Skip to main content
Log in

The consumption-based determinants of the term structure of discount rates

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematics and Financial Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rate of return of a zero-coupon bond with maturity T is determined by our expectations about the mean (+), variance (-) and skewness (+) of the growth of aggregate consumption between 0 and T. The shape of the yield curve is thus determined by how these moments vary with T. We first examine growth processes in which a higher past economic growth yields a first-degree dominant shift in the distribution of the future economic growth, as assumed for example by Vasicek (J. Financ. Econ. 5, 177–188, 1977). We show that when the growth process exhibits such a positive serial dependence, then the yield curve is decreasing if the representative agent is prudent (\(u^{\prime \prime \prime } > 0\)), because of the increased risk that it yields for the distant future. A similar definition is proposed for the concept of second-degree stochastic dependence, as observed for example in the Cox–Ingersoll–Ross model, with the opposite comparative static property holding under temperance (\(u^{\prime \prime \prime \prime } < 0\)), because the change in downside risk (or skweness) that it generates. Finally, using these theoretical results, we propose two arguments in favor of using a smaller rate to discount cash-flows with very large maturities, as those associated to global warming or nuclear waste management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arrow, K.J., Cline, W.R., Maler, K.-G., Munasinghe, M., Squitieri, R., Stiglitz, J.E.: Intertemporal equity, discounting and economic efficiency. In: Bruce, J.P., Lee, H., Haites, E.F. (eds.) Climate Change 1995—Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (1996)

  2. Backus, D., Foresi, S., Telmer, C.: Discrete-time models of bond pricing, NBER Working Paper 6736 (1998)

  3. Barsky R.B. (1989). Why don’t the prices of stocks and bonds move together?. Am. Econ. Rev. 79: 1132–1145

    Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell (1986). Bond and stock returns in a simple exchange model. Q. J. Econ. 101: 785–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cochrane J.H. (1988). How big is the random walk in GNP?. J. Polit. Econ. 96: 893–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cochrane, J.: Asset Pricing. Princeton University Press (2001)

  7. Cogley T. (1990). International evidence on the size of the random walk in output. J. Polit. Econ. 98: 501–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cox J., Ingersoll J., Ross S. (1985). A theory of the term structure of interest rates. Econometrica 53: 385–403

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Cox J., Ingersoll J., Ross S. (1985). An intertemporal general equilibrium model of asset prices. Econometrica 53: 363–384

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Breeden D.T. (1986). Consumption, production, inflation and interest rates: a synthesis. J. Financ. Econ. 16: 3–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. DeLong, B.J.: Chapter 5: the reality of economic growth: history and prospect. http://www.j-bradford-delong.net (2004)

  12. Eeckhoudt L., Gollier C., Schneider T. (1995). Risk aversion, prudence and temperance: a unified approach. Econ. Lett. 48: 331–336

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Estrella A., Hardouvelis G.A. (1991). The term structure as a predictor of real economic activity. J. Financ. 46: 555–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Geiss C., Menezes C., Tressler J. (1980). Increasing downside risk. Am. Econ. Rev. 70(5): 921–931

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gollier C. (2002). Discounting an uncertain future. J. Public Econ. 85: 149–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gollier C. (2002). Time horizon and the discount rate. J. Econ. Theory 107: 463–473

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Gollier C., Pratt J.W. (1996). Risk vulnerability and the tempering effect of background risk. Econometrica 64: 1109–1124

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Groom, B., Koundouri, P., Panopoulou, E., Pantelidis, T.: Model selection for estimating certainty equivalent discount, mimeo, UCL, London (2004)

  19. Hansen L., Singleton K. (1983). Stochastic consumption, risk aversion and the temporal behavior of assets returns. J. Polit. Econ. 91: 249–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Joe, H.: Multivariate models and dependence concepts. Chapman and Hall/CRC (1997)

  21. Kimball M.S. (1990). Precautionary savings in the small and in the large. Econometrica 58: 53–73

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Kocherlakota N.R. (1996). The equity premium: it’s still a puzzle. J. Econ. Lit. 34: 42–71

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lehmann E.L. (1966). Some concepts of dependence. Ann. Math. Statist. 37: 1137–1153

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Leland H. (1968). Savings and uncertainty: the precautionary demand for savings. Q. J. Econ. 45: 621–36

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lucas R. (1978). Asset prices in an exchange economy. Econometrica 46: 1429–1446

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Maddison, A.: Phases of Economic Development. Oxford Economic Press (1991)

  27. Mankiw G. (1981). The permanent income hypothesis and the real interest rate. Econ. Lett. 7: 307–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Milgrom P. (1981). Good news and bad news: representation theorems and applications. Bell J. Econ. 12: 380–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Newell R., Pizer W. (2003). Discounting the benefits of climate change mitigation: How much uncertain rates increase valuations?. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 46(1): 52–71

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Piazzesi, M.: Affine term structure models. In: Ait-Sahalia, Y., Hansen, L.P. (eds) Handbook of Financial Econometrics. Elsevier (2005)

  31. Portney, P.R., Weynant, J.P. (eds.) Discounting and intergenerational equity. Resources for the future, Washington, D.C. (1999)

  32. Rothschild M., Stiglitz J. (1970). Increasing risk: I. A definition. J. Econ. Theory 2: 225–243

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Shaked, M., Shanthikumar, J.G.: Stochastic orders. Springer series in statistics (2007)

  34. Tchen A.H. (1980). Inequalities for distributions with given marginals. Ann. Probab. 8: 814–827

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Vasicek O. (1977). An equilibrium characterization of the term structure. J. Financ. Econ. 5: 177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Weitzman M.L. (1998). Why the far-distant future should be discounted at its lowest possible rate?. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 36: 201–208

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Weitzman M.L. (2001). Gamma discounting. Am. Econ. Rev. 91: 260–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Weitzman, M.L.: Statistical discounting of an uncertain distant future. Harvard University, mimeo (2004)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Gollier.

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper was entitled “Transitory shocks to GNP and the consumption-based term structure of interest rates”. I am indebted to John Campbell, Martin Weitzman and to two referees for helpful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gollier, C. The consumption-based determinants of the term structure of discount rates. Math Finan Econ 1, 81–101 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-007-0004-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-007-0004-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation