Skip to main content
Log in

The Effect of Weld Profile and Geometries of Butt Weld Joints on Fatigue Life Under Cyclic Tensile Loading

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fatigue life of welded joint was calculated based on numerical integration of simple Paris’ law and a reliable solution of the stress intensity factor (SIF). The initial crack length (ai) was assumed to be equal to 0.1 mm in case of weld toe. This length was satisfactory for different butt joints geometries. The comparisons with the available data from standards and literature were demonstrated. It was shown numerically that the machining of weld reinforcements will increase the fatigue life. The increase of plate thickness decreases the fatigue strength (FAT) and the number of cycles to failure when using the proportional scaling of crack length. The validation processes of the current calculations have been shown. Therefore, it can be concluded that it will prevent the unnecessary waste of time consumed to carry out the experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  1. A. Hobbacher, Recommendations for Fatigue Design of Welded Joints and Components, IIW Doc., No XIII-1965r14-03/XV-1127r14-03, International Institute of Welding, 2006

  2. A. Hobbacher, Recommendations for Fatigue Design of Welded Joints and Components, IIW Document XIII-2151-07/XV-1254-07, International Institute of Welding—IIW/IIS, 2007

  3. British Standards Institution, Guidance on Methods for the Acceptance of Flaws in Structure, PD 6493, BS 7910, Appendix J, 2001

  4. J. Lindqvist, “Fatigue Strengths Thickness Dependence in Welded Construction,” M.Sc. thesis, Borlänge, Sweden, 2002

  5. S.J. Maddox, Fatigue Strength of Welded Structures, 2nd ed., Abington Publishing, Cambridge, UK, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  6. P.J. Singh, D.R.G. Achar, B. Guha, and H. Nordberg, Fatigue Life Predication of Gas Tungsten Arc Welded AISI, 304L Cruciform Joints with Different LOP Sizes, Int. J. Fatigue, 2003, 25(1), p 1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. I. Poutiainen and G. Marquis, A Fatigue Assessment Method Based on Weld Stress, Int. J. Fatigue, 2006, 28(9), p 1037–1046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Engesvik, Analysis of the Uncertainty of the Fatigue Capacity of Welded Joints, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway, 1983

  9. N. Karlsson and P.-H. Lenanader, “Analysis of Fatigue Life in Two Welded Class System,” M.Sc. thesis, LITH-IKP-EX—05/2302-SE, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Linköping University, Sweden, 2005

  10. A. Almukhtar, P. Hübner, S. Henkel, and H. Biermann, Fatigue Life Calculation of Welded Joints with Fracture Mechanics Methods, DVM, Wuppertal, Germany, 2009, p 63–72 (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Almukhtar, H. Biermann, P. Hübner, and S. Henkel, Fatigue Life Prediction of Fillet Welded Cruciform Joints Based on Fracture Mechanics Method, Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Fatigue and Fracture in the Infrastructure, Philadelphia, USA, July 26–29, 2009

  12. A. Almukhtar, H. Biermann, P. Hübner, and S. Henkel, Fatigue Crack Propagation Life Calculation in Welded Joints, Proceedings of International Conference on Crack Paths (CP 2009), Italy, September 23–25, 2009, p 391–397

  13. A.M. Almukhtar, H. Biermann, P. Hübner, and S. Henkel, Determination of Some Parameters for Fatigue Life in Welded Joints Using Fracture Mechanics Method, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., doi:10.1007/s11665-010-9621-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. T. Nykänen, G. Marquis, and T. Björk, Fatigue Analysis of Non-Load-Carrying Fillet Welded Cruciform Joints, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2007, 74(3), p 399–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cornell Fracture Group, FRANC2D Version 3.2, http://www.cfg.cornell.edu

  16. P. Wawrzynek and A. Ingraffea, FRANC2D: A Two-Dimensional Crack Propagation Simulator, Version 2.7 User’s Guide, NASA Contractor Report 4572, 1994

  17. F.V. Lawrence, Overview of Weldment Fatigue Life Prediction, University of Illinois, Urbana, USA, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. Wu, “Fatigue Crack Propagation Behavior of Welded and Weld Repaired 5083 Aluminum Alloy Joints,” M.Sc. thesis, School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Australia, 2002

  19. N.T. Nguyen and M.A. Wahab, A Theoretical Study of the Effect of Weld Geometry Parameters on Fatigue Crack Propagation Life, J. Eng. Fract. Mech., 1995, 51(I), p 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Germanischer Lloyd Aktiengesellschaft, Rules for Classification and Construction, Part I Ship Technology, Section 20C, Fatigue Strength, Germanischer Lloyd Aktiengesellschaft, GL 2007, www.gl-group.com

  21. National Institute of Materials Science (NIMS), Data Sheet on Fatigue Properties of Non-Load-Carrying of Cruciform Welded Joints of SM490B Rolled Steel for Welded Structure-Effect of Plate Thickness (Part 3, Thickness 80 mm), Fatigue Data Sheet, No. 108, Japan, 2009

  22. D. Radaj, Design and Analysis of Fatigue Resistant Welded Structures, 1st ed., Abington Publishing, 1990

  23. M.S. Alam, “Structural Integrity and Fatigue Crack Propagation Life Assessment of Welded and Weld-Repaired Structures,” Ph.D. dissertation, Louisiana State University, USA, 2005

  24. M.T. Ohta and N. Suzuki, Evaluation of Effect of Plate Thickness on Fatigue Strength of Butt Welded Joints by a Test Maintaining Maximum Stress at Yield Strength, Eng. Fract. Mech., 1990, 37(5), p 987–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. G. Bimalendu, Effect of Specimen Geometry on Fatigue of Welded Joints, Eng. Fract. Mech., 1993, 46(1), p 35–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. BS 5400 Pt. 10, British Standards Institution, 1982

  27. BS 7608, British Standards Institution, 1993

  28. C.M. Allen, C.H.J. Gerritsen, Y. Zhang, and J. Mawella, Hybrid Laser-MAG Welding Procedures and Weld Properties in 4 mm, 6 mm and 8 mm Thickness C-Mn Steels, The IIW Commission IV/XII, Intermediate Meeting, Vigo, Spain, April 11–13, 2007

  29. N.T. Nguyen and M.A. Wahab, The Effect of Undercut and Residual Stresses on Fatigue Behaviour of Misaligned Butt Joints, Eng. Fract. Mech., 1996, 55(3), p 453–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. N.T. Nguyen and M.A. Wahab, The Effect of Residual Stresses and Weld Geometry on the Improvement of Fatigue Life, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1995, 48, p 581–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author would like to thankfully appreciate the support for this research received from the State of Saxony and Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, Institute of Materials Engineering. The fruitful discussions with Dr. Z. Barsoum, from the Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden are also gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. Al-Mukhtar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Al-Mukhtar, A.M., Biermann, H., Hübner, P. et al. The Effect of Weld Profile and Geometries of Butt Weld Joints on Fatigue Life Under Cyclic Tensile Loading. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 20, 1385–1391 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-010-9775-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-010-9775-1

Keywords

Navigation