Skip to main content
Log in

Warum Chamäleons (manchmal) beruflich erfolgreich sind

How it comes that chameleons are (sometimes) successful in their careers

  • Hauptbeiträge
  • Published:
Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Wenn Personen ihr Verhalten strategisch dazu einsetzen, ein berufliches Ziel zu erreichen, dann werden sie fallweise als „sozial kompetent“, aber auch als „Blender“ oder „Chamäleons“ bezeichnet. Das Konstrukt „Self-Monitoring“ vereint diese Sichtweisen, es enthält Aspekte von soziale Fertigkeiten, von Impression Management und von inkonsistentem („chamäleonartigem“) Verhalten. Wir bilanzieren die Befunde zum Karriereerfolg von Individuen mit hohem Self-Monitoring. Sie sind insbesondere geschickt darin, positive Eindrücke zu generieren und schnelle Karriereerfolge zu realisieren. Andererseits haben sie eher Schwierigkeiten, stabile berufliche Beziehungen aufzubauen, erfahren nicht nur mehr Interesse, sondern auch häufiger Ablehnung durch andere Menschen und zeigen keine überdurchschnittlichen Leistungen. Schnelle Beförderungen, Wechsel des Arbeitsgebers oder die Kontrolle der sozialen Netzwerke durch die Einnahme von Schlüsselpositionen helfen ihnen aber dabei, Karriereerfolge zu erzielen.

Abstract

Individuals who strategically control their behavior to reach their professional goals may either be considered as persons with high social competence or, alternatively, as “dazzlers” or chameleons. Both of these perspectives are included in the construct of self-monitoring, as it focuses on social skills as well as on aspects of impression management and inconsistency (referring to the chameleon-like behavior). In this paper, we take stock of the findings on the career success of individuals characterized by high self-monitoring. It seems that they are particularly skilled in making a good impression on others and realizing career success (especially promotions). However, high self-monitors have also difficulties building stable relationships: Even though they attract more interest from others, they also experience rejection more often. All in all, the picture emerges that although high self-monitors do not perform above average, they do manage to reach career goals by obtaining promotions, switching between employers, controlling social networks, and holding key positions in organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. In diesem Beitrag zeichnen wir ein nur wenig positives Bild von Self-Monitoring. Immerhin zeigt sich: Wenn Personen wenig verträglich und gewissenhaft sind, sie aber eine hohe Ausprägung in Self-Monitoring haben, dann agieren sie weniger kontraproduktiv, solange sie unter sozialer Beobachtung sind (Oh et al. 2014).

Literatur

  • Barrick, M. R., Parks, L., & Mount, M. K. (2005). Self-monitoring as a moderator of the relationships between personality traits and performance. Personnel Psychology, 58, 745–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, T. N., & Truxillo, D. M. (2000). Temp-to-permanent employees: a longitudinal study of stress and selection success. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 337–364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhardwaj, A., Qureshi, I., Konrad, A. M., & Lee, S. (2016). A two-wave study of self-monitoring personality, social network churn, and in-degree centrality in close friendship and general socializing networks. Group & Organization Management, 41, 526–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blickle, G., Diekmann, C., Schneider, P. B., Kalthöfer, Y., & Summers, J. K. (2012). When modesty wins: impression management through modesty, political skill, and career success—a two-study investigation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 899–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, A. S., Ryan, A. M., Imus, A. L., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Temporary worker, permanent loser? A model of the stigmatization of temporary workers. Journal of Management, 33, 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, D. F., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1982). Boundary spanning and individual performance: the impact of self-monitoring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 124–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, D. V., Schleicher, D. J., Unckless, A. L., & Hiller, N. J. (2002). Self-monitoring personality at work: a meta-analytic investigation of construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 390–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diemand, A., & Schuler, H. (1998). Wirksamkeit von Selbstdarstellungsvariablen im Rahmen der prognostischen Validierung eines Potentialanalyseverfahrens. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 42, 134–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, R., Landis, B., Zhang, Z., Anderson, M. H., Shaw, J. D., & Kilduff, M. (2015). Integrating personality and social networks: a meta-analysis of personality, network position, and work outcomes in organizations. Organization Science, 26, 1243–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuglestad, P. T., & Snyder, M. (2010). Status and the motivational foundations of self-monitoring. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(11), 1031–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galais, N., & Moser, K. (2018). Temporary agency workers stepping into a permanent position: social skills matter. Employee Relations, 40, 124–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., & Snyder, M. (2000). Self-monitoring: appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 530–555.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graf, A. (2004). Eine deutschsprachige Version der Self-Monitoring-Skala. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 48, 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, C. A., Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2003). Influence tactics and work outcomes: a meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A. L., Reynold, J., & Marsden, P. V. (2003). Externalizing employment: flexible staffing arrangements in US organizations. Social Science Research, 32, 525–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M., & Day, D. V. (1994). Do chameleons get ahead? The effects of self-monitoring on managerial careers. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1047–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmer, F., & Ziegler, K. (2010). Brückenfunktion der Leiharbeit: Zumindest ein schmaler Steg. IAB-Kurzbericht, Bd. 13. Nürnberg: IAB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennox, R. D., & Wolfe, R. N. (1984). Revision of the self-monitoring scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1349–1364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leone, C., & Hawkins, L. B. (2006). Self-monitoring and close relationships. Journal of Personality, 74, 739–778.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (2001). The social networks of high and low self-monitors: implications for workplace performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 121–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. S., & Cardy, R. L. (2000). Self-monitoring and performance appraisal: rating outcomes in project teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 609–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, K., & Galais, N. (2007). Self-monitoring and job performance: the moderating effect of tenure. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 93–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, K., & Schuler, H. (2014). Leistungsbeurteilung. In H. Schuler & K. Moser (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch Organisationspsychologie (5. Aufl. S. 177–216). Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, K., Diemand, A., & Schuler, H. (1996). Inkonsistenz und soziale Fertigkeiten als zwei Komponenten von Self-Monitoring. Diagnostica, 42, 268–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2013). A meta‐analysis of the relationships of age and tenure with innovation‐related behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86, 585–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, I., Charlier, S. D., Mount, M. K., & Berry, C. M. (2014). The two faces of high self‐monitors: chameleonic moderating effects of self‐monitoring on the relationships between personality traits and counterproductive work behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 92–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasovova, Z., Mehra, A., Borgatti, S. P., & Schippers, M. C. (2010). Network churn: the effects of self-monitoring personality on brokerage dynamics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 639–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, W. (2014). Wie es euch gefällt. Stuttgart: Reclam. Erstveröffentlichung 1623

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sypher, B. D., & Sypher, H. E. (1983). Perception of communication ability. Self-monitoring in an organizational setting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnley, W. H., & Bolino, M. C. (2001). Achieving desired images while avoiding undesired images: exploring the role of self-monitoring in impression management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 351–360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Hu, Q., & Dong, B. (2015). Managing personal networks: an examination of how high self-monitors achieve better job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 91, 180–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmot, M. P., DeYoung, C. G., Stillwell, D., & Kosinski, M. (2016). Self‐monitoring and the metatraits. Journal of Personality, 84, 335–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, H.-G., & Moser, K. (2006). Entwicklung und Validierung einer Networkingskala. Diagnostica, 52, 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Moser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moser, K., Galais, N. Warum Chamäleons (manchmal) beruflich erfolgreich sind. Gr Interakt Org 49, 42–49 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-018-0399-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-018-0399-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation