Skip to main content
Log in

Study of the Intergranular Corrosion of Sensitized UNS S31803 Stainless Steel in Transpassive Region

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, intergranular corrosion behavior of UNS S31803 duplex stainless steel was investigated using conventional potentiodynamic polarization, double loop electrochemical potentiokinetic reactivation (DLEPR), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) technique carried out at different potentials in the transpassive region. Different types of heat treatments were used to obtain samples with different degrees of sensitization. The results of the DLEPR tests showed that the solution-annealed sample and that was sensitized for half an hour would be considered as nonsensitized ones. Moreover, the sample that was sensitized for 24 h exhibits the highest value of the degree of sensitization. Polarization test results showed a typical active-passive behavior from which the transpassive potential range was determined and used as the range of the applied DC bias in the EIS experiments. Three different AC responses (including capacitive and inductive responses) were observed depending on the value of applied DC bias in the EIS experiments. In addition, it was observed that the presence of the second inductive loop at high applied DC bias is due to the adsorption of nonsoluble corrosion products on the surface of the samples. Moreover, the fitted values to the charge transfer and polarization resistances (R ct and R P) decreased as the sensitization time increased from 30 min to 24 h. Such observations were in good accordance with the metallographic examination of the corroded surfaces, carried out by optical and scanning electron microscopy techniques, revealing discontinuous grain boundary attack in nonsensitized samples and a continuous network of grain boundary attack in the case of sensitized ones. Moreover, as the applied DC bias increases the ferrite phase attack also occurs in the sensitized samples. In addition, approximately no pitting corrosion was observed on the surface of the corroded samples which is in accordance with their respective cyclic polarization responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A.I. Munoz, J.G.A. Anton, J.L. Guinon, and V.P.R. Herranz, Inhibition Effect of Chromate on the Passivation and Pitting Corrosion of a Duplex Stainless Steel in LiBr Solutions Using Electrochemical Techniques, Corros. Sci., 2007, 49, p 3200–3225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Sieurin, E.M. Westin, M. Liljas, and R. Sandström, Fracture Toughness of Welded Commercial Lean Duplex Stainless Steels, Welding in the World, 2009, 53(3–4), p R24–R33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Ravindranath and S.N. Malhotra, The Influence of Aging on The Intergranular Corrosion of 22 Chromium-5 Nickel Duplex Stainless Steel, Corros. Sci., 1995, 37(1), p 121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. K.L. Weng, H.R. Chen, and J.R. Yang, The Low-Temperature Aging Embrittlement in a 2205 Duplex Stainless Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2004, 379(1–2), p 119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Gong, Y.M. Jiang, B. Deng, J.L. Xu, J.P. Hu, and J. Li, Evaluation of Intergranular Corrosion Susceptibility of UNS S31803 Duplex Stainless Steel with an Optimized Double Loop Electrochemical Potentiokinetic Reactivation Method, Electrochim. Acta, 2010, 55, p 5077–5083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. “Standard Practices for Detecting Susceptibility to Intergranular Attack in Austenitic Stainless Steels,” ASTM A262, ASTM International, 2002

  7. “Standard Test Method for Electrochemical Reactivation (EPR) for Detecting Sensitization of AISI Type 304 and 304L Stainless Steels,” ASTM G108-99, ASTM international, 1999

  8. T. Amadou, C. Braham, and H. Sidhom, Double Loop Electrochemical Potentiokinetic Reactivation Test Optimization in Checking of Duplex Stainless Steel Intergranular Corrosion Susceptibility, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2004, 35A, p 3499–3513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. G.H. Aydogdu and M.K. Aydinol, Determination of Susceptibility to Intergranular Corrosion and Electrochemical Reactivation Behaviour of AISI, 316L Type Stainless Steel, Corros. Sci., 2006, 48, p 3565–3583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Deng, Y. Jiang, J. Xu, T. Sun, J. Gao, L. Zhang, W. Zhang, and J. Li, Application of the Modified Electrochemical Potentiodynamic Reactivation Method to Detect Susceptibility to Intergranular Corrosion of a Newly Developed Lean Duplex Stainless Steel LDX2101, Corros. Sci., 2010, 52, p 969–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M.E. Arıkan, R. Arıkan, and M. Doruk, Determination of Susceptibility to Intergranular Corrosion of UNS 31803 Type Duplex Stainless Steel by Electrochemical Reactivation Method, Int. J. Corros., 2012, Article ID 651829

  12. A. Arutunow and K. Darowicki, DEIS Evaluation of the Relative Effective Surface Area of AISI, 304 Stainless Steel Dissolution Process in Conditions of Intergranular Corrosion, Electrochim. Acta, 2009, 54, p 1034–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Arutunow, K. Darowicki, and A. Zielinński, Atomic Force Microscopy Based Approach to Local Impedance Measurements of Grain Interiors and Grain Boundaries of Sensitized AISI, 304 Stainless Steel, Electrochim. Acta, 2011, 56(5), p 2372–2377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Z.-J. Jia, C.-W. Du, C.-T. Li, Z. Yi, and X.-G. Li, Study on Pitting Process of 316L Stainless Steel by Means of Staircase Potential Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2011, 18(1), p 48–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Hou, G. Zhu, J. Xu, and H. Liu, Anticorrosion Performance of Epoxy Coatings Containing Small Amount of Inherently Conducting PEDOT/PSS on Hull Steel in Seawater, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2013, 29(7), p 678–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S.M. Bhola, S. Kundu, R. Bhola, B. Mishra, and S. Chatterjee, Electrochemical Study of Diffusion Bonded Joints Between Micro-Duplex Stainless Steel and Ti6Al4V Alloy, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2014, 30(2), p 163–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R.K. Gupta, K. Mensah-Darkwa, and D. Kumar, Corrosion Protective Conversion Coatings on Magnesium Disks Using a Hydrothermal Technique, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2014, 30(1), p 47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Chaves, I. Costa, H.G.D. Melo, and S. Wolynec, Evaluation of Selective Corrosion in UNS S31803 Duplex Stainless Steel with Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy, Electrochim. Acta, 2006, 51(8–9), p 1842–1846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. D. Han, Y.M. Jiang, C. Shi, B. Deng, and J. Li, Effect of Temperature, Chloride Ion and pH on the Crevice Corrosion Behavior of SAF 2205 Duplex Stainless Steel in Chloride Solutions, J. Mater. Sci., 2012, 47(2), p 1018–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. V. Guiñón-Pina, A. Igual-Muñoz, and J. García-Antón, Influence of pH on the Electrochemical Behaviour of a Duplex Stainless Steel in Highly Concentrated LiBr Solutions, Corros. Sci., 2011, 53(2), p 575–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. “Standard Test Methods for Detecting Detrimental Intermetallic Phase in Duplex Austenitic/Ferritic Stainless Steels,” ASTM A923-03, ASTM International, 2003

  22. “Standard Practice for Calculation of Corrosion Rates and Related Information from Electrochemical Measurements,” ASTM G102-89, ASTM International, 2010

  23. Z. Ahmad, Principles of Corrosion Engineering and Corrosion Control, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2006, p 77–79

    Google Scholar 

  24. K. Morshed Behbahani and M. Pakshir, Effect of Different Degrees of Sensitization on the EIS Response of 316L and 316 SS in Transpassive Region, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2014, 23(6), p 2283–2292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. K. Morshed Behbahani, M. Pakshir, Z. Abbasi, and P. Najafisayar, Damage Mechanism at Different Transpassive Potentials of Solution-Annealed 316 and 316l Stainless Steels, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 2015, 22(1), p 45–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. C.-A. Huang, Y.-Z. Chang, and S. Chen, The Electrochemical Behavior of Austenitic Stainless Steel with Different Degrees of Sensitization in the Transpassive Potential Region in 1MH2 SO4 Containing Chloride, Corros. Sci., 2004, 46(6), p 1501–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. H. Duan, Y. Li, and C. Yan, Electrochemical Repairing of Pitted 18-8 Stainless Steel, J. Mater. Sci., 2005, 40(11), p 2911–2917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. M. Maleeva, A. Rybkina, A. Marshakov, and V. Elkin, The Effect of Atomic Hydrogen on the Anodic Dissolution of Iron in a Sulfate Electrolyte Studied with Impedance Spectroscopy, Prot. Met., 2008, 44(6), p 548–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. W.S. Tait, An Introduction to Electrochemical Corrosion Testing for Practicing Engineers and Scientists, Pair O Docs Publications, Racine, WI, 1994, p 64–67

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pooria Najafisayar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morshed Behbahani, K., Najafisayar, P. & Pakshir, M. Study of the Intergranular Corrosion of Sensitized UNS S31803 Stainless Steel in Transpassive Region. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 25, 3418–3429 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-016-2176-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-016-2176-3

Keywords

Navigation