Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic robotic liver surgery: the Henri Mondor initial experience of 20 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laparoscopic liver surgery is now an established practice in many institutions. It is a safe and feasible approach in the hands of trained surgeons. The introduction of robotics into surgery represents progression in the field of minimally invasive surgery but has seen a slow uptake in the hepatopancreaticobiliary subspeciality. We report our initial experience in 20 cases of laparoscopic robotic liver resection (LRLR). From March 2011 to April 2013 patients with lesions within the liver were assessed and consented for laparoscopic robotic liver surgery. This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively kept database on preoperative details and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. During the time period there were 20 LRLRs. The median age was 62 years (range 39–80 years) with a male to female ratio of 14:6. Ten patients had left lateral sectionectomies, 10 patients had atypical segmental resections; 14 patients had resections for malignancies, 6 patients had resections for benign disease. One case was converted to open resection. The mean operating time was 176.4 ± 74.6 min (range 60–300 min), the mean blood loss was 107 ± 106 ml (range 50–700 ml) and the mean hospital stay was 6.5 ± 3.7 days (range 2–16 days). Two patients required blood transfusions. The incidence of postoperative complications was 10 % (n = 2). LRLR overcomes some of the disadvantages of conventional laparoscopic surgery. It is a technically feasible and safe approach for wedge resections and left lateral sectionectomy of the liver without oncological compromise. However, this surgical technique requires advanced laparoscopic skills and there is an associated steep learning curve. Further studies are needed to determine the potential advantages of this technique for the patient compared to the traditional laparoscopic approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(5):825–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250(5):831–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jacob BP, Gagner M (2003) Robotics and general surgery. Surg Clin N Am 83(6):1405–1419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ballantyne GH (2002) Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc 16(10):1389–1402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Germay O et al (2001) Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 25(11):1467–1477

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138(7):777–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hyung WJ (2007) Robotic surgery in gastrointestinal surgery. Korean J Gastroenterol 50(4):256–259

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ho CM, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H et al (2013) Systematic review of robotic liver resection. Surg Endosc 27(3):732–739

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pang YY (2000) The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2:333–39 (HPB (Oxford) 2002; 4(2):99; author reply 99-100)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Haverkamp L, Weijs TJ, van der Sluis PC et al (2013) Laparoscopic total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 27(5):1509–1520

    Google Scholar 

  12. Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L et al (2002) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 236(6):759–766 (discussion 767)

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pokala N, Sadhasivam S, Kiran RP, Parithivel V (2007) Am Surg 73(8):737–741 (discussion 741–2)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Ditto A et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multi-institutional cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 20(6):2007–2015

    Google Scholar 

  15. Abood GJ, Tsung A (2013) Robot-assisted surgery: improved tool for major liver resections? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20(5):151–156

    Google Scholar 

  16. Himpens J, Leman G, Cadiere GB (1998) Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 12(8):1091

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bertelsen A, Melo J, Sanchez E, Borro D (2012) A review of surgical robots for spinal interventions. Int J Med Robot. doi:10.1002/rcs.1469

  18. Elsamra SE, Leone AR, Lasser MS et al (2013) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes and cost. J Endourol 27(2):182–188

    Google Scholar 

  19. Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM et al (2010) Outcomes of robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients older than 70 years: a comparative study. World J Surg 34(9):2109–2114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Buchs NC, Bucher P, Pugin F et al (2010) Robot-assisted oncologic resection for large gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a preliminary case series. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20(5):411–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Berber E, Akyildiz HY, Aucejo F et al (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of liver tumours. HPB (Oxford) 12(8):583–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Choi GH, Choi SH, Kim SH et al (2012) Robotic liver resection: technique and results of 30 consecutive procedures. Surg Endosc 26(8):2247–2258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ji WB, Wang HG, Zhao ZM et al (2011) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: initial experience. Ann Surg 253(2):342–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chan OC, Tang CN, Lai EC et al (2011) Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a cohort study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18(4):471–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wakabayashi G, Sasaki A, Nishizuka S et al (2011) Our initial experience with robotic hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18(4):481–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Casciola L, Patriti A, Ceccarelli G et al (2011) Robot-assisted parenchymal-sparing liver surgery including lesions located in the posterosuperior segments. Surg Endosc 25(12):3815–3824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Sbrana F et al (2011) Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections. Surgery 149(1):29–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lai EC, Tang CN, Li MK (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomy: technique and surgical outcomes. Int J Surg 10(1):11–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Drs. Salloum, Subar, Memeo, Tayar, Laurent, Malek and Azoulay have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Memeo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salloum, C., Subar, D., Memeo, R. et al. Laparoscopic robotic liver surgery: the Henri Mondor initial experience of 20 cases. J Robotic Surg 8, 119–124 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-013-0437-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-013-0437-9

Keywords

Navigation