Skip to main content
Log in

Regulations and guidelines should be strengthened urgently for re-evaluation on post-marketing medicines in China

  • Feature Article
  • Published:
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviewed the situation of regulations and guidelines on post-marketing medicines in the developed countries and in China. The developed countries have accumulated a lot of empirical principles and techniques on postmarketing surveillance (also named pharmacovigilance), therefore, their regulation systems are nearly perfect. In China, the regulations on post-marketing re-evaluation and relative technical guidelines do not cover the whole aspects, even lack in some important aspects, and long-term risk management mechanisms have not been established. So it is urgent to establish new regulations and improve the regulatory system in China based on the existing regulations and guidelines, by learning from the ideas of foreign advanced regulations, then fully integrating them with China’s actual conditions, and cooperating with multidisciplinary researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The World Health Organization. Pharmacovigilance: Ensuring the safe use of medicines, 2004. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2004/WHO_EDM_2004.8.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  2. The World Health Organization. The safety of medicines in public health programmes: pharmacovigilance—an essential tool, 2006. http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/safety/Pharmacovigilance_B.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  3. The World Health Organization. The importance of pharmacovigilance: safety monitoring of medicinal products, 2002. http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Js4893e/10.html

    Google Scholar 

  4. The World Health Organization. Safety monitoring of medicinal products: guidelines for setting up and running a pharmacovigilance centre, 2000. http://who-umc.org/DynPage.aspx?id=105828&mn1=7347&mn2=7259&mn3=7297&mn4=7496

    Google Scholar 

  5. The World Health Organization. Safety of medicines: a guide to detecting and reporting adverse drug reactions, 2002. http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Jh2992e/10.html

    Google Scholar 

  6. The World Health Organization. Guidelines on safety monitoring of herbal medicines in pharmacovigilance systems, 2004. http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/m/abstract/Js7148e/

    Google Scholar 

  7. The United States. Code of federal regulations, CFR part 21, chapter 314, 1985. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm?cfrpart=314

    Google Scholar 

  8. The United States. Federal food, drug, and cosmetic act, 2010. http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/legislation/federalfooddrugandcosmeticactfdcact/default.htm

    Google Scholar 

  9. The Food and Drug Administration. Food and drug administration amendments act of 2007, 2007. http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/legislation/federalfooddrugandcosmeticactfdcact/significantamendmentstothefdcact/foodanddrugadministrationamendmentsactof2007/default.htm

    Google Scholar 

  10. The Food and Drug Administration. Post-marketing commitments study: final report, 2008. http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Reports/UserFeeReports/Studies/ucm201183.htm

    Google Scholar 

  11. The Food and Drug Administration. MedWatch reporting forms, 2003. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/medwatch/medwatch-online.htm

    Google Scholar 

  12. The Food and Drug Administration. 21CFR7 subpart C-recalls (including product corrections)-guidance on policy, procedures and industry responsibilities, 2012. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=7&showFR=1&subpartNode=21:1.0.1.1.5.3

    Google Scholar 

  13. The Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry product recalls, including removals and corrections, 2003. http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/IndustryGuidance/ucm129259.htm

    Google Scholar 

  14. European Union. Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European parliament and of the council of 31 March 2004: laying down community procedures for the authorization and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European medicines agency, 2004. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:136:0001:0033:en:PDF

    Google Scholar 

  15. European Union. Directive 2001/83/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 6 November 2001 on the community code relating to medicinal products for human use, 2001. http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/eudralex/vol-1/dir_2001_83/2001_83_ec_en.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  16. European Union. Regulation (EU) No 1235/2010 of the European parliament and of the council of 15 December 2010, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  17. European Union. Directive 2010/84/EU of the European parliament and of the council of 15 December 2010: amending, as regards pharmacovigilance, directive 2001/83/EC on the community code relating to medicinal products for human use, 2010. http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/eudralex/vol-1/dir_2010_84/dir_2010_84_en.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  18. European Union. The commission implement ing regulation (EU) No 520/2012 on the performance of pharmacovigilance activities, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP), 2012.

  20. Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association. Pharmaceutical administration and regulations in Japan, 2012:138–139. http://www.jpma.or.jp/english/parj/1203.htm

    Google Scholar 

  21. Drug Administration Law of the People’s Republic of China, 2001. http://eng.sfda.gov.cn/WS03/CL0766/61638.htm

  22. Regulations for Implementation of the Drug Administration Law of the People’ s Republic of China, 2002. http://eng.sfda.gov.cn/WS03/CL0767/61640.htm

  23. State Food and Drug Administration. Provisions for drug registration, 2007. http://eng.sfda.gov.cn/WS03/CL0768/61645.htm

    Google Scholar 

  24. State Food and Drug Administration. Provisions for drug insert sheets and labels, 2006. http://eng.sfda.gov.cn/WS03/CL0768/61647.htm

    Google Scholar 

  25. State Food and Drug Administration. Provisions for Drug recall, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ministry of Health. Provisions for adverse drug reaction reporting and monitoring management, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  27. State Food and Drug Administration. Supplementary provisions on Chinese medicine registration, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  28. State Food and Drug Administration. Basic technical requirements for safety re-evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine injections (Draft), 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  29. State Food and Drug Administration. Guidelines for clinical techniques on safety re-evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine injections (Draft), 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Tian  (田 峰).

Additional information

Supported by the Research on Key Techniques of Reevaluation of Post-marketing Chinese Medicines, the Ministry of Science and Technology (No. 2009ZX09502-030) and the Sixth-Science Foundation of Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (No. Z0215)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xie, Ym., Tian, F. Regulations and guidelines should be strengthened urgently for re-evaluation on post-marketing medicines in China. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 19, 483–487 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-013-1500-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-013-1500-0

Keywords

Navigation