Skip to main content
Log in

Antireflux Mucosectomy Band (ARM-b) in Treatment of Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After Bariatric Surgery

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has become the most commonly used bariatric surgery worldwide. However, there are a proportion of patients who present with a refractory GERD after this procedure. In these patients, when surgical conversion to RYGPB is not possible or declined, we propose to describe the results of an endoscopic antireflux mucosectomy band (ARM-b) technique in 6 LSG patients with refractory GERD. The technical feasibility was 100%; 5 out of 6 patients had a clinical response with a reduction of the GERD-HRQL score of > 50%. Two patients had adverse events: one esophageal stricture and one benign bleeding. ARM-b is feasible and potentially effective to treat patients with refractory GERD after LSG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Sebastianelli L, Benois M, Vanbiervliet G, Bailly L, Robert M, Turrin N, et al. Systematic endoscopy 5 years after sleeve gastrectomy results in a high rate of barrett’s esophagus: results of a multicenter study. Obesity Surgery [Internet]. Springer New York LLC; 2019 [cited 2020 mar 18];29:1462–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30666544

  2. Jammu GS, Sharma R. A 7-year clinical audit of 1107 cases comparing sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-En-Y gastric bypass, and mini-gastric bypass, to determine an effective and safe bariatric and metabolic procedure. Obesity surgery [Internet]. Springer New York LLC; 2016 [cited 2020 mar 18];26:926–32. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26337694

  3. Daes J, Jimenez ME, Said N, Daza JC, Dennis R. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux can be reduced by changes in surgical technique. Obesity Surgery [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2020 mar 18];22:1874–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22915063

  4. Nocca D, Skalli EM, Boulay E, Nedelcu M, Michel Fabre J, Loureiro M. Nissen sleeve (N-sleeve) operation: preliminary results of a pilot study. Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery [Internet]. Elsevier Inc.; 2016 [cited 2020 mar 18];12:1832–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27234340

  5. Inoue H, Tanabe M, de Santiago ER, Abad MRA, Shimamura Y, Fujiyoshi Y, et al. Anti-reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) as a new treatment for gastroesophageal reflux refractory to proton pump inhibitors: a pilot study. Endoscopy International Open. Georg Thieme Verlag KG; 2020;08:E133–E138.

  6. Monino L, Gonzalez J-M, Vitton V, Barthet M. Antireflux mucosectomy band in treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a pilot study for safety, feasibility and symptom control. Endoscopy International Open [Internet]. Georg Thieme Verlag KG; 2020 [cited 2020 Mar 18];08:E147–54. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32010747

  7. Patil G, Dalal A, Maydeo A. Feasibility and outcomes of anti-reflux mucosectomy for proton pump inhibitor dependent gastroesophageal reflux disease: first Indian study (with video). Digestive Endoscopy. Blackwell Publishing; 2019;

  8. Yoo IK, Ko WJ, Kim HS, Kim HK, Kim JH, Kim WH, et al. Anti-reflux mucosectomy using a cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection method for refractory gastroesophageal disease: a prospective feasibility study. Surgical endoscopy [Internet]. Springer; 2020 [cited 2020 mar 18];34:1124–31. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139995

  9. Hedberg HM, Kuchta K, Ujiki MB. First experience with banded anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) for GERD: feasibility, safety, and technique (with Video). Journal of gastrointestinal surgery: official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract [Internet]. Springer New York LLC; 2019 [cited 2020 mar 18];23:1274–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30734179

  10. Davis CS, Baldea A, Johns JR, Joehl RJ, Fisichella PM. The evolution and long-term results of laparoscopic antireflux surgery for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons; 2010. p. 332–41

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antoine Debourdeau.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Authors MB and JMG had received research grants from the company Boston Scientifics in other areas of research. Authors AD, VV, and LM declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Debourdeau, A., Vitton, V., Monino, L. et al. Antireflux Mucosectomy Band (ARM-b) in Treatment of Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After Bariatric Surgery. OBES SURG 30, 4654–4658 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04753-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04753-4

Keywords

Navigation