Skip to main content
Log in

Developing Measures of Educational Change for Academic Health Care Teams Implementing the Chronic Care Model in Teaching Practices

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Chronic Care Model (CCM) is a multidimensional framework designed to improve care for patients with chronic health conditions. The model strives for productive interactions between informed, activated patients and proactive practice teams, resulting in better clinical outcomes and greater satisfaction. While measures for improving care may be clear, measures of residents’ competency to provide chronic care do not exist. This report describes the process used to develop educational measures and results from CCM settings that used them to monitor curricular innovations.

SUBJECTS

Twenty-six academic health care teams participating in the national and California Academic Chronic Care Collaboratives.

METHOD

Using successive discussion groups and surveys, participants engaged in an iterative process to identify desirable and feasible educational measures for curricula that addressed educational objectives linked to the CCM. The measures were designed to facilitate residency programs’ abilities to address new accreditation requirements and tested with teams actively engaged in redesigning educational programs.

ANALYSIS

Field notes from each discussion and lists from work groups were synthesized using the CCM framework. Descriptive statistics were used to report survey results and measurement performance.

RESULTS

Work groups generated educational objectives and 17 associated measurements. Seventeen (65%) teams provided feasibility and desirability ratings for the 17 measures. Two process measures were selected for use by all teams. Teams reported variable success using the measures. Several teams reported use of additional measures, suggesting more extensive curricular change.

CONCLUSION

Using an iterative process in collaboration with program participants, we successfully defined a set of feasible and desirable education measures for academic health care teams using the CCM. These were used variably to measure the results of curricular changes, while simultaneously addressing requirements for residency accreditation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bodenheimer T, Chen E, Bennett H. Confronting the growing burden of chronic disease: can the US health care workforce do the job? Health Affairs. 2009;28:64–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the twenty-first century. Washington: National Academy Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA. 2002;288:1775–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, part 2. JAMA. 2002;288:1909–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Warm EJ, Schauer DP, Diers T, et al. The ambulatory long-block: An Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Educational Innovations Project (EIP). J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:921–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dipiero A, Dorr DA, Kelso C, Bowen JL. Integrating systematic chronic care for diabetes into an academic general internal medicine resident-faculty practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:1749–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Affairs. 2001;20:64–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. ACGME Outcome Project. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/outcome/comp/compMin.asp, accessed March 23, 2010.

  9. Langley GL, Nolan KM, Nolan TW, Norman CL, Provost LP. The improvement guide: a practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bonomi AE, Wagner EH, Glasgow RE, Von Korff M. Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC): a practical tool to measure quality improvement. Health Serv Res. 2002;37:791–820.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lorig KR, Ritter P, Stewart AL, et al. Chronic disease self-management program: two-year health status and health care utilization outcomes. Med Care. 2001;39:1217–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Duffy FD, Fortna GS. The mini-CEX: a method for assessing clinical skills. Ann Int Med. 2003;138:476–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the California Healthcare Foundation generously supported the academic chronic care collaboratives that served as the basis for this work

Conflict of interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judith L. Bowen MD.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 32 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bowen, J.L., Stevens, D.P., Sixta, C.S. et al. Developing Measures of Educational Change for Academic Health Care Teams Implementing the Chronic Care Model in Teaching Practices. J GEN INTERN MED 25 (Suppl 4), 586–592 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1358-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1358-1

KEY WORDS

Navigation