significant factors influencing continence recovery. RARP is safe in men with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2. The 1-year continence and oncological outcomes are similar to matched men with BMI < 35 kg/m2 undergoing RARP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials used in the study

Available on request.

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A et al (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cancer Tomorrow [Internet]. https://gco.iarc.fr/tomorrow/en/dataviz/isotype?cancers=27&single_unit=50000&years=2040&types=1. Accessed 29 Jan 2023

  3. Cancer Tomorrow [Internet]. https://gco.iarc.fr/tomorrow/en/dataviz/isotype?cancers=27&single_unit=500&years=2040&types=0&populations=826. Accessed 29 Jan 2023

  4. Agha M, Agha R (2017) The rising prevalence of obesity: part A: impact on public health. Int J Surg Oncol 2(7):e17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kadono Y, Ueno S, Makino T, Makino T, Ofude M, Izumi K et al (2014) Intrapelvic fat makes robot-assisted radical prostatectomy difficult. Anticancer Res 34(10):5523–5528

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Herman MP, Raman JD, Dong S, Samadi D, Scherr DS (2007) Increasing body mass index negatively impacts outcomes following robotic radical prostatectomy. JSLS 11(4):438–442

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Busch J, Gonzalgo ML, Leva N, Ferrari M, Cash H, Kempkensteffen C et al (2015) Matched comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy regarding pathologic and oncologic outcomes in obese patients. World J Urol 33(3):397–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Khaira HS, Bruyere F, Bruyere F, Bruyère F, O’Malley PJ, O’Malley PJ et al (2006) Does obesity influence the operative course or complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. BJUI 98(6):1275–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abdul-Muhsin H, Giedelman C, Samavedi S, Schatloff O, Coelho RF, Rocco B et al (2014) Perioperative and early oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in morbidly obese patients: a propensity score-matched study. BJUI 113(1):84–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Han H, Cao Z, Qin Y, Wei X, Ruan Y, Cao Y et al (2020) Morbid obesity is adversely associated with perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Can Urol Assoc J 14(11):E574–E581

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Vineet A, Agrawal V, Changyong F, Feng C, Jean J, Joseph JV (2014) Outcomes of extra-peritoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the morbidly obese: a propensity score-matched study. J Endourol 29(6):677–682

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yates J, Munver R, Sawczuk I (2011) Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the morbidly obese patient. Prostate Cancer 2011:618623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sekhon JS (2011) Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimisation: the matching package for R. J Stat Softw 14(42):1–52

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ho D, Imai K, King G, Stuart EA (2011) MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. J Stat Softw 14(42):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  15. R: The R Project for Statistical Computing [Internet]. https://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 17 Feb 2022

  16. Hu M, Xu H, Bai PD, Jiang H, Ding Q (2014) Obesity has multifaceted impact on biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis of 36,927 patients. Med Oncol 31(2):829–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rivera-Izquierdo M, Pérez de Rojas J, Martínez-Ruiz V, Pérez-Gómez B, Sánchez MJ, Khan KS et al (2021) Obesity as a risk factor for prostate cancer mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of 280,199 patients. Cancers 13(16):4169

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Choban PS, Flancbaum L (1997) The impact of obesity on surgical outcomes: a review. J Am Coll Surg 185(6):593–603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kopp RP, Han M, Partin AW, Humphreys E, Freedland SJ, Parsons JK (2011) Obesity and prostate enlargement in men with localised prostate cancer. BJU Int 108(11):1750–1755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Parikesit D, Mochtar CA, Umbas R, Hamid ARAH (2016) The impact of obesity towards prostate diseases. Prostate Int 4(1):1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chughtai B, Lee R, Te A, Kaplan S (2011) Role of Inflammation in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Rev Urol 13(3):147–150

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaaks R, Stattin P (2010) Obesity, endogenous hormone metabolism, and prostate cancer risk: a conundrum of “highs” and “lows.” Cancer Prev Res Phila Pa 3(3):259–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shapiro DD, Davis JW, Williams WH, Chapin BF, Ward JF, Pettaway CA et al (2022) Increased body mass index is associated with operative difficulty during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJUI Compass 3(1):68–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Crocitto LE, Ly M, Satterthwaite R, Wilson T, Nelson RA (2008) Can robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy be recommended to obese patients? J Robot Surg 1(4):297–302

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Goßler C, May M, Rosenhammer B, Breyer J, Stojanoski G, Weikert S et al (2020) Obesity leads to a higher rate of positive surgical margins in the context of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Results of a prospective multicenter study. Cent Eur J Urol. 73(4):457–465

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jayachandran J, Aronson WJ, Terris MK, Presti JC, Amling CL, SEARCH Database Study Group et al (2008) obesity and positive surgical margins by anatomic location after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database. BJU Int 102(8):964–968

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ramahi EH, Ansley KC, Jackson MW, Basler JW, Du F, Swanson GP (2012) Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence in obese patients with intermediate- and high-grade prostate cancer with radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 30(5_suppl):50–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Suh J, Yoo S, Park J, Cho MC, Jeong CW, Ku JH et al (2020) Differences in risk factors for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy stratified by the degree of obesity: focused on surgical methods. Sci Rep 10(1):10157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Mourão TC, de Oliveira RAR, de Favaretto RL, Santana TBM, Sacomani CAR, Bachega W et al (2022) Should obesity be associated with worse urinary continence outcomes after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy a propensity score matching analysis. Int Braz J Urol Off J Braz Soc Urol 48(1):122–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wei Y, Wu YP, Lin MY, Chen SH, Lin YZ, Li XD et al (2018) Impact of obesity on long-term urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis. BioMed Res Int 3(2018):8279523

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hao H, Liu Y, Chen YK, Si LM, Zhang M, Fan Y et al (2021) Evaluating continence recovery time after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao 53(4):697–703

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gondoputro W, Thompson J, Evans M, Bolton D, Frydenberg M, Murphy DG et al (2022) How does age affect urinary continence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy? A prospective multi-institutional study using independently collected Validated Questionnaires. J Urol 207(5):1048–1056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sadri I, Arezki A, Zakaria AS, Couture F, Nguyen DD, Bousmaha N et al (2022) Age-stratified continence outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Can J Urol 29(5):11292–11299

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by DDC. The first draft of the manuscript was written by DDC and all the other authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danny Darlington Carbin Joseph.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical clearance

This retrospective study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was performed as an audit of obese men who underwent RARP in our unit. Audit number:SU-CA-21-22-104.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 23 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carbin Joseph, D.D., Dranova, S., Harrison, H. et al. Functional and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in obese men: a matched-pair analysis. J Robotic Surg 17, 2027–2033 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01607-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01607-w

Keywords

Navigation