Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Upper or lower tract approach for duplex anomalies? A bi-institutional comparative analysis of robot-assisted approaches

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optimal management of duplication anomalies may include an upper or lower tract surgical approach. In the contemporary era, the robot-assisted laparoscopic heminephrectomy (RALHN) and robot-assisted laparoscopic ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy (RALIUU) are viable interventions predicated on clinical, institutional and surgeon preferences. We present a multi-institutional comparative analysis aiming to compare the outcomes of RALHN and RALIUU to see if either of the approaches confers an advantage over the other in treating duplex renal anomalies needing intervention. We completed a retrospective review of consecutive children undergoing RALIUU at Hospital A and RALHN at Hospital B from January 2009 to March 2017. The primary outcome was ‘surgical success’ defined by the resolution of clinical symptoms, improved radiological parameters, and no unplanned subsequent interventions till the time of study completion. Secondary outcomes included operative parameters, complications, and subsequent urinary infections. There were 39 RALIUU and 28 RALHN. Baseline demographic and clinical parameters across two cohorts were similar. The primary outcome of ‘surgical success’ was 100% across both cohorts. There were no major surgical complications, and the incidence of postoperative urinary tract infection was minimal and similar for both groups. Operative time favored RALHN; blood loss and analgesic requirements were minimal in both cohorts. Both RALIUU and RALHN are definitive surgical interventions in children with complex duplex moieties, delivering satisfactory surgical outcomes with a low complication profile and marginal differences in the postoperative patient outcomes. This pilot bi-institutional study provides the basis for a larger collaboration to further define optimal techniques, standardize surgical care pathways, and interrogate long-term outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kapoor V, Elder JS (2015) Simultaneous bilateral robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedures in children. J Robot Surg 9(4):285–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-015-0528-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Esposito C, Escolino M, Miyano G, Caione P, Chiarenza F, Riccipetitoni G et al (2016) A comparison between laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic approach for partial nephrectomy in children with duplex kidney: a multicentric survey. World J Urol 34(7):939–948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1728-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Herz D, Smith J, McLeod D, Schober M, Preece J, Merguerian P (2016) Robot-assisted laparoscopic management of duplex renal anomaly: Comparison of surgical outcomes to traditional pure laparoscopic and open surgery. J Pediatr Urol 12(1):44.e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.04.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Timberlake MD, Corbett ST (2015) Minimally invasive techniques for management of the ureterocele and ectopic ureter: upper tract versus lower tract approach. Urol Clin North Am 42(1):61–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2014.09.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McLeod DJ, Alpert SA, Ural Z, Jayanthi VR (2014) Ureteroureterostomy irrespective of ureteral size or upper pole function: a single center experience. J Pediatr Urol 10(4):616–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.05.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sheth KR, White JT, Janzen N, Koh CJ, Austin PF, Roth DR et al (2019) Evaluating Outcomes of Differential Surgical Management of Nonfunctioning Upper Pole Renal Moieties in Duplex Collecting Systems. Urology 123:198–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.06.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Michaud JE, Akhavan A (2017) Upper Pole Heminephrectomy Versus Lower Pole Ureteroureterostomy for Ectopic Upper Pole Ureters. Curr Urol Rep 18(3):21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-017-0664-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawal T, Srinivasan AK, Talwar R, Chu DI, Long C, Weiss D et al (2019) Ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy: does function of the obstructed moiety matter? J Pediatr Urol 15(1):50.e1-50.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.08.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Biles MJ, Finkelstein JB, Silva MV, Lambert SM, Casale P (2016) Innovation in Robotics and Pediatric Urology: Robotic Ureteroureterostomy for Duplex Systems with Ureteral Ectopia. J Endourol 30(10):1041–1048. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee NG, Corbett ST, Cobb K, Bailey GC, Burns AS, Peters CA (2015) Bi-Institutional Comparison of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Versus Open Ureteroureterostomy in the Pediatric Population. J Endourol 29(11):1237–1241. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kawal T, Srinivasan AK, Shrivastava D, Chu DI, Van Batavia J, Weiss D et al (2018) Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Does age matter? J Pediatr Urol 14(6):540.e1-540.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.04.023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Malik RD, Pariser JJ, Gundeti MS (2015) Outcomes in Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Heminephrectomy Compared with Contemporary Open and Laparoscopic Series. J Endourol 29(12):1346–1352. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0818

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Corbett ST, Burris MB, Herndon CD. Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy in a duplicated collecting system. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9(6 Pt B):1239.e1–1239.e12392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.07.017

  15. Jayram G, Roberts J, Hernandez A, Heloury Y, Manoharan S, Godbole P et al (2011) Outcomes and fate of the remnant moiety following laparoscopic heminephrectomy for duplex kidney: a multicenter review. J Pediatr Urol 7(3):272–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leavitt DA, Rambachan A, Haberman K, DeMarco R, Shukla AR (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy for ectopic ureters in children: description of technique. J Endourol 26(10):1279–1283. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2012.0041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gundeti MS, Ransley PG, Duffy PG, Cuckow PM, Wilcox DT (2005) Renal outcome following heminephrectomy for duplex kidney. J Urol 173(5):1743–1744. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000154163.67420.4d

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. De Caluwé D, Chertin B, Puri P (2002) Long-term outcome of the retained ureteral stump after lower pole heminephrectomy in duplex kidneys. Eur Urol 42(1):63–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00223-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Androulakakis PA, Stephanidis A, Antoniou A, Christophoridis C (2001) Outcome of the distal ureteric stump after (hemi)nephrectomy and subtotal ureterectomy for reflux or obstruction. BJU Int 88(6):586–589. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.02385.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this article. No competing financial interests or non-financial conflicts exist. The authors RS, MVR, TK, NB, AKS, MG and ARS declare that they have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Drs. ARS, MG and AKS conceived the research question and designed the study. They revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content and approved final draft. Drs. RS, MVR, TK, and NB were involved in the data abstraction, communications, statistical analysis and preparation of the manuscript. Together all the authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravindra Sahadev.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

IRB approved.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

The research findings were presented in the annual meeting of Society for Pediatric Urology, American Urologic Association, Chicago, May 2019.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sahadev, R., Rodriguez, M.V., Kawal, T. et al. Upper or lower tract approach for duplex anomalies? A bi-institutional comparative analysis of robot-assisted approaches. J Robotic Surg 16, 1321–1328 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01372-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01372-2

Keywords

Navigation