Skip to main content
Log in

The Treaty of Waitangi and Research Ethics in Aotearoa

  • Published:
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Researchers, when engaging with Māori communities, are in a process of relationship building and this process can be guided by the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi, partnership, participation and protection. The main concerns for many indigenous peoples in research revolve around respect for their indigenous rights, control over research processes and reciprocity within research relationships to ensure that equitable benefits are realised within indigenous groups. Māori have identified similar issues and these concerns can be aligned with the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi. The relevance of the Treaty of Waitangi to research ethics is discussed and this paper suggests a revised interpretation of the treaty principles to incorporate the range of ethical issues that Māori have expressed as important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuriri-Driscoll, A., M. Hudson, Foote, J., M. Hepi, Rogers-Koroheke, M., H. Taimona, Tipa, G., N. North (Te Riu o Hokianga team), Lea, R., B. Tipene-Matua, Symes, J. (Rakaipaaka Health and Ancestry Study). 2008. Scientific collaborative research with Māori communities: Kaupapa or kūpapa Māori? AlterNative. An International Journal of Indigenous Scholarship, Special Supplement, 3(2): 60–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aksoy, S. and A. Tenik. 2002. The “four principles of bioethics” as found in the 13th century Muslim scholar Malwana’s teachings. BMC Medical Ethics, 3(4): Available at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/3/4. Downloaded on 24 May 2004.

  • Anderson, I., Griew, R., and D. McAullay. 2003. Ethics guidelines, health research and Indigenous Australians. New Zealand Bioethics Journal 20–29.

  • Bishop, R., and T. Glynn. 1999. Culture counts: changing power relations in education. Palmerston North: Dunmore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cram, F. 2001. Rangahau Maori: Tona tika, tona pono — The validity and integrity of Maori researchers. In M. Tolich (Ed.), Research ethics in Aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 35–52). Auckland, New Zealand: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cram, F. 2003. Preliminary discussions with Maori key informants: report to the National Ethics Advisory Committee. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C.W. 2000. A framework for addressing Maori knowledge in research, science and technology. Pacific Health Dialog, 7(1): 62–69.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Durie, M. 1994. Whaiora: Maori health development (2nd ed.). Auckaland, N.Z: Oxford University Press.

  • Durie, A. 1998. Me tipu ake te pono: Maori research, ethicality and development. Te Oru Rangahau: Maori Research and Development Conference Proceedings: 257–263. Palmerston North, School of Māori Studies. Massey University.

  • Durie, E.T.J., Temm, P.B., Wilson, W.M., and S. Kenderdine. 1989. New Zealand Law Society seminar: the Treaty of Waitangi. Wellington N.Z: The Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermine, W., Sinclair, R., and B. Jeffery. 2004. The ethics of research involving Indigenous peoples. Report of the Indigenous Peoples Health Research Centre to the Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics. Saskatoon, Canada: Indigenous Peoples Health Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, T. 1992. From pause prompt praise to tatari tautoko tauawhi: A bicultural process of adaptation. A paper presented to the AARE/NZARE Joint Conference, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. 22–26 November.

  • Glynn, T., and R. Bishop. 1995. Cultural issues in educational research: a New Zealand perspective. He Pukenga Kōrero: A Journal of Māori Studies 1(1): 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Health Research Council of New Zealand. 2002. Guidelines on ethics in health research, available at http://www.hrc.govt.nz/assets/pdfs/. Downloaded 5 May 2008.

  • Health Research Council of New Zealand. 2005. Guidelines on Pacific health research. Auckland, N.Z: Health Research Council of New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Health Research Council of New Zealand. 2008. Guidelines for researchers on health research involving Maori. Available at http://www.hrc.govt.nz/assets/pdfs/guideresmaori.pdf. Downloaded 5 May 2008.

  • Hepi, M., Foote, J., Marino, M., Rogers, M., and H. Taimona. 2007. Koe wai hoki koe?!, or Who are you?!: issues of trust in cross-cultural collaborative research. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online 2: 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, M. 2004. He matatika Maori: Maori and ethical review of health research. Masters diss, Auckland University of Technology.

  • Hudson, M.L., Ahuriri-Driscoll, A.L.M., Lea, M.G., and R.A. Lea. 2007. Whakapapa: a foundation for genetic research? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4(1): 43–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Health. 2006. Operational standard for ethics committees. Wellington, N.Z: Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Research Science and Technology. 2007. New Zealand research agenda discussion document. Wellington, N.Z.: Ministry of Research, Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moewaka Barnes, H. 2006. Transforming science: how our structures limit innovation. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand 29: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Health and Medical Research Council. 2003. Values and ethics: Guidelines for ethical conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research.Available http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/PUBLICATIONS/synopses/e52syn.htm. Downloaded 27 April 2004. 13

  • Powick, K. 2002. Nga take matatika mo te mahi rangahau Maori. Maori research ethics: A literature review of the ethical issues and implications of kaupapa Maori research and research involving Maori for researchers, supervisors and ethics committees. Hamilton: School of Education, University of Waikato.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, B. 2002. Mana whakamarama – equal explanatory power: maori and non– Maori sample size in national health surveys. Wellington, N.Z: Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, R. 2004. Māori framework for ethical review of health and disability research: a scoping report to the National Advisory Committee on Health and Disability Ethics (unpublished). Wellington, N. Z: Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, B., and P. Reid. 2001. Ethnicity matters. Wellington, N.Z: Statistics New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, K. 2004. The three P’s: Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi. Unpublished teaching resource, available from Senior Manager Māori. Dunedin, N. Z.: Otago Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L.T. 2001. Decolonising methodologies: research and Indigenous peoples. Dunedin: University of Otago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L.T., M. Hudson, S.J. Tiakiwai and M. Hemi. 2008. The negotiated space — Te hau mihi ata: Mātauranga Māori, science and biotechnology. Unpublished paper, available from the researchers. Office of the Pro-Vice Chancellor Maori: University of Waikato.

  • Sporle, A. and J. Koea. 2004. Maori responsiveness in health and medical research: clarifying the roles of researcher and institution. New Zealand Medical Journal, 117(1199): Available online http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/117-1199/998/. Accessed 14 Nov 2005.

  • Te Awekotuku, N. 1991. He tikanga whakaaro. Wellington, N.Z.: Manatu Maori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teariki, C., Spoonley, P., and N. Tomoana. 1992. Te whakapakari te mana tangata: the politics and process of research for Māori. Palmerston North: Department of Sociology, Massey University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Te Puni, K. 1994. Health sector ethics: nga tikanga pono wahanga hauora: mechanisms for Maori into ethical review. Wellington N.Z.: Ministry of Maori Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolich, M. 2002. Pākehā paralysis: cultural safety for those researching the general population of Aotearoa. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand 19: 164–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, D.F. 1999. Ancient Chinese medical ethics and the four principles of biomedical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 25(4): 315–321.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh-Tapiata, W. 1998. Research within your own Iwi — What are some of the issues? Te Oru Rangahau: Maori Research and Development Conference Proceedings: 249–256. Palmerston North, School of Māori Studies: Massey University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maui L Hudson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hudson, M.L., Russell, K. The Treaty of Waitangi and Research Ethics in Aotearoa. Bioethical Inquiry 6, 61–68 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-008-9127-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-008-9127-0

Keywords

Navigation