Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to evaluate the imaging findings of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) compared to those of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC).
Materials and methods
The study included ILCs (n = 27) and IDCs (n = 85). Imaging findings were retrospectively evaluated, according to the BI-RADS lexicon. We compared the imaging findings, multiplicity, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detection accuracy of ILC with those of IDC.
Results
At mammography, normal findings and mass lesions were more frequent with ILCs (14.8% and 59.2%, respectively) than with IDCs (1.2% and 44.7%, respectively) (P = 0.009). With ultrasonography (US), posterior acoustic shadowing was more frequently seen in ILCs (59.2%) than in IDCs (15.8%) (P < 0.001). With MRI, both ILCs and IDCs most commonly appeared as a heterogeneously enhancing, irregular mass with a spiculated border. Multifocality was more frequently associated with ILCs (40.7%) than with IDCs (14.1% 1% 0.002). However, multicentricity and bilaterality were not different between the two groups. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for the detection of multiplicity were 91.6% and 73.3%, respectively, for ILCs and 83.3% and 80.3%, respectively, for IDCs.
Conclusion
Normal findings, mass lesions on mammography, and posterior acoustic shadowing on US were more frequently associated with ILCs than with IDCs. Multifocality was more prevalent with ILCs than with IDCs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mann RM, Hoogeveen YL, Blickman JG, Boetes C. MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008;107:1–14.
Biglia N, Mariani L, Sgro L, Mininanni P, Moggio G, Sismondi P. Increased incidence of lobular breast cancer in women treated with hormone replacement therapy: implications for diagnosis, surgical and medical treatment. Endocr Relat Cancer 2007;14:549–567.
Li CI, Anderson BO, Daling JR, Moe RE. Trends in incidence rates of invasive lobular and ductal breast carcinoma. Jama 2003;289:1421–1424.
Lopez JK, Bassett LW. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: spectrum of mammographic, us, and mr imaging findings. Radiographics 2009;29:165–176.
Mameri CS, Kemp C, Goldman SM, Sobral LA, Ajzen S. Impact of breast mri on surgical treatment, axillary approach, and systemic therapy for breast cancer. Breast J 2008;14:236–244.
Liberman L, Morris EA, Kim CM, Kaplan JB, Abramson AF, Menell JH, et al. Mr imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:333–341.
Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK. Mr imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:901–910.
Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJ, Kaplan JB, LaTrenta LR, Menell JH, et al. Breast lesions detected on mr imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:171–178.
Brem RF, Ioffe M, Rapelyea JA, Yost KG, Weigert JM, Bertrand ML, et al. Invasive lobular carcinoma: detection with mammography, sonography, mri, and breast-specific gamma imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:379–383.
Krecke KN, Gisvold JJ. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic findings and extent of disease at diagnosis in 184 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;161:957–960.
Butler RS, Venta LA, Wiley EL, Ellis RL, Dempsey PJ, Rubin E. Sonographic evaluation of infiltrating lobular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:325–330.
Paramagul CP, Helvie MA, Adler DD. Invasive lobular carcinoma: sonographic appearance and role of sonography in improving diagnostic sensitivity. Radiology 1995;195:231–234.
Helvie MA, Paramagul C, Oberman HA, Adler DD. Invasive lobular carcinoma: imaging features and clinical detection. Invest Radiol 1993;28:202–207.
Sickles EA. The subtle and atypical mammographic features of invasive lobular carcinoma. Radiology 1991;178:25–26.
Evans WP, Warren Burhenne LJ, Laurie L, O’shaughnessy KF, Castellino RA. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic characteristics and computer-aided detection. Radiology 2002;225:182–189.
Pointon KS, Cunningham DA. Ultrasound findings in pure invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: comparison with matched cases of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Breast 1999;8:188–190.
Skaane P, Skjorten F. Ultrasonographic evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma. Acta Radiol 1999;40:369–375.
Chapellier C, Balu-Maestro C, Bleuse A, Ettore F, Bruneton JN. Ultrasonography of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: sonographic patterns and diagnostic value—report of 102 cases. Clin Imaging 2000;24:333–336.
Selinko VL, Middleton LP, Dempsey PJ. Role of sonography in diagnosing and staging invasive lobular carcinoma. J Clin Ultrasound 2004;32:323–332.
Caramella T, Chapellier C, Ettore F, Raoust I, Chamorey E, Balu-Maestro C. Value of mri in the surgical planning of invasive lobular breast carcinoma: a prospective and a retrospective study of 57 cases—comparison with physical examination, conventional imaging, and histology. Clin Imaging 2007;31:155–161.
Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E, Verslegers I, Biltjes I, Leyman P, et al. Preoperative breast mri in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1209–1216.
Weinstein SP, Orel SG, Heller R, Reynolds C, Czerniecki B, Solin LJ, et al. Mr imaging of the breast in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:399–406.
Trecate G, Tess JD, Vergnaghi D, Bergonzi S, Mariani G, Ferraris C, et al. Lobular breast cancer: how useful is breast magnetic resonance imaging? Tumori 2001;87:232–238.
Dixon JM, Anderson TJ, Page DL, Lee D, Duffy SW, Stewart HJ. Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: an evaluation of the incidence and consequence of bilateral disease. Br J Surg 1983;70:513–516.
Lesser ML, Rosen PP, Kinne DW. Multicentricity and bilaterality in invasive breast carcinoma. Surgery 1982;91:234–240.
Gump FE, Shikora S, Habif DV, Kister S, Logerfo P, Estabrook A. The extent and distribution of cancer in breasts with palpable primary tumors. Ann Surg 1986;204:384–390.
Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P, Bazzocchi M, Fausto A, Simonetti G, et al. Sensitivity of mri versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:1149–1157.
Boetes C, Veltman J, van Die L, Bult P, Wobbes T, Barentsz JO. The role of mri in invasive lobular carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004;86:31–37.
Francis A, England DW, Rowlands DC, Wadley M, Walker C, Bradley SA. The diagnosis of invasive lobular breast carcinoma: does mri have a role? Breast 2001;10:38–40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, S.H., Cha, E.S., Park, C.S. et al. Imaging features of invasive lobular carcinoma: comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma. Jpn J Radiol 29, 475–482 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-011-0584-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-011-0584-8