Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Current situation and influencing factors of pluriactivity in mountainous and hilly rural areas of Sichuan province, China

  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the current situation of pluriactivity in mountainous and hilly rural areas of Sichuan province was analyzed using representative sample survey data and natural factor data calculated based on 30 m-resolution DEM and GIS. Moreover, using logistic regression model, a quantitative analysis was conducted on factors influencing pluriactivity in terms of individuals, households, communities and natural environmental conditions. The results showed that, (1) only 17.77% of rural laborers in mountainous and hilly areas of Sichuan province were engaged in pluriactivity. Geographically, pluriactivity was mainly chosen according to the “proximity principle”, and was concentrated in construction and service industries; (2) the following factors have a significant influence on whether rural laborers in hilly areas engage in pluriactivity: gender, number of years of education, marriage, number of laborers and time to towns. Those with little influence include: age, health, family size, arable land per capita and per capita income, whether there are elderly people over 75 years and children less than 3 years. According to the main factors affecting pluriactivity, the government should enhance vocational skills training for rural laborers in mountainous and hilly areas, especially for female laborers, further improve transport accessibility and encourage rural laborers, especially female laborers to move into pluriactivity to increase the income of farm households.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alasiaa A, Weersinkb A, Bollmana RD, et al. (2009) Off-farm labor decision of Canadian farm operators: urbanization effects and rural labor market linkages. Journal of Rural Studies 25(1): 12–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atamanov A, Van Den Berg M (2012) Rural nonfarm activities in central Asia: a regional analysis of magnitude, structure, evolution and drivers in the Kyrgyz Republic. Europe-Asia Studies 64(2): 349–368. DOI:10.1080/09668136.2011.642581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman D, Ray C (1994) Farm pluriactivity and rural policy: some evidence from Wales. Journal of Rural Studies 10(1): 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/0743-0167(94)90002-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri C, Mahoney E (2009) Why is diversification an attractive farm adjustment strategy? Insights from Texas farmers and ranchers. Journal of Rural Studies 25: 58–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler I, Clark G, Crockett A, et al. (1996) The development of alternative farm enterprises: A study of family labor farms in the northern Pennines of England. Journal of Rural Studies 12(3): 285–295. DOI: 10.1016/0743-0167(96)00015-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campagne P, Carrère G, Valceschini E (1990) Three agricultural regions of France: Three types of pluriactivity. Journal of Rural Studies 6(4): 415–422. DOI: 10.1016/0743-0167(90)90055-D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen GJ, Fang YP, Gao YJ (2010) Chinese Mountainous Areas Development Report—the New Dynamics and Discussions on Chinese Mountainous Areas Development. The Commercial Press, Beijing. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen XH, Wang CX (2007) An analysis on the determinants of rural households pluriactivity in Suzhou. Chinese Rural Economy (4): 25–31. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dries L, Pascucci S, Gardebroek C (2011) Pluriactivity in Italian agriculture: are farmers using interlinked strategies?. Available online: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/114429/2/Dries_Liesbeth_496.pdf (Accessed on 10 April 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eikeland S, Lie I (1999) Pluriactivity in rural Norway. Journal of Rural Studies 6(4): 405–415. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00010-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller AM (1990) From part-time farming to pluriactivity: a decade of change in rural Europe. Journal of Rural Studies 6(4): 361–373. DOI: 10.1016/0743-0167(90)90049-E

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggblade S, Hazell P, Reardon T (2010) The rural non-farm economy: prospects for growth and poverty reduction. World Development 38(10): 1453–1526. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hailu YG, Rosenberger RS (2004) Modeling migration effects on agricultural lands: a growth equilibrium model. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 33(1): 50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao HG, Li XB, Xin LJ (2010) An analysis on rural households pluriactivity and its reasons. Agricultural Technology and Economy 3: 14–21. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • He ZH (2005) An analytic framework of concurrent business of farmers. China Rural Survey 1: 2–9. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Himanshu H, Lanjouw P, Mukhopadhyay A, et al. (2011) Nonfarm diversification and rural poverty decline: a perspective from Indian sample survey and village study data. Available online: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/38371/ (Accessed on 11 April 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilbery B (1991) Farm diversification as an adjustment strategy on the urban fringe of the west midlands. Journal of Rural Studies 7(3): 207–218. DOI: 10.1016/0743-0167(91)90085-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilbery B, Bowler I (1993) The farm diversification grant scheme: adoption and nonadoption in England and Wales. Enviroment and Planning 11(2): 161–170. DOI:10.1068/c110161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meert H, Van Huylenbroeck G, Vernimmen T, et al. (2005) Farm household survival strategies and diversification on marginal farms. Journal of Rural Studies 21(1): 81–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2004.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilic T, Carletto C, Miluka J, et al. (2009) Rural nonfarm income and its impact on agriculture: evidence from Albania. Agricultural Economics 40(2): 139–160. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00366.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimhi A (2009) Rural non-farm employment and income inequality in southern Ethiopia: the gender dimension. Available online: http://www.fao-ilo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/fao_ilo/pdf/Papers/Kimhi_final.pdf (Accessed on 11 April 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimhi A (2010) Does rural household income depend on neighboring communities? Evidence from Israel. Available online: http://departments.agri.huji.ac.il/economics/index.html (Accessed on 10 April 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsella J, Wilson S, Jong FD, et al (2000) Pluriactivity as a livelihood strategy in Irish farm households and its role in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis 40(4): 481–497. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-i-Gelats F, José Milán M, Bartolomé J (2011) Is farming enough in mountain areas? Farm diversification in the Pyrenees. Land Use Policy 28(4): 783–791. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low A (1986) Agricultural development in southern Africa: farm household economics and the food crisis. James Currey, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maye D, Ilbery B, Watts D (2009) Farm diversification, tenancy and CAP reform: Results from a survey of tenant farmers in England. Journal of Rural Studies 25: 333–342. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osenil G, Winters P (2009) Rural nonfarm activities and agricultural crop production in Nigeria. Agricultural Economics 40(2): 189–201. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00369.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt M (2009) An inter-generational comparison of pluriactivity from a gender perspective. Journal of the Austrian Society of Agricultural Economics 18(2): 119–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt M (2010) Agritourism-from additional income to livelihood strategy and rural development. The Open Social Science Journal 3: 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott R (1996) Stagnation without equity: patterns of growth and inequality in China’s rural economy. The China Journal 35: 63–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpleya R, Vass A (2006) Tourism, farming and diversification: An attitudinalstudy. Tourism Management 27(5): 1040–1052. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2005.10.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeulen V, Verspecht A, Van Huylenbroeck G, et al. (2006) The importance of the institutional environment on multifunctional farming systems, in the peri-urban area of Brussels. Land Use Policy 23(4): 486–501. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JC, Guo ZG (2001) Logistic regression model—methods and applications. Higher Education Press, Beijing. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang GC, Han SF (2005) An analysis on rural households pluriactivity: from the perspective of labor division. Chinese Rural Economy 8: 4–9. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu WX (1999) On Chinese rural households pluriactive operation. Agricultural Economy 6: 27–28. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, 610041, China

    Shao-quan Liu, Fang-ting Xie & Shi-li Guo

  2. Sichuan Research Institute of Tourism Planning, Chengdu, 610051, China

    Hai-qin Zhang

  3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Fang-ting Xie & Shi-li Guo

Authors
  1. Shao-quan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hai-qin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fang-ting Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shi-li Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shao-quan Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, Sq., Zhang, Hq., Xie, Ft. et al. Current situation and influencing factors of pluriactivity in mountainous and hilly rural areas of Sichuan province, China. J. Mt. Sci. 10, 445–454 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2415-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2415-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation