Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of three drying methods on the phenolic profile and biological activities of Salvia absconditiflora

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drying method is one of the most important steps in the preparation of plant materials for phytochemical analysis and biological evaluation. In this sense, this research endeavoured to evaluate the effects three drying methods (oven, freeze, and shade drying) on phytochemical component, antioxidant, and enzyme inhibitory effects of Salvia absconditiflora Greuter & Burdet. Antioxidant activities were screened by phosphomolybdenum, DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, CUPRAC, and metal chelating activity. Enzyme inhibitory effects were assessed against cholinesterases (AChE, BChE), tyrosinase, α-amylase, and α-glucosidase. Drying methods were found to affect the chemical component and biological properties. Shade drying showed the highest TPC (99.33 mgGAE/g) and TFC (46.88 mgRE/g) followed by oven (58.15 mgGAE/g for TPC, 40.65 for TFC), and freeze drying (43.73 mgGAE/g for TPC, 36.68 mgRE/g for TFC). The main phenolic compound characterized by HPLC was rosmarinic acid, which was observed to be highest following shade drying. Shade drying contained highest total bioactive compounds and exhibited the strongest antioxidant properties. The enzyme inhibitory effects of S. absconditiflora performed using different depends were dependent on the drying methods. Our results tend to suggest that shade drying was most suitable for S. absconditiflora because of possessing the highest rosmarinic acid and biological properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Tan, S. Yazici-Tutunis, Y. Yesil, B. Demirci, E. Tan, Rec. Nat. Prod. 11, 456–461 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J.B. Walker, K.J. Sytsma, J. Treutlein, M. Wink, Am. J. Bot. 91(7), 1115–1125 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Kamatou, N. Makunga, W. Ramogola, A. Viljoen, J. Ethnopharmacol. 119(3), 664–672 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Kamatou, R. Van Zyl, S. Van Vuuren, A. Figueiredo, J. Barroso, L. Pedro, A. Viljoen, S. Afr. J. Bot. 74(2), 230–237 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M.R. Loizzo, M. Abouali, P. Salehi, A. Sonboli, M. Kanani, F. Menichini, R. Tundis, Nat. Prod. Res. 28(24), 2278–2285 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Mohammadhosseini, J Essent. Oil Bear. PL. 18(2), 464–476 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Xu, R. Wan, Y. Lin, L. Yang, Y. Chen, C. Liu, Asian J. Pharmacodyn. Pharmacokinet. 7(2), 99–130 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y.-B. Wu, Z.-Y. Ni, Q.-W. Shi, M. Dong, H. Kiyota, Y.-C. Gu, B. Cong, Chem. Rev. 112(11), 5967–6026 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. I. Cvetkovikj, G. Stefkov, J. Acevska, J.P. Stanoeva, M. Karapandzova, M. Stefova, A. Dimitrovska, S. Kulevanova, J. Chromatogr. A 1282, 38–45 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. M.B. Bahadori, H. Valizadeh, B. Asghari, L. Dinparast, M.M. Farimani, S. Bahadori, J. Funct. Food 18, 727–736 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. P. Salehi, A. Sonboli, M. Dayeni, F. Eftekhar, M. Yousefzadi, Chem. Nat. Compd. 44(1), 102–105 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Baytop, Türkiyede bitkiler ile tedavi (geçmişte ve bugün), 2nd edn. (İstanbul Üniversitesi, Istanbul, 1984), pp. 142–143

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. Baytop, Türkçe bitki adları sözlüğü, 2nd edn. (Turk Dil Kurumu, Ankara, 1994), pp. 20–21

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. Honda, E. Yeşilada, M. Tabata, E. Sezik, T. Fujita, Y. Takeda, Y. Takaishi, T. Tanaka, J. Ethnopharmacol. 53(2), 75–87 (1996)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Yuan, L.-J. Hao, G. Wu, S. Wang, J. Duan, G.-Y. Xie, M.-J. Qin, J. Funct. Foods. 19 786–795 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. L. Zhang, T. Liu, Y. Xue, C. Liu, H. Ru, M. Dong, Z. Yu, J. Food Process Eng. 39(2), 107–120 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. P. Juyan, G. Yuehua, W. Junru, L. Yan, L. Zongsuo, Acta Bot. Boreal.-Occident. Sin. 26(10), 2044–2050 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Soysal, S. Öztekin, J. Agric. Eng. Res. 78(2), 159–166 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Huang, M. Zhang, Dry. Technol. 34(8), 900–911 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Zhu, B.-Q. Pu, G.-Y. Xie, M. Tian, F.-Y. Xu, M.-J. Qin, Molecules 19(7), 10440–10454 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Y. Chen, A. Martynenko, LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 87 470–477 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. S.M. Jafari, D. Azizi, H. Mirzaei, D. Dehnad, J. Food Process. Preserv. 40(3), 362–372 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. X. Jin, T. Oliviero, R. van der Sman, R. Verkerk, M. Dekker, A. van Boxtel, LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 59(1), 189–195 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. M.C. Karam, J. Petit, D. Zimmer, E.B. Djantou, J. Scher, J. Food Eng. 188, 32–49 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. X.-F. Shi, J.-Z. Chu, Y.-F. Zhang, C.-Q. Liu, X.-Q. Yao, Ind. Crops Prod. 104, 45–51 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. N. Jiang, C. Liu, D. Li, Z. Zhang, C. Liu, D. Wang, L. Niu, M. Zhang, LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 82 216–226 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. S. Uysal, G. Zengin, A. Aktumsek, S. Karatas, J. Funct. Foods. 22, 518–532 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. S. Uysal, A. Ugurlu, G. Zengin, M.C. Baloglu, Y.C. Altunoglu, A. Mollica, L. Custodio, N.R. Neng, J.M. Nogueira, M.F. Mahomoodally, Food Chem. Toxicol. 111, 525–536 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. G. Zengin, E.J. Llorent-Martínez, M.L. Fernández-de Córdova, M.B. Bahadori, A. Mocan, M. Locatelli, A. Aktumsek, Ind. Crops Prod. 111, 11–21 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. M.J. Rahman, A.C. de Camargo, F. Shahidi, J. Funct. Foods. 35, 622–634 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. M.B. Farhat, R. Chaouch-Hamada, J.A. Sotomayor, A. Landoulsi, M.J. Jordán, Ind. Crops Prod. 54, 78–85 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. R.-L. Qin, C.-N. Lv, Y. Zhao, Y.-D. Zhao, Y. Yu, J.-C. Lu, Ind. Crops Prod. 107, 288–296 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. J.C. Nunes, M.G. Lago, V.N. Castelo-Branco, F.R. Oliveira, A.G. Torres, D. Perrone, M. Monteiro, Food Chem. 197, 881–890 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. M. Hossain, C. Barry-Ryan, A.B. Martin-Diana, N. Brunton, Food Chem. 123(1), 85–91 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. D.S. Sogi, M. Siddiq, K.D. Dolan, LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 62(1), 564–568 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Y. Zhang, J.P. Smuts, E. Dodbiba, R. Rangarajan, J.C. Lang, D.W. Armstrong, J. Agric. Food Chem. 60(36), 9305–9314 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. R. Bruni, G. Sacchetti, Molecules 14(2), 682–725 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. H. Tanko, D.J. Carrier, L. Duan, E. Clausen, Plant Genet. Resour. 3(2), 304–313 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. J. Samoticha, A. Wojdyło, K. Lech, LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 66, 484–489 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. I. Quispe-Fuentes, A. Vega-Gálvez, M. Aranda, J. Sci. Food Agric. 98(11), 4168–4176 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. A. Horszwald, H. Julien, W. Andlauer. Food Chem. 141(3), 2858–2863 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. S.T. Ngo, M.S. Li, Mol. Simul. 39(4), 279–291 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. A.Y. Sun, Q. Wang, A. Simonyi, G.Y. Sun, Neuromol. Med 10(4), 259–274 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. F. Hiroyuki, Y. Tomohide, O. Kazunori, J. Nutr. Biochem. 12(6), 351–356 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. M.C.N. Picot, O. Bender, A. Atalay, G. Zengin, L. Loffredo, F. Hadji-Minaglou, M.F. Mahomoodally, Biomed. Pharmacother. 89, 342–350 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. M.C.N. Picot, M.F. Mahomoodally, Pharm. Biol. 55(1), 864–872 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. M.T.H. Khan, Curr. Med. Chem. 19(14), 2262–2272 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. W.V. Graham, A. Bonito-Oliva, T.P. Sakmar, Annu. Rev. Med. 68, 413–430 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. U. Wehmeier, W. Piepersberg, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 63(6), 613–625 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. N. Martins, I.C. Ferreira, in Food Bioactives, ed. by P. Munish (Springer, Cham, 2017), pp. 267–298

  51. P. Pradeep, Y.N. Sreerama, Food Chem. 247, 46–55 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. C. De Monte, B. Bizzarri, M.C. Gidaro, S. Carradori, A. Mollica, G. Luisi, A. Granese, S. Alcaro, G. Costa, N. Basilico, S. Parapini, M.M. Scaltrito, C. Masia, F. Sisto, J. Enzyme. Inhib. Med. Chem. 30(6), 1027–1033 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. A.A. Zielinski, C.W. Haminiuk, C.A. Nunes, E. Schnitzler, S.M. Ruth, D. Granato, Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 13(3), 300–316 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sengul Uysal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uysal, S. A comparative study of three drying methods on the phenolic profile and biological activities of Salvia absconditiflora. Food Measure 13, 162–168 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-018-9929-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-018-9929-7

Keywords

Navigation