Abstract
Aim
The purpose of our study was to establish the prevalence and pathological nature of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) prostate incidental uptake (PIU) among patients studied for non-prostate-malignant purposes in three nuclear medicine centres.
Methods
We retrospectively evaluated 20,422 scans performed on male patients; all patients underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT for purposes not related to prostate disease.
Results
Among 20,422 patients PIU was identified for 280 (1.4 %) with an average age of 70 ± 10.7 years. Sixty-three of the 280 patients with PIU (22.5 %) underwent PSA dosage and biopsy to determine the nature of the incidental uptake. Thirty-five of the 63 (55.5 %) PIU were malignant whereas 28/63 (44.5 %) were benign. The average value of PSA for patients with benign PIU was 3.7 ± 2.8 ng/ml whereas it was 7.8 ± 8.2 ng/ml in patients with malignant PIU; this difference was statistically significant. For malignant lesions, the average lesion-to-liver SUVmax ratio was 2.9 ± 2.5 and the average lesion-to-blood-pool SUVmax ratio was 3.7 ± 2.5. For benign lesions, the average lesion-to-liver SUVmax ratio was 2.5 ± 1.7 and the average lesion-to-blood-pool SUVmax ratio was 3.5 ± 2.4; there was no statistically significant difference between lesion-to-liver and lesion-to-blood-pool SUVmax ratios for benign and malignant lesions.
Conclusion
Because PIU values are indicative of malignancy for a substantial percentage of patients, further investigation is required.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, et al (2013) GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). http://globocan.iarc.fr. Accessed 13 January 2015.
Bertagna F, Sadeghi R, Giovanella L, Treglia G. Incidental uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in the prostate gland. Systematic review and meta-analysis on prevalence and risk of malignancy. Nuklearmedizin. 2014;53:249–58.
Bertagna F, Treglia G, Piccardo A, Giovannini E, Bosio G, Biasiotto G, et al. FDG-PET/CT thyroid incidentalomas: a wide retrospective analysis in three Italian centres on the significance of focal uptake and SUV value. Endocrine. 2013;43:678–85.
Bertagna F, Treglia G, Piccardo A, Giubbini R. Diagnostic and clinical significance of F-18-FDG-PET/CT thyroid incidentalomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:3866–75.
Bertagna F, Treglia G, Orlando E, Dognini L, Giovanella L, Sadeghi R, et al. Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental 18F-FDG breast uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jpn J Radiol. 2014;32:59–68.
Bertagna F, Evangelista L, Piccardo A, Bertoli M, Bosio G, Giubbini R, Orlando E, Treglia G. Multicentric study on 18F-FDG-PET/CT breast incidental uptake in patients studied for non-breast malignant purposes. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.remn.2014.08.003.
Gill RS, Perry T, Abele JT, Bédard EL, Schiller D. The clinical significance of incidental intra-abdominal findings on positron emission tomography performed to investigate pulmonary nodules. World J Surg Oncol. 2012;10:25.
Treglia G, Calcagni ML, Rufini V, Leccisotti L, Meduri GM, Spitilli MG, et al. Clinical significance of incidental focal colorectal (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: our experience and a review of the literature. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:174–80.
Hyun SH, Choi JY, Lee KH, Choe YS, Kim BT. Incidental focal 18F-FDG uptake in the pituitary gland: clinical significance and differential diagnostic criteria. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:547–50.
Treglia G, Bertagna F, Sadeghi R, Muoio B, Giovanella L. Prevalence and risk of malignancy of focal incidental uptake detected by fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the parotid gland: a meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014. doi:10.1007/s00405-014-3308-8.
Bhosale P, Balachandran A, Vikram R, et al. what is the clinical significance of FDG unexpected uptake in the prostate in patients undergoing PET/CT for other malignancies? Int J Mol Imaging. 2013;2013:476786.
Cho SK, Choi JY, Yoo J, et al. Incidental focal 18F-FDG uptake in the prostate: clinical significance and differential diagnostic criteria. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;45:192–6.
Han EJ, HO J, Choi WH, et al. Significance of incidental focal uptake in prostate on 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography CT images. Br J Radiol. 2010;83:915–20.
Hwang I, Chong A, Jung SI, et al. Is further evaluation needed for incidental focal uptake in the prostate in 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography images? Ann Nucl Med. 2013;27:140–5.
Ozkol V, Alper E, Aydin N, et al. The clinical value of incidental 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-avid foci detected on positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Nucl Med Commun. 2010;31:128–36.
Seino H, Ono S, Miura H, et al. Incidental prostate 18F-FDG uptake without calcification indicates the possibility of prostate cancer. Oncol Rep. 2014;31:1517–22.
Yang Z, Hu S, Cheng J, et al. Prevalence and risk of cancer of incidental uptake in prostate identified by fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Clin Imaging. 2014;38:470–4.
Kang PM, Seo WI, Lee SS, et al. Incidental abnormal FDG uptake in the prostate on 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:8699–703.
Godoy A, Ulloa V, Rodriguez F, et al. Differential subcellular distribution of glucose transporters GLUT1-6 and GLUT9 in human cancer: ultrastructural localization of GLUT1 and GLUT5 in breast tumor tissues. J Cell Physiol. 2006;207:614–27.
Levi J, Cheng Z, Gheysens O, et al. Fluorescent fructose derivatives for imaging breast cancer cells. Bioconjug Chem. 2007;18:628–34.
Reinicke K, Sotomayor P, Cisterna P, et al. Cellular distribution of Glut-1 and Glut-5 in benign and malignant human prostate tissue. J Cell Biochem. 2012;113:553–62.
Minamimoto R, Uemura H, Sano F, et al. The potential of FDG-PET/CT for detecting prostate cancer in patients with an elevated serum PSA level. Ann Nucl Med. 2011;25:21–7.
Hofer C, Laubenbacher C, Block T, et al. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is useless for the detection of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 1999;1999(36):31–5.
Shiiba M, Ishihara K, Kimura G, et al. Evaluation of primary prostate cancer using 11C-methionine-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Ann Nucl Med. 2012;2012(26):138–45.
Effert P, Beniers AJ, Tamimi Y, et al. Expression of glucose transporter 1 (Glut-1) in cell lines and clinical specimens from human prostate adenocarcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2004;24:3057–63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
Bertagna, F., Piccardo, A., Dib, B. et al. Multicentre study of 18F-FDG-PET/CT prostate incidental uptake. Jpn J Radiol 33, 538–546 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-015-0453-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-015-0453-y