Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation of the Taiwan FRAX® calculator for the prediction of fracture risk

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Osteoporosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

The Taiwan FRAX® calculator was validated to predict incident fractures preliminarily. Cutoffs of FRAX probability for predicting major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture were proposed as 9.5% and 4% in Taiwanese individuals.

Purpose

FRAX® is an algorithm used to calculate fracture probabilities based on clinical risk factors (CRFs) and bone mineral density (BMD). The country-specific Taiwan FRAX calculator has not been validated since its establishment in 2010. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the predictive performance of the Taiwan FRAX calculator using longitudinal fracture data.

Methods

A total of 1975 subjects, aged ≧ 40 years old, from Yunlin and Tianliao cohorts in Taiwan during the period 2009–2010, were identified and completely connected with the 2008–2016 National Health Insurance Research Database.

Results

During the average 6.8 ± 1.1 years of follow-up, 160 incident major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) were identified. The predictive ability assessing based on the observed to expected fractures (O/E) ratio calculated with the FRAX probability adjusted for 6.8 years were 1.19 (95%CI 1.02–1.39) for MOF, and 1.07 (95%CI 0.82–1.39) for hip fractures. In the discriminative statistics, the AUC for prediction of major osteoporotic fractures using FRAX was 0.75 without and 0.77 with BMD (AUC for hip fracture was 0.75 without and 0.77 with BMD). The optimal cutoff value was 9.5% of the FRAX score with BMD for all major osteoporotic fractures, with good sensitivity (76.9%) and specificity (65.3%). For hip fractures, the optimal cutoff point for the FRAX probability with BMD was 4.0%, and the sensitivity and specificity were 74.4% and 68.3%, respectively.

Conclusion

The Taiwan FRAX® calculator was validated to predict incident fractures preliminarily. Cutoffs are proposed for predicting fracture risk in Taiwanese individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

FRAX:

Fracture risk assessment

BMD:

Bone mineral density

MOF:

Major osteoporotic fracture

CRF:

Clinical risk factor

NHI:

National Health Insurance

NHIRD:

National Health Insurance Research Database

References

  1. America’s Bone Health (2002) The state of osteoporosis and low bone mass in our nation. National Osteoporosis Foundation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A (2007) Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res 22(3):465–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang NP, Deng CY, Chou YJ, Chen PQ, Lin CH, Chou P, Chang HJ (2006) Estimated prevalence of osteoporosis from a Nationwide Health Insurance database in Taiwan. Health Policy 75(3):329–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.04.009 (Epub 2005 Jun 8)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yeh C-H, Yeh S-C (2007) Prevalence and risk factors of osteoporosis among adults undergoing health examinations in Southern Taiwan. Taiwan J Public Health 26(6):462–471

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cheung CL, Ang SB, Chadha M, Chow ES, Chung YS, Hew FL, Jaisamrarn U, Ng H, Takeuchi Y, Wu CH, Xia W, Yu J, Fujiwara S (2018) An updated hip fracture projection in Asia: the Asian Federation of Osteoporosis Societies study. Osteoporos Sarcopenia 4(1):16–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afos.2018.03.003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu CH, McCloskey EV, Lee JK, Itabashi A, Prince R, Yu W, Li-Yu J, Chionh SB, Zhao Y, Shin CS, Gunawan T, Tsai KS, Chieng PU, Changlai SP, Chan DC, Chen JF, Tanner SB, Hans DB, Kanis JA, Chang YF, Sun ZJ, Yang RS (2014) Consensus of Official Position of IOF/ISCD FRAX Initiatives in Asia-Pacific Region. J Clin Densitom 17(1):150–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2013.06.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanis JA on behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group (2008) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary healthcare level. Technical report. WHO Collaborating Centre, University of Sheffield, UK.

  8. Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, De Laet C, Johansson H, Johnell O, Jonsson B, Oden A, Zethraeus N, Pfleger B, Khaltaev N (2005) Assessment of fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 16(6):581–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1780-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E (2008) FRAX™ and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19(4):385–397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/FRAX/tool.aspx?country=26

  11. Liu IT, Liang FW, Wang ST, Chang CM, Lu TH, Wu CH (2021) The effects of falls on the prediction of osteoporotic fractures: epidemiological cohort study. Arch Osteoporos 16(1):110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-021-00977-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ou LC, Sun ZJ, Chang YF, Chang CS, Chao TH, Kuo PH, Lin RM, Wu CH (2013) Epidemiological survey of quantitative ultrasound in risk assessment of falls in middle-aged and elderly people. PLoS ONE 8(8):e71053. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071053

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chao YJ, Chen CY, Wu CF, Chang CS, Kuo PH, Chang HJ, Tu CW, Chang YF, Wu CH (2010) The prevalence of osteoporosis and associated risk factors in elderly females living in a rural community in Taiwan. Taiwan J Fam Med 20(2):64–73

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen HY, Chang YF, Chang CS, Chen CY, Yang YC, Chen JF, Wu CH (2011) Osteoporosis and status of management in old males lived in rural community. Tw Geriatrics Gerontol 6(2):116–129

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chang CS, Chang YF, Wang MW, Chen CY, Chao YJ, Chang HJ, Kuo PH, Yang YC, Wu CH (2013) Inverse relationship between central obesity and osteoporosis in osteoporotic drug naïve elderly females: the Tianliao Old People (TOP) Study. J Clin Densitom 16(2):204–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2012.03.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang YF, Chang CS, Wang MW, Wu CF, Chen CY, Chang HJ, Kuo PH, Wu CH (2016) Effects of age and body mass index on thoracolumbar spine X-ray for diagnosing osteoporosis in elderly women: Tianliao Old People (TOP) Study 07. PLoS ONE 11(9):e0161773. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161773

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chang CS, Chang YF, Liu PY, Chen CY, Tsai YS, Wu CH (2012) Smoking, habitual tea drinking and metabolic syndrome in elderly men living in rural community: the Tianliao Old People (TOP) Study 02. PLoS ONE 7(6):e38874. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. National Health Insurance Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan, R.O.C. (2014) National Health Insurance Annual Report 2014–2015.

  19. Fu SH, Wang CY, Hung CC, Lee CC, Yang RS, Huang CC, Farn CJ, Lin WH, Chen HM, Hsiao FY, Lin JW, Li CY (2021) Increased fracture risk after discontinuation of anti-osteoporosis medications among hip fracture patients: a population-based cohort study. J Intern Med 290(6):1194–1205. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.13354 (Epub 2021 Aug 2)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tebé Cordomí C, Del Río LM, Di Gregorio S, Casas L, Estrada MD, Kotzeva A, Espallargues M (2013) Validation of the FRAX predictive model for major osteoporotic fracture in a historical cohort of Spanish women. J Clin Densitom 16(2):231–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2012.05.007 (Epub 2012 Jun 29)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tamaki J, Iki M, Kadowaki E, Sato Y, Kajita E, Kagamimori S, Kagawa Y, Yoneshima H (2011) Fracture risk prediction using FRAX(R): a 10-year follow-up survey of the Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study. Osteoporos Int 22:3037–3045

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jang EJ, Lee YK, Choi HJ, Ha YC, Jang S, Shin CS, Cho NH (2016) Osteoporotic fracture risk assessment using bone mineral density in Korean: a community-based cohort study. J Bone Metab 23:34–39

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Su Y, Leung J, Kwok T (2018) The role of previous falls in major osteoporotic fracture prediction in conjunction with FRAX in older Chinese men and women: the Mr. OS and Ms. OS cohort study in Hong Kong. Osteoporos Int 29:355–363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lau EM, Lee JK, Suriwongpaisal P, Saw SM, De Das S, Khir A, Sambrook P (2001) The incidence of hip fracture in four Asian countries: the Asian Osteoporosis Study (AOS). Osteoporos Int 12(3):239–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980170135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Youden WJ (1950) Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 3(1):32–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1%3c32::aid-cncr2820030106%3e3.0.co;2-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG (2015) Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ 350:g7594. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Azagra R, Zwart M, Encabo G, Aguyé A, Martin-Sánchez JC, Puchol-Ruiz N, Gabriel-Escoda P, Ortiz-Alinque S, Gené E, Iglesias M, Moriña D, Diaz-Herrera MA, Utzet M, Manresa JM (2016) Rationale of the Spanish FRAX model in decision-making for predicting osteoporotic fractures: an update of FRIDEX cohort of Spanish women. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17:262. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1096-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Steyerberg EW, Moons KG, Hayden JA, Perel P, Schroter S, Riley RD, Hemingway H, Altman DG, PROGRESS Group (2013) Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: prognostic model research. PLoS Med 10(2):e1001381. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001381 (Epub 2013 Feb 5)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dawson-Hughes B (2008) National Osteoporosis Foundation Guide Committee. A revised clinician’s guide to the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:2463–2465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jiang X, Gruner M, Trémollieres F, Pluskiewicz W, Sornay-Rendu E, Adamczyk P (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of FRAX in predicting the 10-year risk of osteoporotic fractures using the USA treatment thresholds: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone 99:20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2017.02.008 (Epub 2017 Mar 6)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ip TP, Cheung SK, Cheung TC, Choi TC, Chow SL, Ho YY, Kan SY, Kung WC, Lee KK, Leung KL, Leung YY, Lo ST, Sy CT, Wong YW; Osteoporosis Society of Hong Kong (2013) The Osteoporosis Society of Hong Kong (OSHK): 2013 OSHK guideline for clinical management of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 19(Suppl 2):1–40

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cheung E, Kung AWC, Tan KCB (2014) Outcomes of applying the NOF, NOGG and Taiwanese guidelines to a cohort of Chinese early postmenopausal women. Clinl Endocrinol 80:200–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang Z, Ou Y, Sheng Z, Liao E (2014) How to decide intervention thresholds based on FRAX in central south Chinese postmenopausal women. Endocrine 45:195–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Orimo H, Nakamura T, Hosoi T, Iki M, Uenishi K, Endo N, Ohta H, Shiraki M, Sugimoto T, Suzuki T, Soen S, Nishizawa Y, Hagino H, Fukunaga M, Fujiwara S (2012) Japanese 2011 guidelines for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis—executive summary. Arch Osteoporos 7(1):3–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-012-0109-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kanis JA, Harvey NC, Cooper C, Johansson H, Odén A, McCloskey EV; Advisory Board of the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (2016) A systematic review of intervention thresholds based on FRAX: a report prepared for the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group and the International Osteoporosis Foundation. Arch Osteoporos 11(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-016-0278-z (Epub 2016 Jul 27)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chan DC, McCloskey EV, Chang CB, Lin KP, Lim LC, Tsai KS, Yang RS (2107) Establishing and evaluating FRAX(®) probability thresholds in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 116(3):161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2016.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. World Health Organization. Classification of Disease (ICD). 2016. Available at: http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/

  38. Masud T, Binkley N, Boonen S, Hannan MT, Members FPDC (2011) Official positions for FRAX(R) clinical regarding falls and frailty: can falls and frailty be used in FRAX(R)? From Joint Official Positions Development Conference of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and International Osteoporosis Foundation on FRAX(R). J Clin Densitom 14:194–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ou LC, Chang YF, Chang CS, Chiu CJ, Chao TH, Sun ZJ, Lin RM, Wu CH (2017) Epidemiological survey of the feasibility of broadband ultrasound attenuation measured using calcaneal quantitative ultrasound to predict the incidence of falls in the middle-aged and elderly. BMJ Open 7(1):e013420. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013420

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Briot K, Paternotte S, Kolta S, Eastell R, Reid DM, Felsenberg D, Glüer CC, Roux C (2013) Added value of trabecular bone score to bone mineral density for prediction of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women: the OPUS study. Bone 57(1):232–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2013.07.040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Leslie WD, Lix LM, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey E, Kanis JA (2011) Spine-hip discordance and fracture risk assessment: a physician-friendly FRAX enhancement. Osteoporos Int 22(3):839–847

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the administrative and technical support received from the National Cheng Kung University Hospital Dou-Liou Branch, Yun-Lin county; Tian Liao District Public Health Center, Kaohsiung City; the National Health Insurance Research Database, the Center for Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kaohsiung Medical University, and National Cheng Kung University Hospital. Finally, we are grateful to the Health Data Science Center, the National Cheng Kung University Hospital, for providing administrative and technical support.

Funding

This research was funded by research grants MOST106-2314-B-006–064-MY2 and MOST 108–2314-B-006–043-MY2 from the Ministry of Science and Technology and grants from NCKUH-10909042. This work was also partially supported by research grant DOH-98HP-A9802-6, from the Bureau of Health Promotion, Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design of the study: ITL, FWL, YFC, CSC, CHW. Statistical analyses: ITL, CHW, CCL, FWL. Research data interpretation: all coauthors. Acquisition of data: YFC, CSC, ZJS, CHW. Suggestions and discussion: THL, CSC. Drafting of the article: ITL, CHW. Critical revision of the manuscript: all coauthors. Final approval of the manuscript: all coauthors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chin-Sung Chang or Chih-Hsing Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 22 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, IT., Liang, FW., Li, CC. et al. Validation of the Taiwan FRAX® calculator for the prediction of fracture risk. Arch Osteoporos 17, 27 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01068-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01068-y

Keywords

Navigation