Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Employment Outcomes 2 Years After Bariatric Surgery: Relationship to Quality of Life and Psychosocial Predictors

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Bariatric surgery is the most effective long-term treatment for severe obesity. In addition to sustained weight loss, bariatric surgery can result in improvements in mental and physical health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and, consequently, work capacity. The purpose of our study was to evaluate changes to employment impairment (EI) and related HRQOL in patients 2 years post-bariatric surgery.

Methods

Prospective data was collected on a cohort of 211 patients who underwent bariatric surgery. The Lam Employment Absence and Productivity Scale (LEAPS) and the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) were used to assess pre- and post-operative EI and physical and mental HRQOL, respectively. Predictors of work impairment changes were analyzed via multiple regression analysis and included demographic variables, history of psychiatric illness, and depression and anxiety self-report measures.

Results

Significant improvements in employment outcomes 2 years following surgery were noted with 68% of participants reporting an overall decrease in EI (total LEAPS score change = − 2.43 ± 5.76, p < 0.001), and 44% participants reporting an increase in work productivity (LEAPS productivity score change = − 0.67 ± 2.38, p < 0.001). Bariatric surgery was also associated with significant improvements in physical (change = 17.41 ± 10.72, p < 0.001) and mental (change = 2.67 ± 12.89, p = 0.001). Improvements in HRQOL predicted improvements in work-related impairment and productivity, while history of psychiatric illness predicted was associated with reduced improvement in work productivity.

Conclusions

Our results provide further evidence of improvement in work productivity and reduction in EI post-bariatric surgery. This study also provides insights into potential predictors of work-related impairment and productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO - Obesity and overweight. (2017). World Health Organization. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight. Accessed 29 Apr 2019.

  2. Dobbs R, Sawers C, Thompson F, Manyika J, Woetzel J, Child P, et al. Overcoming obesity: an initial economic analysis. McKinsey Global Institute; 2014. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/Economic%20Studies%20TEMP/Our%20Insights/How%20the%20world%20could%20better%20fight%20obesity/MGI_Overc. Accessed 23 Nov 2018.

  3. Wolf AM. Economic outcomes of the obese patient. Obes Res. 2002;10 Suppl(1):58–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lehnert T, Sonntag D, Konnopka A, et al. Economic costs of overweight and obesity. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;27(2):105–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. von Lengerke T, Krauth C. Economic costs of adult obesity: a review of recent European studies with a focus on subgroup-specific costs. Maturitas. 2011;69(3):220–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Neovius K, Johansson K, Kark M, et al. Obesity status and sick leave: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2009;10(1):17–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Neovius K, Johansson K, Rossner S, et al. Disability pension, employment and obesity status: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2008;9(6):572–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ewing BT, Thompson MA, Wachtel MS, et al. A cost-benefit analysis of bariatric surgery on the South Plains region of Texas. Obes Surg. 2011;21(5):644–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Finkelstein EA, Allaire BT, DiBonaventura MD, et al. Direct and indirect costs and potential cost savings of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding among obese patients with diabetes. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(9):1025–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Finkelstein E, Fiebelkorn l C, Wang G. The costs of obesity among full-time employees. Am J Health Promot. 2005;20(1):45–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kleinman N, Abouzaid S, Andersen L, et al. Cohort analysis assessing medical and nonmedical cost associated with obesity in the workplace. J Occup Environ Med. 2014;56(2):161–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dee A, Kearns K, O’Neill C, et al. The direct and indirect costs of both overweight and obesity: a systematic review. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:242.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Karlsson J, Taft C, Ryden A, et al. Ten-year trends in health-related quality of life after surgical and conventional treatment for severe obesity: the SOS intervention study. Int J Obes (London). 2007;31(8):1248–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Golzarand M, Toolabi K, Farid R. The bariatric surgery and weight losing: a meta-analysis in the long- and very long-term effects of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on weight loss in adults. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(11):4331–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hawkins SC, Osborne A, Finlay IG, et al. Paid work increases and state benefit claims decrease after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2007;17(4):434–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sampalis JS, Liberman M, Auger S, et al. The impact of weight reduction surgery on health-care costs in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2004;14(7):939–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. van Gemert WG, Adang EM, Kop M, et al. A prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of vertical banded gastroplasty for the treatment of morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 1999;9(5):484–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hawke A, O’Brien P, Watts JM, et al. Psychosocial and physical activity changes after gastric restrictive procedures for morbid obesity. Aust N Z J Surg. 1990;60(10):755–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vayr F, Charras L, Savall F, et al. The impact of bariatric surgery on employment: a systematic review. Bariatr Surg Pract and Patient Care. 2018;13(2):54–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tarride JE, Breau R, Sharma AM, et al. The effect of bariatric surgery on mobility, health-related quality of life, healthcare resource utilization, and employment status. Obes Surg. 2017;27(2):349–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mancini A, Borel AL, Coumes S, et al. Bariatric surgery improves the employment rate in people with obesity: 2-year analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(11):1700–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mitchell JE, Selzer F, Kalarchian MA, et al. Psychopathology before surgery in the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery-3 (LABS-3) Psychosocial Study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(5):533–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Dawes AJ, Maggard-Gibbons M, Maher AR, et al. Mental health conditions among patients seeking and undergoing bariatric surgery: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;315(2):150–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Finch RA, Phillips K. An employer’s guide to behavioral health services. Washington, DC: National Business Group on Health/Center for Prevention and Health Services. Available from: http://www.businessgrouphealth.org/publications/index.cfm; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kalarchian MA, King WC, Devlin MJ, et al. Psychiatric disorders and weight change in a prospective study of bariatric surgery patients: a 3-year follow-up. Psychosom Med. 2016;78(3):373–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Alfonso-Cristancho R, King WC, Mitchell JE, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of work status and productivity after bariatric surgery. JAMA. 2016;316(15):1595–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Mitchell JE, Selzer F, Kalarchian MA, et al. Psychopathology before surgery in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery-3 (LABS3) psychosocial study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(5):533–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sockalingam S, Hawa R, Wnuk S, et al. Psychosocial predictors of quality of life and weight loss two years after bariatric surgery: results from the Toronto Bari-PSYCH study. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2017;47:7–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pitzul KB, Jackson T, Crawford S, et al. Understanding disposition after referral for bariatric surgery: when and why patients referred do not undergo surgery. Obes Surg. 2014;24(1):134–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sockalingam S, Cassin S, Hawa R, et al. Predictors of post-bariatric surgery appointment attendance: the role of relationship style. Obes Surg. 2013;23(12):2026–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lam RW, Michalak EE, Yatham LN. A new clinical rating scale for work absence and productivity: validation in patients with major depressive disorder. BMC Psychiatry. 2009;9:78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Sockalingam S, Wnuk S, Kantarovich K, et al. Employment outcomes one year after bariatric surgery: the role of patient and psychosocial factors. Obes Surg. 2015;25(3):514–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ware Jr JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Adams TD, Pendleton RC, Strong MB, et al. Health outcomes of gastric bypass patients compared to nonsurgical, nonintervened severely obese. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010;18(1):121–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992;305(6846):160–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:606–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Cassin S, Sockalingam S, Hawa R, et al. Psychometric properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) as a depression screening tool for bariatric surgery candidates. Psychosomatics. 2013;54(4):352–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nasirzadeh Y, Kantarovich K, Wnuk S, et al. Binge eating, loss of control over eating, emotional eating, and night eating after bariatric surgery: results from the Toronto Bari-PSYCH Cohort Study. Obes Surg. 2018;28(7):2032–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, et al. Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(5):317–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ho K, Hawa R, Wnuk S, et al. The psychosocial effects of perioperative complications after bariatric surgery. Psychosomatics. 2018;59(5):452–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl(20):22–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lam RW, Parikh SV, Ramasubbu R, et al. Effects of combined pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy for improving work functioning in major depressive disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;203(5):358–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Thiara G, Yanofksy R, Abdul-Kader S, et al. Toronto Bariatric Interprofessional Psychosocial Assessment Suitability Scale: evaluating a new clinical assessment tool for bariatric surgery candidates. Psychosomatics. 2016;57(2):165–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Faria GR, Preto JR, Costa-Maia J. Gastric bypass is a cost-saving procedure: results from a comprehensive Markov model. Obes Surg. 2013;23(4):460–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Jurgensen JA, Reidt W, Kellogg T, Mundi M, Shah M, Clavell MLC. Impact of patient attrition from bariatric surgery practice on clinical outcomes. Obes Surg. 2019;29(2):579–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Puhl RM, King KM. Weight discrimination and bullying. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;27(2):117–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our patients who participated in the study. We would also like to thank our Toronto Western Hospital Bariatric Surgery Program team members for their support.

Special Characters and Statistical Abbreviations

SDstandard deviation

CIconfidence interval

βstandardized beta (coefficient beta standardized to unit of standard deviation)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjeev Sockalingam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kantarovich, K., Wnuk, S., Cassin, S. et al. Employment Outcomes 2 Years After Bariatric Surgery: Relationship to Quality of Life and Psychosocial Predictors. OBES SURG 29, 2854–2861 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03905-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03905-5

Keywords

Navigation