Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Combination of elastography and tissue quantification using the acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology for differential diagnosis of breast masses

  • Original article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We evaluated the diagnostic performance of elastography and tissue quantification using acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology for differential diagnosis of breast masses.

Materials and methods

There were 161 mass lesions. First, lesion correspondence on ARFI elastographic images to those on the B-mode images was evaluated: no findings on ARFI images (pattern 1), lesions that were bright inside (pattern 2), lesions that were dark inside (pattern 4), lesions that contained both bright and dark areas (pattern 3). In addition, pattern 4 was subdivided into 4a (dark area same as B-mode lesion) and 4b (dark area larger than lesion). Next, shear wave velocity (SWV) was measured using virtual touch tissue quantification.

Results

There were 13 pattern 1 lesions and five pattern 2 lesions; all of these lesions were benign, whereas all pattern 4b lesions (n = 43) were malignant. When the value of 3.59 m/s was chosen as the cutoff value, the combination of elastography and tissue quantification showed 91 % (83–91) sensitivity, 93 % (65–70) specificity, and 92 % (148–161) accuracy.

Conclusion

The combination of elastography and tissue quantification is thought to be a promising ultrasound technique for differential diagnosis of breast-mass lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology. 1995;196(1):123–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zonderland HM, Coerkamp EG, Hermans J, van de Vijver MJ, van Voorthuisen AE. Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography. Radiology. 1999;213(2):413–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Flobbe K, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, Beets GL, von Meyenfeldt MF, van Engelshoven JM. The role of ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammography in the detection of breast cancer. A systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2002;38(8):1044–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2006;239(2):341–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tardivon A, El Khoury C, Thibault F, Wyler A, Barreau B, Neuenschwander S. Elastography of the breast: a prospective study of 122 lesions. J Radiol. 2007;88(5):657–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wojcinski S, Farrokh A, Weber S, Thomas A, Fischer T, Slowinski T, et al. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography. Ultraschall Med. 2010;31(5):484–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Raza S, Odulate A, Ong EM, Chikarmane S, Harston CW. Using real-time tissue elastography for breast lesion evaluation: our initial experience. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29(4):551–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoon JH, Kim MH, Kim EK, Moon HJ, Kwak JY, Kim MJ. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography: how it affects the diagnosis of breast lesions. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(3):730–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Meng W, Zhang G, Wu C, Wu G, Song Y, Lu Z. Preliminary results of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) ultrasound imaging of breast lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37(9):1436–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tozaki M, Isobe S, Yamaguchi M, Ogawa Y, Homma K, Saito M, et al. Ultrasonographic elastography of the breast using acoustic radiation force impulse technology: preliminary study. Jpn J Radiol. 2011;29(6):452–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tozaki M, Isobe S, Fukuma E. Preliminary study of ultrasonographic tissue quantification of the breast using the acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80(2):e182–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nightingale K, Soo MS, Nightingale R, Trahey G. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: in vivo demonstration of clinical feasibility. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002;28(2):227–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhai L, Palmeri ML, Bouchard RR, Nightingale RW, Nightingale KR. An integrated indenter-ARFI imaging system for tissue stiffness quantification. Ultrason Imaging. 2008;30(2):95–111.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR BI-RADS-mammography, 4th edn. In: ACR breast imaging reporting and data system. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.

  15. American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR BI-RADS-US, 1st ed. In: ACR Breast imaging reporting and data system. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003.

  16. Abdullah N, Mesurolle B, El-Khoury M, Kao E. Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses. Radiology. 2009;252(3):665–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Japanese Breast Cancer Society. General rules for clinical and pathological recording of breast cancer. 15th ed. Tokyo: Japanese Breast Cancer Society; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Garra BS, Cespedes EI, Ophir J, Spratt SR, Zuurbier RA, Magnant CM, et al. Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. Radiology. 1997;202(1):79–86.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tozaki M, Saito M, Joo C, Yamaguchi M, Isobe S, Ogawa Y, et al. Ultrasonographic tissue quantification of the breast using acoustic radiation force impulse technology: phantom study and clinical application. Jpn J Radiol. 2011;29(8):598–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim EK, Ko KH, Oh KK, Kwak JY, You JK, Kim MJ, et al. Clinical application of the BI-RADS final assessment to breast sonography in conjunction with mammography. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(5):1209–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Costantini M, Belli P, Lombardi R, Franceschini G, Mulè A, Bonomo L. Characterization of solid breast masses: use of the sonographic breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25(5):649–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Heinig J, Witteler R, Schmitz R, Kiesel L, Steinhard J. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32(4):573–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Raza S, Chikarmane SA, Neilsen SS, Zorn LM, Birdwell RL. BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions: value of US in management–follow-up and outcome. Radiology. 2008;248(3):773–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by Masahiro Saito, Yoshihiko Nomi and Chanwoong Joo (Mochida Siemens Medical Systems Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan), and we greatly appreciate their help.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Breast Center, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, Chiba, 296-8602, Japan

    Mitsuhiro Tozaki & Masaaki Sakamoto

  2. Division of Ultrasonographic Examination, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan

    Sachiko Isobe

Authors
  1. Mitsuhiro Tozaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sachiko Isobe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Masaaki Sakamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsuhiro Tozaki.

About this article

Cite this article

Tozaki, M., Isobe, S. & Sakamoto, M. Combination of elastography and tissue quantification using the acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology for differential diagnosis of breast masses. Jpn J Radiol 30, 659–670 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-012-0106-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-012-0106-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation