Skip to main content
Log in

Detecting and explaining systemic risks of mortgage banks—evidence from the subprime crisis

  • ZfB-SPECIAL ISSUE 1/2012
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent history, financial markets worldwide experienced severe turmoil due to the subprime crisis originating from the practice of US mortgage banks to securitize loans given especially to subprime borrowers. In the same crisis, several distressed banks were bailed out by states with even more banks receiving financial aids from governments. Using a unique data sample of 100 announcements of US mortgage banks between 2006 and 2009, this paper provides empirical evidence that isolated failures of US mortgage banks caused significant contagion effects in the US financial system. Conversely, especially the bailouts of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac led to significant positive valuation effects at rival banks. In the cross-sectional analyses, contrary to previous studies in the literature on past financial crises, we find evidence for pure contagion effects following the failures of US mortgage banks. Furthermore, we analyze the reactions of the CDS spreads of several large US banks to the announcements of mortgage banks using a novel mixture copula model. The results show that the contagion effects were limited to the stock market thus underlining the notion of an irrational response of (stock) market participants. The results from our cross-sectional and CDS data analyses in turn indicate that several of the failures of US mortgage banks during the subprime crisis caused irrational contagion in the US financial system thus justifying government intervention. Finally, we rule out the possibility that the contagion effects limited to the US stock market were caused by a herding of investors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Aharony J, Swary I (1983) Contagion effects of bank failures: evidence from capital markets. J Bus 56:305–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akhigbe A, Madura J (2001) Why do contagion effects vary among bank failures? J Bank Financ 25:657–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen F, Gale D (2000) Financial contagion. J Polit Econ 108:1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae K, Karolyi G, Stulz R (2003) A new approach to measuring financial contagion. Rev Financ Stud 16:717–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessler W, Nohel T (2000) Asymmetric information, dividend reductions, and contagion effects in bank stock returns. J Bank Financ 24:1831–1848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya S, Thakor A (1993) Contemporary banking theory. J Financ Intermed 3:2–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. J Polit Econ 100:992–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Warner J (1980) Measuring security price performance. J Financ Econ 8:205–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Warner J (1985) Using daily stock returns—the case of event studies. J Econ 14:3–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnermeier MK (2009) Deciphering the liquidity and credit crunch 2007–2008. J Econ Perspect 23:77–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calomiris C, Mason J (1997) Contagion and bank failures during the great depression: the June 1932 Chicago banking panic. Am Econ Rev 87:863–883

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan-Lau J, Mathieson D, Yao J (2004) Extreme contagion in equity markets. IMF Staff Papers 51(2):386–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y (1999) Banking panics: the role of the first-come, first-served rule and information externalities. J Polit Econ 107(5):946–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang T, Zheng D (2010) An empirical analysis of herd behavior in global stock markets. J Bank Finance 34(8):1911–1921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang E, Cheng J, Khorana A (2000) An examination of herd behavior in equity markets: an international perspective. J Bank Financ 24:1651–1679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie W, Huang R (1995) Following the pied piper: do individual returns herd around the market? Financ Anal J 51:31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bandt O, Hartmann P (2002) Systematic risk: a survey. In: Goodhart C, Illing G (eds) Financial crisis, contagion and the lender of last resort: a book of readings. Oxford University Press, London, pp 249–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond D, Rajan R (2001) Liquidity risk, liquidity creation and financial fragility: a theory of banking. J Polit Econ 109:2431–2465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faff R, Parwada J, Tan K (2010) Were bank bailouts effective during the 2007–2009 financial crisis? Evidence from contagion risk in the global hedge fund industry. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1493004

  • Gay GD, Timme SG, Yung K (1991) Bank failure and contagion effects: evidence from Hong Kong. J Financ Res 14:153–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorton G (1985) Bank suspension of convertibility. J Monet Econ 15:177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorton G, Huang L (2006) Bank panics and the endogeneity of central banking. J Monet Econ 53(7):1613–1629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gropp R, Moerman G (2004) Measurement of contagion in banks’ equity prices. J Int Money Financ 23(3):405–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gropp R, Vesala J (2004) Measuring bank contagion using market data. The evolving financial system and public policy. Bank of Canada. http://www.bankofcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/measuring.pdf

  • Gropp R, Vesala J, Vulpes G (2006) Equity and bond market signals as leading indicators of bank fragility. J Money Credit Bank 38(2):399–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundke P (2010) Changing default risk dependencies during the subprime crisis: DJ iTraxx subindices and goodness-of-fit-testing for copulas. Rev Manag Sci 4:91–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (2009) IMF Global Financial Stability Report 2009. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/gfsr/2009/01/pdf/text.pdf

  • James C (1991) The losses realized in bank failures. J Financ 46:1223–1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorion P, Zhang G (2007) Good and bad credit contagion: evidence from credit default swaps. J Financ Econ 84(3):860–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorion P, Zhang G (2009) Credit contagion from counterparty risk. J Financ 64(5):2053–2087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabir M, Hassan M (2005) The near-collapse of LTCM, US financial stock returns and the fed. J Bank Financ 29:441–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman G (1994) Bank contagion: a review of the theory and evidence. J Financ Serv Res 8:123–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim G, Silvapulle M, Silvapulle P (2007) Comparison of semiparametric and parametric methods for estimating copulas. Comput Stat Data Anal 51:2836–2850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kole E, Koedijk K, Verbeek M (2007) Selecting copulas for risk management. J Bank Financ 31(8):2405–2423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamy RE, Thompson GR (1986) Penn square, problem loans, and insolvency risk. J Financ Res 9:103–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann EL, D’Abrera HJM (1975) Nonparametrics—statistical methods based on ranks. Holden-Day Series in Probability and Statistics. Holden-Day, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Longstaff F (2010) The subprime credit crisis and contagion in financial markets. J Financ Econ 97:436–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil A, Frey R, Embrechts P (2005) Quantitative risk management. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettway R (1976) The effects of large bank failures upon investors’ risk cognizance in the commercial banking industry. J Financ Quant Anal 11:465–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez J (2007) Measuring financial contagion: a copula approach. J Empirical Finance 14(3):401–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock J, Watson M (2006) Introduction to Econometrics. Addison Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Swary I (1986) Stock market reaction to regulatory action in the continental Illinois crisis. J Bus 59:451–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhde A, Heimeshoff U (2009) Consolidation in banking and financial stability in Europe: emprirical evidence. J Bank Financ 33(7):1299–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiß G (2011a) Analysing contagion and bailout effects with copulae: evidence from the subprime and Japanese banking crises. J Econ Financ (Forthcoming). doi:10.1007/s12197-009-9099-x

  • Weiß G (2011b) Are Copula-GoF-tests of any practical use? Empirical evidence for stocks, commodities and FX futures. Q Rev Econ Financ 51:173–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge JM (2003) Cluster-sample methods in applied econometrics. Am Econ Rev 93:133–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorulmazer T (2010) Liquidity, bank runs and bailouts: spillover effects during the northern rock episode. J Financ Serv Res 37(2):83–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregor N. F. Weiß.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paul, S., Weiß, G. Detecting and explaining systemic risks of mortgage banks—evidence from the subprime crisis. Z Betriebswirtsch 82 (Suppl 1), 109–132 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-011-0526-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-011-0526-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation