Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Referral pattern for DXA scanning in a tertiary care centre from southern India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Osteoporosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Referral patterns for bone mineral density testing by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning are seldom studied. In our study, the overall proportion of referrals from specialties remained low. This highlights the need for adequate utilisation of DXA by specialties treating subjects at risk for osteoporosis.

Purpose/objectives

The knowledge of referral patterns for DXA scanning (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry) for bone mineral density (BMD) measurement is relevant in a developing country like India. We studied the referral source and clinical and densitometric profile of patients referred for DXA scanning at a south Indian tertiary care centre.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study over 3 months and included subjects referred during this period for BMD assessment (lumbar spine and femoral neck) by DXA scan. Details regarding referring departments and reasons for referral were collected. The number of patients seen in individual departments was obtained during the study period and respective proportions of patients referred were calculated.

Results

Of the 1932 subjects included in the study, we observed a definite female preponderance (90.2%), with a mean (SD) age of 51.6 (13.3) years. The greatest number of referrals came from the departments of rheumatology (37%; n = 724) and endocrinology (20%; n = 382). Overall, 36% were referred for inflammatory arthritis or systemic inflammatory disorders (n = 696) and 34% for postmenopausal state screening (n = 657). In relation to the individual outpatient strength, the departments who referred the highest proportion of their patients were rheumatology (6.8%), endocrinology (1.76%) and geriatrics (1.05%). A diagnosis of osteoporosis at any one site was made in 41% (448 of 1107) and the BMD was below the expected range for age in 37% (304 of 825) of the referrals.

Conclusion

Most referrals for DXA scanning were from rheumatology. Among the referred patients, about two fifth had osteoporosis and over one third had BMD below expected range for age. Although referrals by rheumatology were relatively higher, overall referrals from all departments remained low. This underscores the need for adequate utilisation of DXA by specialties treating subjects at risk for osteoporosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khadilkar AV, Mandlik RM (2015) Epidemiology and treatment of osteoporosis in women: an Indian perspective. Int J Womens Health 7:841–850

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Paul TV, Thomas N, Seshadri MS, Oommen R, Jose A, Mahendri NV (2008) Prevalence of osteoporosis in ambulatory postmenopausal women from a semiurban region in southern India: relationship to calcium nutrition and vitamin D status. Endocr Pract Off J Am Coll Endocrinol Am Assoc Clin Endocrinol 14(6):665–671

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shetty S, Kapoor N, Naik D, Asha HS, Prabu S, Thomas N et al (2014) Osteoporosis in healthy South Indian males and the influence of life style factors and vitamin d status on bone mineral density. J Osteoporos 2014:723238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carey JJ, Delaney MF (2017) Utility of DXA for monitoring, technical aspects of DXA BMD measurement and precision testing. Bone 104:44–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jeremiah MP, Unwin BK, Greenawald MH, Casiano VE (2015) Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis. Am Fam Physician 92(4):261–268

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shane ES, Dempster DW (2001) Bone quantification and dynamics of bone turnover by histomorphometric analysis- principles and practice of endocrinology and metabolism, Third edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore,USA, pp 541–548

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shepherd JA, Schousboe JT, Broy SB, Engelke K, Leslie WD (2015) Executive summary of the 2015 ISCD position development conference on advanced measures from DXA and QCT: fracture prediction beyond BMD. J Clin Densitom Off J Int Soc Clin Densitom 18(3):274–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Paul TV, Selvan SA, Asha HS, Thomas N, Venkatesh K, Oommen AT et al (2015) Hypovitaminosis D and other risk factors of femoral neck fracture in South Indian postmenopausal women: a pilot study. J Clin Diagn Res:JCDR 9(6):OC19–OC22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jha RM, Mithal A, Malhotra N, Brown EM (2010) Pilot case-control investigation of risk factors for hip fractures in the urban Indian population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Varthakavi PK, Joshi AS, Bhagwat NM, Chadha MD (2014) Osteoporosis treatment in India: call for action. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 18(4):441–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Satyaraddi A, Shetty S, Kapoor N, Cherian KE, Naik D, Thomas N, Paul TV (2017) Performance of risk assessment tools for predicting osteoporosis in south Indian rural elderly men. Arch Osteoporos 12(1):35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Malhotra N, Mithal A (2008) Osteoporosis in Indians. Indian J Med Res 127(3):263–268

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shivane VK, Sarathi V, Lila AR, Bandgar T, Joshi SR, Menon PS, Shah NS (2012) Peak bone mineral density and its determinants in an Asian Indian population. J Clin Densitom Off J Int Soc Clin Densitom 15(2):152–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Torpy AMJ, Brennan SL, Kotowicz MA, Pasco JA (2012) Reasons for referral to bone densitometry in men and women aged 20-49 years: population-based data. Arch Osteoporos 7:173–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Health Quality Ontario (2006) Utilization of DXA bone mineral densitometry in Ontario: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 6(20):1–180

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hayes BL, Curtis JR, Laster A, Saag K, Tanner SB, Liu C, Womack C, Johnson KC, Khaliq F, Carbone LD (2010) Osteoporosis care in the United States after declines in reimbursements for DXA. J Clin Densitom Off J Int Soc Clin Densitom 13(4):352–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, Lewiecki EM, Tanner B, Randall S, Lindsay R, National Osteoporosis Foundation (2014) Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int J Establ Result Coop Eur Found Osteoporos Natl Osteoporos Found USA 25(10):2359–2381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shetty S, Kapoor N, Dian Bondu J, Antonisamy B, Thomas N, Paul TV (2016) Bone turnover markers and bone mineral density in healthy mother-daughter pairs from South India. Clin Endocrinol 85(5):725–732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim SY, Schneeweiss S, Liu J, Solomon DH (2012) Effects of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs on non-vertebral fracture risk in rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based cohort study. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res 27(4):789–796

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamamoto Y, Turkiewicz A, Wingstrand H, Englund M (2015) Fragility fractures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis compared with the general population. J Rheumatol 42(11):2055–2058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dubrovsky AM, Lim MJ, Lane NE (2018) Osteoporosis in rheumatic diseases: anti-rheumatic drugs and the skeleton. Calcif Tissue Int 102(5):607–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tanner SB, Moore CF (2012) A review of the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in rheumatology. Open Access Rheumatol Res Rev 4:99–107

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zerbini CAF, Clark P, Mendez-Sanchez L, Pereira RMR, Messina OD, Uña CR et al (2017) Biologic therapies and bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis. Osteoporos Int J Establ Result Coop Eur Found Osteoporos Natl Osteoporos Found USA 28(2):429–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dobbins AG, Brennan SL, Williams LJ, Kotowicz MA, Sarah B, Birch Y, Pasco JA (2014) Who are the older Australians referred for a bone density scan? Data from the Barwon region. Arch Osteoporos 9:196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lewiecki EM, Laster AJ, Miller PD, Bilezikian JP (2012) More bone density testing is needed, not less. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res 27(4):739–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Amin S, Felson DT (2001) Osteoporosis in men. Rheum Dis Clin N Am 27(1):19–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Al Attia H, Adams B (2007) Osteoporosis in men: are we referring enough for DXA and how? Clin Rheumatol 26(7):1123–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gopinathan NR, Sen RK, Behera P, Aggarwal S, Khandelwal N, Sen M (2016) Awareness of osteoporosis in postmenopausal Indian women: an evaluation of osteoporosis health belief scale. J -Life Health 7(4):180–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pande K, Pande S, Tripathi S, Kanoi R, Thakur A, Patle S (2005) Poor knowledge about osteoporosis in learned Indian women. J Assoc Physicians India 53:433–436

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Warriner AH, Outman RC, Feldstein AC, Roblin DW, Allison JJ, Curtis JR, Redden DT, Rix MM, Robinson BE, Rosales AG, Safford MM, Saag KG (2014) Effect of self-referral on bone mineral density testing and osteoporosis treatment. Med Care 52(8):743–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nitin Kapoor.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Binu, A.J., Cherian, K.E., Kapoor, N. et al. Referral pattern for DXA scanning in a tertiary care centre from southern India. Arch Osteoporos 13, 133 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-018-0548-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-018-0548-z

Keywords

Navigation