Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Response surface methodology and hydrophobic deep eutectic solvent based liquid phase microextraction combination for determination of cadmium in food and water samples

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, an ecologically friendly, cheap, and highly efficient hydrophobic deep eutectic solvent based liquid phase microextraction procedure was developed and coupled with flame atomic absorption spectrometry for determination of cadmium. Hydrophobic deep eutectic solvent (HDES) was prepared by mixture of trihexyltetradecylphosphonium chloride and pivalic acid and used as extraction solvent. The formation of cadmium complex was achieved by sodium diethyldithiocarbamate trihydrate. Response Surface Methodology by Box–Behnken Design and three different models was used for optimizing experimental conditions and statistical analysis. Analytical parameters such as limit of detection, limit of quantification, relative standard deviation and enhancement factor were calculated as 1.6 µg L−1, 5.0 µg L−1, 3.3% and 43, respectively. Finally, the developed liquid phase microextraction method was applied to some food and water samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F.S. de Dias, M.E.P.A. Guarino, A.L. Costa Pereira, P.P. Pedra, M.A. de Bezerra, S.G. Marchetti, Microchem. J. 146, 1095 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Fırat, S. Bakırdere, M.S. Fındıkoğlu, E.B. Kafa, E. Yazıcı, M. Yolcu, Ç. Büyükpınar, D.S. Chormey, S. Sel, F. Turak, Spectrochim. Acta Part B 129, 37 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Yilmaz, M. Soylak, Anal. Chim. Acta 886, 75 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. T.A. Tran, L.P. Popova, Turk. J. Bot. 37, 1–13 (2013)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. D.J. Leao, M.M.S. Junior, G.C. Brandao, S.L.C. Ferreira, Talanta 153, 45 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Behbahani, Y. Bide, S. Bagheri, M. Salarian, F. Omidi, M.R. Nabid, Microchim. Acta 183, 111 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Khazaeli, H. Haddadi, B. Zargar, A. Hatamie, A. Semnani, Microchem. J. 133, 311 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Krawczyk, M. Jeszka-Skowron, Microchem. J. 126, 296 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. A.P. Santos, M.J. Santos, M. Graças Andrade Korn, V.A. Lemos, J. Sci. Food Agric. 99, 4609 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. H.E. Bayrak, V.N. Bulut, M. Tüfekçi, H. Bayrak, C. Duran, M. Soylak, Turk. J. Chem. 40, 93 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Behbahani, P. Ghareh Hassanlou, M.M. Amini, F. Omidi, A. Esrafili, M. Farzadkia, A. Bagheri, Food Chem. 187, 82 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Moinfar, G. Khayatian, Microchem. J. 132, 293 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. I. Gaubeur, M.A. Aguirre, N. Kovachev, M. Hidalgo, A. Canals, Microchem. J. 121, 219 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Xu, W. Fan, H. Lv, Y. Liang, Y. Shan, G. Li, Z. Yang, L. Yu, Spectrochim Acta Part A 123, 430 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Li, Z. Yang, J. Cao, B. Qiu, H. Li, Chromatographia 81, 881 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. B.P. Jackson, T. Punshon, Curr. Environ. Heal. Rep. 2, 15 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Mei, J. Pang, X. Huang, Q. Luo, Anal. Chim. Acta 1090, 82 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. I. Machado, F. Tissot, Talanta 212, 120783 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. J.A. Barreto, R. dos Santos de Assis, R.J. Cassella, V.A. Lemos, Talanta 193, 23 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. I. Rykowska, J. Ziemblińska, I. Nowak, J. Mol. Liq. 259, 319 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. E. Psillakis, TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 113, 332 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Q. Wang, R. Chen, W. Shatner, Y. Cao, Y. Bai, Ultrason. Sonochem. 51, 369 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. B. Hashemi, P. Zohrabi, K.-H. Kim, M. Shamsipur, A. Deep, J. Hong, TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 97, 83 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Liu, P.K. Dasgupta, Anal. Chem. 68, 1817 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. M.A. Jeannot, F.F. Cantwell, Anal. Chem. 68, 2236 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. M.H. Habibollahi, K. Karimyan, H. Arfaeinia, N. Mirzaei, Y. Safari, R. Akramipour, H. Sharafi, N. Fattahi, J. Sci. Food Agric. 99, 656 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. T.S. Neri, D.P. Rocha, R.A.A. Muñoz, N.M.M. Coelho, A.D. Batista, Microchem. J. 147, 894 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. D. Çitak, R. Demirok, Cumhur. Sci. J. 40, 917 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. M.P. Callao, TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 62, 86 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. A. Niazi, S. Habibi, M. Ramezani, Arab. J. Chem. 8, 706 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. T. Belwal, P. Dhyani, I.D. Bhatt, R.S. Rawal, V. Pande, Food Chem. 207, 115 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. F. Heydari, M. Ramezani, J. Anal. Chem. 74, 1081 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. F. Heydari, M. Ramezani, Sep. Sci. Technol. 52, 1643 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. E. Koosha, M. Ramezani, A. Niazi, J. Anal. Chem. 74, 1073 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. S.L.C. Ferreira, R.E. Bruns, H.S. Ferreira, G.D. Matos, J.M. David, G.C. Brandão, E.G.P. da Silva, L.A. Portugal, P.S. dos Reis, A.S. Souza, W.N.L. dos Santos, Anal. Chim. Acta 597, 179 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. G.E.P. Box, D.R. Cox, J.R. Stat, Soc. Ser. B 26, 211 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study did not receive any specific Grant from funding agencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Science and Arts, Department of Chemistry, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, 60250, Tokat, Turkey

    Demirhan Çıtak

  2. Faculty of Science and Arts, Department of Mathematics, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, 60250, Tokat, Turkey

    Dilek Sabancı

Authors
  1. Demirhan Çıtak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dilek Sabancı
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Demirhan Çıtak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent not applicable to this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Çıtak, D., Sabancı, D. Response surface methodology and hydrophobic deep eutectic solvent based liquid phase microextraction combination for determination of cadmium in food and water samples. Food Measure 15, 1843–1850 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00761-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00761-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation