Skip to main content
Log in

Compliance and persistence with treatment with parathyroid hormone for osteoporosis. A Danish national register-based cohort study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Osteoporosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Medical intervention is important in the treatment of osteoporosis, and compliance with medical treatment is essential for an optimal outcome. Based on Danish national registers, we found that compliance with parathyroid hormone (PTH) treatment is high and associated with marital status, working status, and type of PTH treatment.

Purpose

Compliance and persistence are essential for an optimal outcome during medical treatment of osteoporosis. We aimed to evaluate compliance and persistence with treatment with PTH in daily clinical practice in Danish patients and to describe factors affecting compliance.

Methods

Register-based nationwide cohort study on all patients in Denmark initiates PTH or analogue treatment for osteoporosis in 2003–2010 (n = 4281). PTH drugs included were the PTH analogue teriparatide(1–34) and recombinant human PTH (rhPTH(1–84)). Compliance with treatment was calculated by using medication possession ratio (MPR).

Results

In the study period, 3702 patients were exclusively treated with teriparatide and 579 were exclusively treated with rhPTH(1–84). We found that for patients persistent with therapy for at least 18 months and with MPR >0.8, 83 % of the patients in the teriparatide group were compliant versus 72 % in the recombinant PTH group (p < 0.01). Being married/cohabiting, still in the labor market, and taking teriparatide were significantly associated with higher compliance, whereas age, gender, level of education, income, alcoholism, and Charlson comorbidity index were not associated with compliance.

Conclusion

Compliance with PTH treatment overall is high, with teriparatide compliance higher than rhPTH(1–84), in patients persistent to therapy for 18 months. Compliance is associated with marital status, working status, and type of PTH treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy, March 7–29, 2000: highlights of the conference. South Med J 94:569–73

  2. Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L (2007) Increased mortality in patients with a hip fracture-effect of pre-morbid conditions and post-fracture complications. Osteoporos Int 18:1583–1593

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, Sernbo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Petterson C, De Laet C, Jonsson B (2004) Mortality after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 15:38–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nazrun AS, Tzar MN, Mokhtar SA, Mohamed IN (2014) A systematic review of the outcomes of osteoporotic fracture patients after hospital discharge: morbidity, subsequent fractures, and mortality. Ther Clin Risk Manag 10:937–948

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang CY, Tang CH, Chen KC, Huang KC, Huang KC (2015) The mortality and direct medical costs of osteoporotic fractures among postmenopausal women in Taiwan. Osteoporos Int. doi:10.1007/s00198-015-3238-3

  6. Osnes EK, Lofthus CM, Meyer HE, Falch JA, Nordsletten L, Cappelen I, Kristiansen IS (2004) Consequences of hip fracture on activities of daily life and residential needs. Osteoporos Int 15:567–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Strom O, Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Lidgren L, Ponzer S, Svensson O, Abdon P, Ornstein E, Ceder L, Thorngren KG, Sernbo I, Jonsson B (2008) Long-term cost and effect on quality of life of osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden. Acta Orthop 79:269–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lips P, van Schoor NM (2005) Quality of life in patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 16:447–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hall SE, Criddle RA, Comito TL, Prince RL (1999) A case–control study of quality of life and functional impairment in women with long-standing vertebral osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 9:508–515

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Seeman E, Compston J, Adachi J, Brandi ML, Cooper C, Dawson-Hughes B, Jonsson B, Pols H, Cramer JA (2007) Non-compliance: the Achilles’ heel of anti-fracture efficacy. Osteoporos Int 18:711–719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller NH (1997) Compliance with treatment regimens in chronic asymptomatic diseases. Am J Med 102:43–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cramer JA, Gold DT, Silverman SL, Lewiecki EM (2007) A systematic review of persistence and compliance with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 18:1023–1031

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gold DT. National Osteoporosis Foundation. Osteoporosis clinical updates. Compliance and persistence with osteoporosis. Wasington DC; spring 2013 http://nof.org/files/nof/public/content/file/1665/upload/828.pdf (approached Aug 14, 2015)

  14. Cramer JA, Roy A, Burrell A, Fairchild CJ, Fuldeore MJ, Ollendorf DA, Wong PK (2008) Medication compliance and persistence: terminology and definitions. Value Health 11:44–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Briot K, Ravaud P, Dargent-Molina P, Zylberman M, Liu-Leage S, Roux C (2009) Persistence with teriparatide in postmenopausal osteoporosis; impact of a patient education and follow-up program: the French experience. Osteoporos Int 20:625–630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ziller V, Zimmermann SP, Kalder M, Ziller M, Seker-Pektas B, Hellmeyer L, Hadji P (2010) Adherence and persistence in patients with severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide. Curr Med Res Opin 26:675–681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Arden NK, Earl S, Fisher DJ, Cooper C, Carruthers S, Goater M (2006) Persistence with teriparatide in patients with osteoporosis: the UK experience. Osteoporos Int 17:1626–1629

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Caro JJ, Ishak KJ, Huybrechts KF, Raggio G, Naujoks C (2004) The impact of compliance with osteoporosis therapy on fracture rates in actual practice. Osteoporos Int 15:1003–1008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Weycker D, Macarios D, Edelsberg J, Oster G (2007) Compliance with osteoporosis drug therapy and risk of fracture. Osteoporos Int 18:271–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Silverman SL, Gold DT, Cramer JA (2007) Reduced fracture rates observed only in patients with proper persistence and compliance with bisphosphonate therapies. South Med J 100:1214–1218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Danmarks Statistik Population and population projections. 2013 http://www.dst.dk/en/Statistik/emner/befolkning-og-befolkningsfremskrivning/folketal Accessed October 2014

  22. McCombs JS, Thiebaud P, McLaughlin-Miley C, Shi J (2004) Compliance with drug therapies for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. Maturitas 48:271–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cramer JA, Amonkar MM, Hebborn A, Altman R (2005) Compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate dosing regimens among women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Curr Med Res Opin 21:1453–1460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Downey TW, Foltz SH, Boccuzzi SJ, Omar MA, Kahler KH (2006) Adherence and persistence associated with the pharmacologic treatment of osteoporosis in a managed care setting. South Med J 99:570–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ziller V, Kostev K, Kyvernitakis I, Boeckhoff J, Hadji P (2012) Persistence and compliance of medications used in the treatment of osteoporosis—analysis using a large scale, representative, longitudinal German database. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 50:315–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Papaioannou A, Ioannidis G, Adachi JD, Sebaldt RJ, Ferko N, Puglia M, Brown J, Tenenhouse A, Olszynski WP, Boulos P, Hanley DA, Josse R, Murray TM, Petrie A, Goldsmith CH (2003) Adherence to bisphosphonates and hormone replacement therapy in a tertiary care setting of patients in the CANDOO database. Osteoporos Int 14:808–813

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Clowes JA, Peel NF, Eastell R (2004) The impact of monitoring on adherence and persistence with antiresorptive treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:1117–1123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rajzbaum G, Jakob F, Karras D, Ljunggren O, Lems WF, Langdahl BL, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Walsh JB, Gibson A, Tynan AJ, Marin F (2008) Characterization of patients in the European Forsteo Observational Study (EFOS): postmenopausal women entering teriparatide treatment in a community setting. Curr Med Res Opin 24:377–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ljunggren O, Benhamou CL, Dekker J, Kapetanos G, Kocjan T, Langdahl BL, Napoli N, Petto H, Nikolic T, Lindh E (2014) Study description and baseline characteristics of the population enrolled in a multinational observational study of extended teriparatide use (ExFOS). Curr Med Res Opin 30:1607–1616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Foster SA, Foley KA, Meadows ES, Johnston JA, Wang SS, Pohl GM, Long SR (2011) Adherence and persistence with teriparatide among patients with commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid insurance. Osteoporos Int 22:551–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kyvernitakis I, Kostev K, Kurth A, Albert US, Hadji P (2014) Differences in persistency with teriparatide in patients with osteoporosis according to gender and health care provider. Osteoporos Int 25:2721–2728

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rossini M, Bianchi G, Di Munno O, Giannini S, Minisola S, Sinigaglia L, Adami S, Treatment of Osteoporosis in clinical Practice (TOP) Study Group (2006) Determinants of adherence to osteoporosis treatment in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 17:914–921

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rajzbaum G, Grados F, Evans D, Liu-Leage S, Petto H, Augendre-Ferrante B (2014) Treatment persistence and changes in fracture risk, back pain, and quality of life amongst patients treated with teriparatide in routine clinical care in France: results from the European Forsteo Observational Study. Joint Bone Spine 81:69–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Nevitt MC, Chen P, Dore RK, Reginster JY, Kiel DP, Zanchetta JR, Glass EV, Krege JH (2006) Reduced risk of back pain following teriparatide treatment: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 17:273–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Moricke R, Rettig K, Bethke TD (2011) Use of recombinant human parathyroid hormone(1–84) in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicentre, observational cohort study of the effects of treatment on quality of life and pain—the PROPOSE study. Clin Drug Investig 31:87–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Langdahl BL, Rajzbaum G, Jakob F, Karras D, Ljunggren O, Lems WF, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Walsh JB, Barker C, Kutahov A, Marin F (2009) Reduction in fracture rate and back pain and increased quality of life in postmenopausal women treated with teriparatide: 18-month data from the European Forsteo Observational Study (EFOS). Calcif Tissue Int 85:484–493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR, Prince R, Gaich GA, Reginster JY, Hodsman AB, Eriksen EF, Ish-Shalom S, Genant HK, Wang O, Mitlak BH (2001) Effect of parathyroid hormone (1–34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 344:1434–1441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Greenspan SL, Bone HG, Ettinger MP, Hanley DA, Lindsay R, Zanchetta JR, Blosch CM, Mathisen AL, Morris SA, Marriott TB, Treatment of Osteoporosis with Parathyroid Hormone Study Group (2007) Effect of recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1–84) on vertebral fracture and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 146:326–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by research grant from Nordsjællands Hospital—Hillerød—and grants from Eli Lilly, The Foundation of Tvergaard, The Foundation of Olga Bryde Nielsen, and The Foundation of Harald Jensen and wife. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, preparation of the manuscript, or decision to publish.

Conflicts of interest

AT has received a grant from Eli Lilly.

PV has received unrestricted research grants from Servier and MSD Danmark and travel grants from Amgen, MSD, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and Servier.

PE is an advisory board member of Eli Lilly, MSD, and Amgen and has received lecture fees from Eli Lilly and Amgen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne-Luise Thorsteinsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thorsteinsson, AL., Vestergaard, P. & Eiken, P. Compliance and persistence with treatment with parathyroid hormone for osteoporosis. A Danish national register-based cohort study. Arch Osteoporos 10, 35 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-015-0237-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-015-0237-0

Keywords

Navigation