Introduction

In the engineering industry, there has been a noticeable, growing demand for castings with special properties such as abrasive wear resistance or corrosion resistance at room or elevated temperature. The components of this type are often produced entirely from expensive materials based on Ni, Co, Ti, or other elements—despite the fact that in many cases the requirements for highly usable properties affect only the working surface layer of the casting, especially if the wear of an element leads to its destruction by exceeding the desired main dimension decrease.

Therefore, the technology of bimetallic castings is gaining in importance, particularly when the criterion for highly usable properties concerns only the working surface layer and the rest of the casting is only the base part which is not exposed to the direct influence of factors causing abrasive or corrosion wear. This technology constitutes the most economical way of enriching the surface of the castings as it allows for production of layered elements directly in the cast process. Therefore, this technology can be significant competition for commonly used technologies of surfacing by welding and thermal spraying, because in addition to its economic advantages it does not allow cracks to develop in the heat affected zone, which arises as a result of making the layer by using the welding method.

In general, the technology of bimetallic castings containing a working layer and a base part is carried out based on two fundamental methods, i.e., the liquid-liquid (Ref 13) and liquid-solid (Ref 417) configuration. An example of the former is a technology in which two independent gating systems are made that guarantee two-stage filling of the sand mold cavity. According to this manufacturing method, the bimetallic elements of the hammer (Ref 1) or ball (Ref 2) mills are cast in material configurations of the chromium cast iron working layer with a low-carbon cast steel base. Whereas the basis technology of bimetallic castings in the liquid-solid configuration is the so-called method of mold cavity preparation. In this manufacturing method, the element that enriches the surface of the casting is placed in the mold in the form of a granular (Ref 47) or monolithic (Ref 715) insert directly before the molten metal is poured. With the use of granular inserts the bimetallic castings were made in a material configuration working surface layer from Fe-Cr-C (Ref 5, 6) and Fe-Cr-C-Mo (Ref 4) or Ni-Cr-Fe-C (Ref 7) alloys with an unalloyed cast steel base. This type of bimetallic casting is characterized by a hard working surface layer that is resistant to abrasive wear, which is a decisive factor about its applicability in the mining industry. An example of technology using the monolithic insert are bimetallic castings in a configuration which comprises hard and resistant to abrasive wear chromium cast iron connected with a weldable low-carbon steel plate (Ref 8, 11). However, a significant economic limitation of this manufacturing method is the need to preheat the steel plate (monolithic insert) placed in the mold. This treatment is carried out by two-stage mold pouring with liquid cast iron. In the first stage, the mold cavity beneath the steel plate is filled with liquid metal in order to preheat the insert. Formed in this way the layer of cast iron after cleaning is separated from the casting. In the second stage, the mold cavity over the steel plate is filled, in which the liquid metal forms a layer connecting with the plate and creating a bimetallic casting. Moreover, in the literature there are data about bimetallic castings made on the basis of monolithic inserts from gray cast iron dipped into a liquid hypoeutectic Al-Si alloy (Ref 16) or low-carbon steel dipping into liquid white cast iron (Ref 17).

However, the technologies of bimetallic castings presented in the available literature have large limitations, e.g., a decrease in the economic process because of the necessity of pouring two different alloys (Ref 13) and a decrease in the yield as a result of the necessity of applying insert preheating (Ref 8, 1015) and complicating the cast process by applying two gating systems (Ref 13, 8, 11). Therefore, the utilitarian aim of the paper is to describe a technology of bimetallic castings in a material configuration of austenitic steel—unalloyed cast steel based on the liquid-solid method using a non-preheated monolithic insert. In the presented technology, preheating of the monolithic insert which makes it easier to form a permanent joint between the working layer and the base part and also increases the production cost as well as makes it difficult to place the steel plate in the mold cavity was replaced by application of an activator covering the contact surface between both of the materials used.

Experimental Procedure

Bimetallic castings which consisted of two fundamental parts, i.e., a base and working surface layer, were made for the study. The base part of the bimetallic casting was a typical foundry material, i.e., unalloyed cast steel, whereas the working layer was a plate of austenitic alloy steel sort X2CrNi 18-9.

Test bimetallic castings 125 × 105 × 45 mm in dimension were made in sand molds with no preheating plates of alloy steel X2CrNi 18-9 were placed which were then poured over with liquid unalloyed cast steel with a carbon concentration in a range of from about 0.20 to about 0.60 wt.% in a pouring temperature of 1550, 1600, and 1650 °C. The preparation methods of greensand with bentonite molds are presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

View of the bottom part (left) and upper part (right) of a sand mold with a monolithic insert (1) placed in its cavity

The pouring temperature was measured by using a thermocouple Pt-PtRh10 directly before the mold was poured and the carbon concentration of the cast steel base part was measured by using a LECO CS-125 analyzer. The rest of the chemical composition elements were measured with a LECO GDS500A emission spectrometer. The basic experimental plan included 16 test castings. On the basis of the results of previous studies (Ref 18), steel plates with a thickness of 5 mm were used whose surfaces stayed in direct contact with the liquid metal and were covered by an activator in the form of boron and sodium compounds, i.e., an aqueous solution of Na2B4O7 + B2O3. These compounds promote the formation of a permanent joint between both materials of layered casting by purification of the contact surface of the oxide layer, protection against the formation of a new oxide layer and also by a decrease in the wetting angle on the insert—the liquid metal boundary. The ratio of thickness obtained in this way between the base and the working part is about 8:1 at a solidification module of casting that was 11.45 mm.

The quality of the joint in the bimetallic castings was evaluated on the basis of ultrasonic non-destructive testing performed by using a DIO 562 flaw detector by STARMANS ELEKTRONICS. Then metallographic macro- and microscopic examinations were carried out. Metallographic samples were etched in reagent Mi19Fe containing 3 g of ferric chloride, 10 cm3 hydrochloric acid and 90 cm3 ethanol, and electrolytic polishing and etching were done in reagent A2 according to (Ref 19) with the use of LectroPol-5 STRUERS. A light microscope (LOM) NIKON and scanning electron microscope (SEM) INSPECT F were used in research on the structure with microanalysis of the chemical composition (EDS). Moreover, measurements of microhardness were done using Future-Tech FM 700 (HV0,01).

Therefore, the scientific aim of the paper was to assess the quality of the joint between the base part and the working layer depending on the pouring temperature and carbon concentration in the cast steel.

Results and Discussion

The chemical composition of material used on the working layer (steel X2CrNi 18-9) and the base part (unalloyed cast steel) of the bimetallic castings is presented in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1 Chemical composition of the alloy steel X2CrNi 18-9 working layer of a bimetallic casting
Table 2 Chemical composition of the unalloyed cast steel base part of a bimetallic casting with deviations containing all melts

Non-destructive ultrasonic testing showed that in none of the 16 test castings in the basic experimental plan did a permanent joint occur on the whole contact surface between the working layer and the base part. The largest surface of the permanent joint for which the bottom echo was larger than the echo of the transition zone (head placed on the side of the plate) was obtained at a pouring temperature of 1650 °C and a concentration of carbon in cast steel that was equal to 0.60 wt.%. This surface was equal to 80% of the whole contact surface of both materials. In other cases a permanent joint was obtained between the alloy steel and unalloyed cast steel on a surface that was less than 80% (Fig. 2). Moreover, it was confirmed that applying a pouring temperature of 1550 °C, irrespective of the carbon concentration in cast steel, does not allow to obtain any kind of joint between the working layer and the base part in the bimetallic casting.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Influence of the pouring temperature (T zal) and the carbon concentration in unalloyed cast steel (C) on surface (P) at which a permanent joint between alloy steel X2CrNi 18-9 plate and unalloyed cast steel in a bimetallic casting at module 11.45 mm was obtained

These results were confirmed by a macroscopic visual quality assessment made on selected sections of the test bimetallic castings (Fig. 3). Moreover, in some cases it was found that in places where on the basis of non-destructive ultrasonic testing the lack of a joint had been confirmed, in reality partial joints were present, which was characterized by the presence of the so-called “bimetallic connecting bridges.” The presence of these so-called “bimetallic connecting bridges” also provided stability of the joint between the working and base part of bimetal in conditions of a small working load. A more detailed description of the so-called “bimetallic connecting bridges” is shown in Ref 20.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Example transverse section of the bimetallic casting: 1—working layer in the form of alloy steel X2CrNi 18-9 plate, 2—base part of unalloyed cast steel at a carbon concentration equal to 0.60 wt.% and a pouring temperature of 1650 °C

However, it was affirmed that with an increase in the pouring temperature and the carbon concentration in the material of the base part of layered casting the surface on which the permanent joint was obtained between both bimetal parts increases. Moreover, according to the data presented above, the materials configuration of a bimetallic casting consisting of chromium-nickel alloy steel and hypoeutectoid unalloyed cast steel, due to an insufficiently large difference in the carbon concentration between the jointed components despite the use of a high pouring temperature, does not guarantee that a technologically useful bimetallic casting will be obtained because it is not possible to obtain a permanent joint between the working layer and the base part on the whole contact surface.

However, in areas in which the joint between the austenitic alloy steel and ferritic-pearlitic unalloyed cast steel was obtained it was confirmed that it is durable and has a diffusion character.

A decisive factor is carbon diffusion in the direction from cast steel to the steel plate. A proximate result of this diffusion is the creation of a pearlitic transition zone (δ) with a hardness of 230 μHV (Fig. 4, 5) and a thickness that is dependent on the carbon concentration in the base part (Fig. 6, 7).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Shape of the microstructure of a bimetallic casting in a configuration of the working layer in the form of an alloy steel X2CrNi 18-9 plate and the base part from unalloyed cast steel: A austenite, F ferrite, M martensite, and P pearlite, SEM, etching A2

Fig. 5
figure 5

Microstructure of the joint area between alloy steel X2CrNi 18-9 (upper part) and unalloyed cast steel (bottom part) in a bimetallic casting: A austenite, F ferrite, M martensite, and P pearlite, LOM, etching Mi19Fe

Fig. 6
figure 6

Microstructure of the joint area between austenitic alloy steel (1) and ferritic-pearlitic unalloyed cast steel (2) at a pouring temperature of 1650°C and: (a) C = 0.60 wt.%, (b) C = 0.43 wt.%, and (c) C = 0.20 wt.%, LOM, etching Mi19Fe

Fig. 7
figure 7

Influence of the carbon concentration in unalloyed cast steel on the thickness of the pearlitic transition zone (δ) in a bimetallic casting at a pouring temperature of 1650 °C

Moreover, the result of the diffusion phenomenon is a decarbonising of the cast steel in the near boundary area and, in consequence, the creation in this zone of a ferritic microstructure with a small amount of pearlite, a considerably smaller amount than in the rest of the base part of the casting (Fig. 4, 8). This phenomenon is also seen in a linear microanalysis of the chemical composition that was carried out in the area of the joint between both materials, i.e. there is a decrease in the carbon concentration directly before the pearlitic transition zone (δ) (Fig. 9).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Microstructure containing an increased amount of ferrite in the decarbonising boundary area of unalloyed cast steel: A austenite, F ferrite, M martensite, and P pearlite, LOM, etching A2

Fig. 9
figure 9

Linear distribution of C, Cr, Fe, and Ni in the joint area between ferritic-pearlitic unalloyed cast steel (on the left) and austenitic alloy steel (on the right)

Additionally, the near boundary area of the plate of alloy steel sort X2CrNi 18-9 is carbonized by the cast steel and, as a result, in this zone a microstructure of martensite with a hardness of about 380 μHV is obtained (Fig. 4, 5, 10).

Fig. 10
figure 10

Microanalysis of the chemical composition: (a) microstructure of the studied area, (b) the result in point A, (c) the result in point B

Besides carbonizing of the near boundary area of austenitic steel, the creation of martensite is promoted by cooling from the high temperature the plate has been heated to, and whose source is the liquid cast steel that was poured into the mold.

For a pouring temperature of 1650 °C of cast steel, the contact temperature T s on the boundary of liquid metal-steel plate is fixed on the basis of formula (Ref 21):

$$T_{\text{s}} = \frac{{\sqrt {\uplambda_{\text{n}} \cdot c_{\text{n}} \cdot \uprho_{\text{n}} } \cdot T_{\text{n}} + \sqrt {\uplambda_{\text{r}} \cdot c_{\text{r}} \cdot \uprho_{\text{r}} } \cdot T_{\text{r}} }}{{\sqrt {\uplambda_{\text{n}} \cdot c_{\text{n}} \cdot \uprho_{\text{n}} } + \sqrt {\uplambda_{\text{r}} \cdot c_{\text{r}} \cdot \uprho_{\text{r}} } }}$$
(1)

where λn, λr coefficient of thermal conductivity, suitable for liquid cast steel (the base part of bimetallic casting) and the steel plate (working layer of bimetallic casting), W/(m K); c n, c r specific heat, suitable for liquid cast steel (base part of bimetallic casting) and the steel plate (working layer of bimetallic casting), J/(kg K); ρn, ρr mass density, suitable for the liquid cast steel (base part of bimetallic casting) and the steel plate (working layer of bimetallic casting), kg/m3; T n temperature of the liquid cast steel (base part of bimetallic casting), °C; T r temperature of the steel plate (working layer of bimetallic casting), °C, is about 1100 °C.

Moreover, it was confirmed that the pouring temperature has an influence on the degree of nonlinearity of boundary between the working layer and the base part, which determines the high strength of the joint between both materials in the bimetallic casting. In particular, it increases the nonlinearity of boundary as a result of an increase in the pouring temperature of cast steel (Fig. 11).

Fig. 11
figure 11

Microstructure of the joint area between austenitic alloy steel (upper part) and ferritic-pearlitic unalloyed cast steel (bottom part) at a carbon concentration equal to 0.55 wt.% and: (a) T zal = 1650 °C, (b) T zal = 1600 °C

Therefore, it was confirmed that both the carbon concentration and the pouring temperature of cast steel strongly influence the quality of the joint between the working layer and the base part of the bimetallic casting, and in consequence their qualitative and quantitative influence on the microstructure and shape of the transition zones on the austenitic steel—ferritic-pearlitic cast steel boundary.

Conclusions

Based on the conducted examinations the following conclusions have been formulated:

  1. 1.

    Achievement of the necessary, permanent joint between the plate of alloy steel sort X2CrNi 18-9 and unalloyed cast steel in a bimetallic casting at the assumed solidification module and a properly prepared contact surface by application of the presented activator demands simultaneously two conditions, i.e., a suitable, high pouring temperature of liquid cast steel poured into the mold in which a 5 mm thick plate of austenitic alloy steel is placed and also a suitable difference in the carbon concentration between both joined materials. Fulfilling only one of these conditions results in obtaining a defective casting which has no application characteristics.

  2. 2.

    The decisive phenomena needed to create a permanent joint between two components of the bimetallic casting are carbon and heat transport in the direction of high-carbon and hot material of the base part, which is poured into the mold in the form of liquid metal to a low-carbon and cold material of the working layer, which is placed in the mold cavity in the form of a monolithic insert.

  3. 3.

    As a result of carbon and heat transport transition zones were created in the microstructure of the bimetallic casting which contained on the side of the unalloyed cast steel an increased amount of ferrite and on the side of the chromium-nickel alloy steel some amount of martensite. The decarbonising zone of the base part with the carbonizing zone of the working layer joins the pearlitic zone at a thickness of tens of micrometers.