Skip to main content
Log in

Closed or Unclosed Mesentery? A Meta-analysis of Internal Herniation After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

  • Review
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure, closing mesentery or not was still controversial according to preexisted studies. So, the current meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcome of closure versus non-closure of mesenteric defects in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Fifteen studies were included, enrolling 53,488 patients. Based on the outcome of analysis, regarding internal hernia, Petersen space’s IH, jejunal mesenteric’s IH, hospital days, and reoperation, closure of the mesentery was better than non-closure. Besides, small bowel obstruction, anastomosis ulcer, stenosis, leakage, bleeding, gastrointestinal perforation, and postoperative BMI of patients show no difference between non-closure and closure.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

IH :

Internal herniation

LRYGB :

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

OR :

Odds ratio

CI :

Confidence interval

BMI :

Body mass index

PRISMA :

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

AMSTAR :

Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews

SD :

Standard deviation

MD :

Mean difference

NRCTs :

Non-randomized controlled trials

LSG :

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

LGB :

Laparoscopic gastric bypass

FPG :

Fasting plasma glucose

HbA1C :

Glycosylated hemoglobin, type A1C

BPD-DS :

Biliopancreatic diversion duodenal switch

T2DM :

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

RCTs :

Randomized controlled trials

References

  1. Retraction: Effects of microRNA-708 on epithelial-mesenchymal transition, cell proliferation, and apoptosis in melanoma cells by targeting LEF1 through the Wnt signaling pathway [J]. Pathol Oncol Res 2021; 27 1609917.

  2. Mechanick JI, Kushner RF, Sugerman HJ, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery medical guidelines for clinical practice for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient [J]. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009;17(Suppl 1):S1-70.

    Google Scholar 

  3. di Capua F, Uccelli M, Cesana GC, et al. An unexpected high rate of internal hernia in our OAGB experience as revisional surgery for morbid obesity [J]. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2021;116(5):609–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmed AR, Rickards G, Husain S, et al. Trends in internal hernia incidence after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [J]. Obes Surg. 2007;17(12):1563–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Madan AK, Lo Menzo E, Dhawan N, et al. Internal hernias and nonclosure of mesenteric defects during laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass [J]. Obes Surg. 2009;19(5):549–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanmugalingam N, Nizar S, Vasilikostas G, et al. Does closure of the mesenteric defects during antecolic laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity reduce the incidence of symptomatic internal herniation? [J]. Int J Surg. 2013;11(3):200–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;10:Ed000142.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu QL, Zheng T, Li SZ, et al. Effects of dapagliflozin in the progression of atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022;14(1):41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Aghajani E, Nergaard BJ, Leifson BG, et al. The mesenteric defects in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 5 years follow-up of non-closure versus closure using the stapler technique [J]. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(9):3743–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Amanda D, Elin P, Eva N, et al. The influence of mesenteric defects closure on the use of computed tomography for abdominal pain 5 years after laparoscopic gastric bypass-a post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial [J]. Obes Surg. 2022;32(2):266–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Amor IB, Kassir R, Debs T, et al. Impact of mesenteric defect closure during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB): a retrospective study for a total of 2093 LRYGB [J]. Obes Surg. 2019;29(10):3342–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Collard MK, Torcivia A, Genser L. Laparoscopic management of internal hernia after Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass [J]. J Visc Surg. 2020;157(5):423–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hope WW, Sing RF, Chen AY, et al. Failure of mesenteric defect closure after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [J]. Jsls. 2010;14(2):213–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ristensen SD, Gormsen J, Naver L, et al. Randomized clinical trial on closure versus non-closure of mesenteric defects during laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery [J]. Br J Surg. 2021;108(2):145–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lopera CA, Vergnaud JP, Cabrera LF, et al. Preventative laparoscopic repair of Petersen’s space following gastric bypass surgery reduces the incidence of Petersen’s hernia: a comparative study [J]. Hernia. 2018;22(6):1077–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Murakami K, Obama K, Kanaya S, et al. Mesenteric closure after laparoscopic total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction is effective for prevention of internal hernia: a multicenter retrospective study [J]. Surg Endosc. 2022;36(6):4181–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nuytens F, D’Hondt M, van Rooy F, et al. Closure of mesenteric defects is associated with a higher incidence of small bowel obstruction due to adhesions after laparoscopic antecolic Roux-en-y gastric bypass: a retrospective cohort study [J]. Int J Surg. 2019;71:149–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial [J]. Jama. 2018;319(3):255–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosas U, Ahmed S, Leva N, et al. Mesenteric defect closure in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(9):2486–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schneider R, Schulenburg M, Kraljević M, et al. Does the non-absorbable suture closure of the jejunal mesenteric defect reduce the incidence and severity of internal hernias after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass? [J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021;406(6):1831–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stenberg E, Ottosson J, Szabo E, et al. Comparing techniques for mesenteric defects closure in laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery-a register-based cohort study [J]. Obes Surg. 2019;29(4):1229–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Torensma B, Kooiman L, Liem R, et al. Internal herniation incidence after RYGB and the predictive ability of a CT scan as a diagnostic tool [J]. Obes Surg. 2021;31(1):127–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Geubbels N, Lijftogt N, Fiocco M, et al. Meta-analysis of internal herniation after gastric bypass surgery [J]. Br J Surg. 2015;102(5):451–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ortega J, Cassinello N, Sánchez-Antúnez D, et al. Anatomical basis for the low incidence of internal hernia after a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass without mesenteric closure [J]. Obes Surg. 2013;23(8):1273–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee InHee. The effect of postural control intervention for congenital muscular torticollis: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29(8):795–802. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215514555037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Topart P, Becouarn G, Finel JB. Is transit bipartition a better alternative to biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch for superobesity? Comparison of the early results of both procedures [J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(4):497–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: Qian-Long Wu. Analysis and interpretation: Qian-Long Wu, Quan-Zhen Liu, Ying-Yun Xi, Zi-Chun Xie. Quality assessment: Qian-Long Wu, Xiao-Qing Deng, Tong-Shan Xu, Jin-An Chen. Statistical analysis: Qian-Long Wu, Quan-Zhen Liu, Ying-Yun Xi, Yi Yuan. Writing the article: Qian-Long Wu, Quan-Zhen Liu, Ying-Yun Xi, Xiao-Qing Deng, Tong-Shan Xu, Zi-Chun Xie, Jin-An Chen, Yi Yuan. Critical revision of the article: Qian-Long Wu, Zi-Chun Xie, Jin-An Chen, Yi Yuan. Final approval of the article: Qian-Long Wu, Quan-Zhen Liu, Ying-Yun Xi, Xiao-Qing Deng, Tong-Shan Xu, Zi-Chun Xie, Jin-An Chen, Yi Yuan. Overall responsibility: Qian-Long Wu.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qian-Long Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Consent for Publication

The authors confirm: that the work described has not been published before; that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that all co-authors have approved its publication; that the responsible authorities have approved its publication at the institution where the work is carried out.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO CRD42022348883.

Key Points

1. The current meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcome of closure versus non-closure of mesenteric defects in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

2. Based on the outcome of analysis, regarding internal hernia, Petersen space’s IH, Jejunal mesenteric’s IH, hospital days, and reoperation, closure of the mesentery was better than non-closure.

3. Besides, small bowel obstruction, anastomosis ulcer, stenosis, leakage, bleeding, gastrointestinal perforation, and postoperative BMI of patients show no difference between non-closure and closure.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, QL., Liu, QZ., Xi, YY. et al. Closed or Unclosed Mesentery? A Meta-analysis of Internal Herniation After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. OBES SURG 33, 1900–1909 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06594-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06594-3

Keywords

Navigation