Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Impact of Hospital and Surgeon Volume on Clinical Outcome Following Bariatric Surgery

  • Review
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dramatic rise in the prevalence of obesity worldwide has led to the rapid growth of bariatric surgery. The aim of this pooled analysis is to evaluate the relationship between institutional and surgeon volume and outcomes following bariatric surgery. Medical, Embase, trial registries, conference proceedings and reference lists were searched for trials comparing clinical outcome following bariatric surgery at high and low volume hospitals and by high and low volume surgeons. Outcomes analysed were mortality, morbidity and length of hospital stay. Fifteen publications were included in this analysis. In total, 289,732 bariatric procedures were included in the institutional volume analysis, and 32,920 bariatric operations were included in the surgeon volume analysis. Mortality was reduced following surgery at high volume institutions (0.24 vs. 2.18 %; pooled odds ratio = 0.26; P = 0.004) and by high volume surgeons (0.41 vs. 2.77 %; pooled odds ratio = 0.21; P < 0.001). Similarly, morbidity was reduced in high volume institutions (7.84 vs. 8.85 %; pooled odds ratio = 0.52; P < 0.001) and with high volume surgeons (6.92 vs. 7.29 %; pooled odds ratio = 0.47; P < 0.001). There were insufficient data for conclusive statistical analysis of length of hospital stay. This pooled analysis does suggest a benefit in the centralisation of bariatric surgery to high volume institutions and surgeons with respect to mortality and morbidity. Future high-powered studies with adjustment for procedural and patient case mix are required to further define the volume–outcome relationship in bariatric surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Steinbrook R. Surgery for severe obesity. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1075–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pories WJ, Swanson MS, MacDonald KG, et al. Who would have though it? An operation proves to be the most effective therapy for adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 1995;222:339–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schauer P, Ikramuddin S, Hamad G, et al. The learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is 100 cases. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:405–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, et al. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. JAMA. 1999;282:1523–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ga G, van Gijn W, Wouters MW, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume–outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98:485–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Gijn W, Gooiker GA, Wouters MW, et al. Volume and outcome in colorectal cancer surgery. Eur J Surg. 2010;36:S55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cowan JA, Dimick JB, Thompson BG, et al. Surgeon volume as an indicator of outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: an effect independent of specialty practice and hospital volume. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195:814–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine, Levels of Evidence (2009). Oxford, UK

  9. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Sta Med. 2002;21:1539–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alami RS, Morton JM, Sanchez BR, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a Veterans Affairs and high-volume academic facilities: a comparison of institutional outcomes. Am J Surg. 2005;190:821–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Birkmeyer NJ, Dimick JB, Share D, et al. Hospital complication rates with bariatric surgery in Michigan. JAMA. 2010;304:435–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Carbonell AM, Lincourt AE, Matthews BD, et al. National study of the effect of patient and hospital characteristics on bariatric surgery outcomes. Am Surg. 2005;71:308–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chevallier JM, Paita M, Rodde-Dunet MH, et al. Predictive factors of outcome after gastric banding: a nationwide survey on the role of center activity and patients’ behavior. Ann Surg. 2007;246:1034–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Courcoulas A, Schuchert M, Gatti G, et al. The relationship of surgeon and hospital volume to outcome after gastric bypass surgery in Pennsylvania: a 3-year summary. Surgery. 2003;134:613–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dimick JB, Osborne NH, Nicholas L, et al. Identifying high-quality bariatric surgery centeres: hospital volume or risk adjusted outcomes? J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:702–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hernandez-Boussard T, Downey JR, McDonald K et al. Relationship between patient safety and hospital surgical volume. Health Service Research 30 Aug 2011 online

  18. Liu JH, Zingmond D, Etzioni DA, et al. Characterizing the performance and outcomes of obesity surgery in California. Am Surg. 2003;69:823–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Livingston EH. Bariatric surgery outcomes at designated centers of excellence vs. nondesignated programs. Arch Surg. 2009;144:319–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Morino M, Toppino M, Forestieri P, et al. Mortality after bariatric surgery: analysis of 13,871 morbidly obese patients from a national registry. Ann Surg. 2007;246:1002–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Murr MM, Martin T, Haines K, et al. A state-wide review of contemporary outcomes of gastric bypass in Florida: does provider volume impact outcomes? Ann Surg. 2007;245:699–706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nguyen NT, Paya M, Stevens CM, et al. The relationship between hospital volume and outcome in bariatric surgery at academic medical centers. Ann Surg. 2004;240:586–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Weller W, Hannah EL. Relationship between provider volume and postoperative complications for bariatric procedures in New York State. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:753–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Flum DR, Salem L, Elrod JA, et al. Early mortality among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005;294:1903–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith MD, Patterson E, Wahed AS, et al. Relationship between surgeon volume and adverse outcomes after RYGB in Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:118–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, et al. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA. 2006;295:1549–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, et al. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents and adults. 1999–2002. JAMA. 2004;291:2847–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Richards NG, Beekley AC, Tichansky DS. The economic costs of obesity and the impact of bariatric surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2011;91:1173–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Foley EF, Benotti PN, Borlase BC, et al. Impact of gastric restrictive surgery on hypertension in the morbidly obese. Am J Surg. 1992;163:294–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gleysteen JJ, Barboriak JJ, Sasse EA. Sustained coronary-risk-factor reduction after gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990;51:774–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Burchberg B, Masoomi H, Lusby K, et al. Incidence and risk factors of venous thromboembolism in colorectal surgery: does laparoscopy impart an advantage? Arch Surg. 2011;146:739–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Markar SR, Venkat-Ramen V, Ho A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in obese patients. Int J Surg. 2011;9:451–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yamada H, Kojima K, Inokuchi M, et al. Effect of obesity on technical feasibility an postoperative outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy—comparison with open distal gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:997–1004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. DeMaria EJ, Pate V, Warthen M, et al. Baseline data from American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery-designated Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence using the Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:347–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, et al. Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2007;245:777–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, et al. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280:1747–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Gillison EW, Powell J, McConkey CC, et al. Surgical workload and outcome after resection for carcinoma of the oesophagus and cardia. Br J Surg. 2002;89:344–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Weight Loss, Metabolic and Endocrine Surgery, University College London Hospital, London, UK

    Sheraz R. Markar, Marta Penna & Majid Hashemi

  2. Department of Outcomes Research, St George’s Hospital, London, UK

    Alan Karthikesalingam

Authors
  1. Sheraz R. Markar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marta Penna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alan Karthikesalingam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Majid Hashemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Majid Hashemi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Markar, S.R., Penna, M., Karthikesalingam, A. et al. The Impact of Hospital and Surgeon Volume on Clinical Outcome Following Bariatric Surgery. OBES SURG 22, 1126–1134 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0639-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0639-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation