Skip to main content
Log in

Social business as a sustainable business model: making capitalism anti-fragile

  • Special Feature: Original Article
  • People, Technology and Governance for Sustainability: The Contribution of Systems and Cyber-systemic Thinking
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last two centuries, developed nations have had an unprecedented generation of wealth showing a strong economic progress. Unfortunately, such economic development has not been witnessed in all countries and it does not represent the holistic face of the social progress. The main reason stands in the ideological limitations of capitalism itself, often ignoring local communities and environment while focusing exclusively on profit maximization, market share, dividends and bonuses. This failure it is also because of the division between two basic entities: nonprofit and for profit sectors. The segregation created between the economic values and social values, has created a system where the two different entities have failed to capture and integrate the multi-dimensional nature of the human being to satisfy social needs. Because of this increasing tension, the society needs to find a common ground solution, where the social and economic benefits of these two entities are merged together to generate an anti-fragile system. This research is an attempt to determine if the social business (SB) is capable to solve the problems arose from the free market idealogy, nonprofit philosophy, and the consequent social and economic inefficiency. Thus, the boundaries between the private, public and nonprofit sectors need to be changed. In addition, it is aimed to show that SB can solve social, economic, and environmental problems by using the entrepreneurial engine and the profit instrument, proving at the end to be by default a sustainable business model that respects the triple bottom line approach. The investigation method is based on literature review and theory development from three different fields: economics, development studies, and nonprofit management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anheier HK (2006) Creative philanthropy toward a new philanthropy for the twenty-first century. Routledge, Oxon

    Google Scholar 

  • Anheimer HK, Salamon LM (2006) The nonprofit sector in comparative perspective. In: Powell WW, Steinberg R (eds) The nonprofit sector: a research handbook. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashoka (2000) Selecting leading social entrepreneurs. Ashoka innovators for the public. https://www.ashoka.org/. Accessed 7 July 2015

  • Austin S (2003) Social entrepreneurship and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both. Harvard Business School, Boston, pp 4–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballesteros-Sola M (2014) Social business planning: management and financial issues. In: Grove A, Berg GA (eds) Social business: theory, practice, and critical perspectives. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Barile S, Saviano M (2018) Complexity and sustainability in management: insights from a systems perspective. In: Barile S, Saviano M (eds) Social dynamics in a systems perspective. Springer, Cham, pp 39–63

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barile S, Saviano M, Polese F, Di Nauta P (2012) Reflections on service systems boundaries: a viable systems perspective: the case of the London Borough of Sutton. Eur Manag J 30(5):451–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barile S, Saviano M, Iandolo F, Calabrese M (2014) The viable systems approach and its contribution to the analysis of sustainable business behaviors. Syst Res Behav Sci 31(6):683–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton BH (2007) Business solutions for the global poor: creating social and economic value. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Becchetti L, Ciciretti R, Hasan I, Kobeissi N (2012) Corporate social responsibility and shareholder’s value. J Bus Res 65(11):1628–1635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruni L, Zamagni S (2007) Civil economy. Efficiency, equity, public happiness. Peter Lang, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh TB, Oza A, Bennett CJ (2005) The measure of success: evaluating corporate citizenship performance. The Conference Board, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (2004) Ideas for development reflecting forwards. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, pp 24–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark J, Driscoll W (2003) Globalization and the poor: exploitation or equalizer. The International Debate Education Association, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbetta P (1999) Metodologia e Tecniche Della Ricerca Sociale. Il Mulino, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordes JJ, Steuerle CEa (2009) Nonprofits and business. The Urban Institute Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Dees G (1998) Enterprising nonprofits. Harv Bus Rev 76:55–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Dees G (2007) Taking social entrepreneurship seriously. Society 44(3):24–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson A (2008) How much should a CEO make? Wisebread Small Business Resource Center. http://www.wisebread.com/how-much- money-should-a-CEO-make

  • Dragonetti G (1769) A treatise on virtues and rewards. Johnson and Payne, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Eade D, Rowlands J (2003) Development methods and approaches: critical reflections. Selected essays from development in practice. Oxfam, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1997) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone

  • Elkington J (2008) Forward. In: Epstein MJ (ed) Making sustainability work: best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts. Greenleaf Publishing, UK, pp 11–12

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2013) Social economy and social entrepreneurship. Social Europe guide, vol 4. European Union, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Foerster HV (2003) Understanding: essays on cybernetics and cognition. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Genovesi A (1769) Lezioni di commercio o sia d’Economia civile, vol 1. A Spese Remondini di Venezia, Venice

    Google Scholar 

  • Genovesi A (1820) Spirito delle leggi del Signore di Montesquieu, con le note dell’Abbate. Tomo Secondo, Domenico Terres Libraio, Napoli

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber D (2007) Army of altruists: on the alienated right to do good. Harper’s Magazine, pp 31–38

  • Grove A, Berg GA (eds) Social business: theory, practice, and critical perspectives. Springer, Berlin

  • Human Development Report (2013) Sustaining human progress: reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience. United Nations Development Program, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hysa Xh, Zerba E (2015) What capitalism can learn from innovation and social business? Towards the social capitalism. Lap Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken

    Google Scholar 

  • James A (2007) Students target poverty with socially responsible capitalism. Seattle Post Intelligencer. http://www.seattlepi.com/business/article/Students-target-poverty-with-socially-responsible-1229568.php

  • Johnson S (2003) Literature review on social entrepreneurship. Canadian Centre for Social Entrepreneurship, University of Alberta, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur A (1998) Poor but prosperous. Atlantic 282(3):40–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten D (1980) Community organization and rural development: a learning process approach. Public Adm Rev 40(5):480–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Light P (2008) The search for social entrepreneurship. Brookings Institution, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair J, Marti I (2006) Social entrepreneurship research: a source of explanation, prediction and delight. J World Bus 41(1):36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis C, Klaber A, Thomason B (2010) B Lab: building a new sector of the economy. Case study series 9-411-047. Harv Bus Rev 1–30

  • Massetti B (2008) The social entrepreneurship matrix as ‘Tipping Point’ for economic change. Emerg Complex Organ 10(3):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael P (2007) Development and social change: a global perspective. Pine Forge Press, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardone G (2009) Problem Soving Strategico da Tasca: l’arte di trovare soluzioni a problemi irrisolvibili. Ponte alle Grazie, Florence

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardone G, Watzlawick P (2005) Brief strategic therapy. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuys E (2006) Neo-liberal globalism and social sustainable globalization. Brill Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Noya A, Clarence E (eds) (2007) The social economy: building inclusive economies. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Said Business School (2009) The Skoll Centre for social entrepreneurship. http://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/skoll/

  • Pallotta D (2008) Uncharitable: how restraints on nonprofits undermine their potential. University Press of New England, Lebanon

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrini F (ed) (2006) The new social entrepreneurship: what awaits social entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton

    Google Scholar 

  • Riolli L, Hysa Xh, Marku Sh (2016) Reducing labor migration by increasing local employment and talent engagement through social businesses. J Sci High Educ Res 1(1):26–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins RH (2013) Global problems and the culture of capitalism, 6th edn. Pearson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosberg M (2005) Power of greed: collective action in international development. University of Alberta, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuer S (2000) Social and economic motivation at work: theory of work motivation reassessed. Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • School CB (2009) The research initiative on social entrepreneurship. RiseProject. http://riseproject.org/. Accessed 3 Aug 2015

  • Schumpeter J (1943) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciarelli F, Rinaldi A (2017) Development management of transforming economies: theories, approaches and models for overall development. Palgrave Macmillan, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sen AK (2000) Development as freedom. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanin T (1997) The idea of progress. In: Bawtree V, Rahnema M (eds) The post-development reader. Zed Books, London, pp 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simone C, Barile S, Calabrese M (2018) Managing territory and its complexity: a decision-making model based on the viable system approach (VsA). Land Use Policy 72:493–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skoll Foundation (2009) Connecting and celebrating social entrepreneurs. http://www.skollfoundation.org

  • Stiglitz J (2002) Globalization and its discontents. WW Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz J (2007) Making globalization work. WW Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb NN (2012) Antifragile: things that gain from disorder. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavignot BF (2016) Social business and base of the pyramid: levers for strategic renewal. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • The Rockefeller Foundation (2003) The 2003 annual report: expanding opportunity. https://assets.rockefellerfoundation.org/app/uploads/20150530121731/Annual-Report-2003.pdf

  • Tiessen R (2014) Gender equality and the “Two CIDAs”: successes and setbacks, 1976–2013. Rethinking Canadian Aid, pp 195–209

  • Transparency International (2013) Global Corruption Barometer. https://www.transparency.org/gcb2013/report

  • Vernon R (2001) The new Kerala model: lessons for sustainable development. World Dev 29(4):601–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal DJ (1999) Consumer expectations on the social accountability of business. Conference Board, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring M (1990) If women counted: a new feminist economics. Harper, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick P (ed) (1984) The invented reality: how do we know what we believe we know? (contributions to constructivism). Norton and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil D (2008) Economic growth. Addison Wesley, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus M (1999) Banker to the poor: micro-lending and the battle against world poverty. PublicAffairs, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus M (2007) Creating a world without poverty: social business and the future of capitalism. PublicAffairs, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus M (2010) Building social business: the new kind of capitalism that serves humanity’s most pressing needs. PublicAffairs, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus M (2017) A world of three zeros: the new economics of zero poverty, zero unemployment, and zero net carbon emissions. PublicAffairs, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus M, Moingeon B, Laurence LO (2010) Building social business models: lessons from the Grameen experience. Long Range Plan 43(2–3):308–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamagni S, Bruni L (eds) (2013) Handbook on the economics of philanthropy, reciprocity and social enterprise. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xhimi Hysa.

Additional information

Handled by Marialuisa Saviano, University of Salerno, Italy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hysa, X., Zerba, E., Calabrese, M. et al. Social business as a sustainable business model: making capitalism anti-fragile. Sustain Sci 13, 1345–1356 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0566-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0566-1

Keywords

Navigation