Skip to main content
Log in

Brittleness index analysis of coal samples

  • Research Article - Applied Geophysics
  • Published:
Acta Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The brittleness index (BI), which serves as a key reference for reservoir fracturing, is also an important quantitative index for the evaluation of coal-bed methane (CBM) reservoirs. To address the lack of research regarding this application of the BI, we measured the ultrasonic wave velocity of 10 coal samples collected from the Qinshui Basin, China. We then calculated the BI in three test directions, i.e., BI(90°), BI(45°), and BI(0°), as well as the BI anisotropy value (ABI) using the dynamic elastic method. Analysis of the calculated results showed that BI(90°) generally had the highest values and that BI(45°) was close to BI(0°). The ABI showed a positive correlation with the dynamic Young’s modulus anisotropy value, dynamic Poisson’s ratio anisotropy value, S-wave velocity anisotropy value, and the ratio of P-wave and S-wave velocity anisotropy values. However, the ABI had an unclear correlation with the P-wave velocity anisotropy value. Further analysis of the correlation between the BI and two other reservoir parameters (coal structure type and fracture development) revealed that samples with high BI values generally corresponded to primary or fragmented types of coal and also had low Poisson’s ratios, which indicates undeveloped fractures, while samples with low BI values corresponded to granulated types of coal and had high Poisson’s ratios, which indicates developed fractures. We investigated these correlations in order to understand the multiparameter constraints and their combined application in brittleness evaluations, which could reduce risk and improve the precision of ideal brittleness identification in CBM reservoirs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altindag R (2003) Correlation of specific energy with rock brittleness concepts on rock cutting. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 103(3):163–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Xiao X (2013) Mineral composition and brittleness of three sets of Paleozoic organic-rich shales in China South area. J China Coal Soc 38(5):822–826

    Google Scholar 

  • Copur H, Bilgin N, Tuncdemir H, Balci C (2003) A set of indices based on indentation tests for assessment of rock cutting performance and rock properties. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 103(9):589–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Diao H (2013) Rock mechanical properties and brittleness evaluation of shale reservoir. Acta Petrol Sin 29(9):3300–3306

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong S, Tao W (2008) Test on elastic anisotropic coefficients of gas coal. Chin J Geophys 51(3):671–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong S, Wu H, Li D, Huang Y (2016) Experimental study of ultrasonic velocity and anisotropy in coal samples. J Seism Explor 25(2):131–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu X, Qin Y, Wei Z (2007) Coal-bed methane geology. China University of Mining and Technology Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo Z, Li X, Liu C, Feng X, Ye S (2013) A shale rock physics model for analysis of brittleness index, mineralogy and porosity in the Barnett Shale. J Geophys Eng 10(2):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honda H, Sanada Y (1956) Hardness of coal. Fuel 35:451

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang X, Huang J, Li Z, Yang Q, Sun Q, Cui W (2015) Brittleness index and seismic rock physics model for anisotropic tight-oil sandstone reservoirs. Appl Geophys 12(1):11–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hucka V, Das B (1974) Brittleness determination of rocks by different methods. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 11(10):389–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Xi D, Ge N, Wang B, Kern H, Popp T (2002) Anisotropy of Poisson’s ratio in Rock Samples at Different Confining Pressures. Chin J Geophys 45(6):880–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morcote A, Mavko G, Prasad M (2010) Dynamic elastic properties of coal. Geophysics 75(6):E227–E234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng S, Gao Y, Yang R, Chen H, Chen X (2005) Theory of application of AVO for detection of coalbed methane - A case from the Huainan coalfield. Chin J Geophys 48(6):1475–1486

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng S, Chen H, Yang R, Gao Y, Chen X (2006) Factors facilitating or limiting the use of AVO for coal-bed methane. Geophysics 71(4):C49–C56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian K, He Z, Chen Y, Liu X, Li X (2017) Prediction of brittleness based on anisotropic rock physics model for kerogen-rich shale. Appl Geophys 14(4):463–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn J, Quinn G (1997) Indentation brittleness of ceramics: a fresh approach. J Mater Sci 32(16):4331–4346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos A (1997) 3-D AVO analysis and modeling applied to fracture detection in coalbed methane reservoirs. Geophysics 62(6):1683–1695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickman R, Mullen M, Petre J, Grieser B, Kundert D (2008) A practical use of shale petrophysics for stimulation design optimization: all shale plays are not clones of the barnett shale. SPE Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers: 115258

  • Ulusay R (2015) The ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 2007–2014. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Xu X (2012) Characteristics of P-wave and S-wave velocities and their relationships with density of six metamorphic kinds of coals. Chin J Geophys 55(11):3754–3761

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu H, Dong S, Li D, Huang P, Qi X (2015) Experimental study on dynamic elastic parameters of coal samples. Int J Min Sci Technol 25(3):447–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu G, Vozoff K, Durney D (1991) Effects of confining pressure and water saturation on ultrasonic compressional wave velocities in coals. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 28(6):515–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu G, Vozoff K, Durney D (1993) The influence of confining pressure and water saturation on dynamic elastic properties of some Permian coals. Geophysics 58(1):30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan J, Deng J, Zhang D, Li D, Yan W, Chen C, Cheng L, Chen Z (2013) Fracability evaluation of shale-gas reservoirs. Acta Petrol Sin 34(3):523–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou F (2012) Experiment of influence of fractures on coal/rock acoustic velocities: with carboniferous seams of Qinshui basin as example. Coal Geol Explor 40(2):71–74

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Anhui Key Research and Development Program (Grant No. 1804a0802203), the Natural Science Foundation of the Anhui Higher Education Institutions (Grant Nos. KJ2018A0071, KJ2016A192), and the Natural Science Foundation for Young Teachers in AUST (Grant No. QN2017202) for supporting this study. We also thank Li Donghui and Xue Haifei for their help with the coal sample testing. Finally, many thanks are due to the anonymous reviewers and the editor for their valuable suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haibo Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, H., Zhang, P., Dong, S. et al. Brittleness index analysis of coal samples. Acta Geophys. 67, 789–797 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-019-00291-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-019-00291-5

Keywords

Navigation