Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Quantitative validation of two model-based methods for the correction of probe pressure deformation in ultrasound

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The acquisition of good quality ultrasound (US) images requires good acoustic coupling between the ultrasound probe and the patient’s skin. In practice, this good coupling is achieved by the operator applying a force to the skin through the probe. This force induces a deformation of the tissues underlying the probe. The distorted images deteriorate the quality of the reconstructed 3D US image.

Methods

In this work, we propose two methods to correct these deformations. These methods are based on the construction of a biomechanical model to predict the mechanical behavior of the imaged soft tissues. The originality of the methods is that they do not use external information (force or position value from sensors, or elasticity value from the literature). The model is parameterized thanks to the information contained in the image. This is allowed thanks to the optimization of two key parameters for the model which are the indentation d and the elasticity ratio α.

Results

The validation is performed on real images acquired on a gelatin-based phantom using an ultrasound probe inducing an increasing vertical indentation using a step motor. The results showed a good correction of the two methods for indentations less than 4 mm. For larger indentations, one of the two methods (guided by the similarity score) provides a better quality of correction, presenting a Euclidean distance between the contours of the reference image and the corrected image of 0.71 mm.

Conclusion

The proposed methods ensured the correction of the deformed images induced by a linear probe pressure without using any information coming from sensors (force or position), or generic information about the mechanical parameters. The corrected images can be used to obtain a corrected 3D US image.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Artignan X, Smitsmans MH, Lebesque JV, Jaffray DA, Van Her M, Bartelink H (2004) Online ultrasound image guidance for radiotherapy of prostate cancer: impact of image acquisition on prostate displacement. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59(2):595–601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Xiao G, Brady JM, Noble JA, Burcher M, English R (2002) Nonrigid registration of 3-D free-hand ultrasound images of the breast. IEEE Trans Med Imag 21(4):405–412. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2002.1000264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Virga S, Göbl R, Baust M, Navab N, Hennersperger C (2018) Use the force: deformation correction in robotic 3D ultrasound. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surgry 13(5):619–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1716-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Treece GM, Prager RW, Gee AH, Berman L (2002) "Correction of probe pressure artifacts in freehand 3D ultrasound. Med Image Anal 6(3):199–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-8415(02)00080-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lindop JE, Treece GM, Gee AH, Prager RW (2006) 3D elastography using freehand ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 32(4):529–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.11.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Colley E, Carroll J, Thomas S, Varcoe RL, Simmons A, Barber T (2018) A methodology for non-invasive 3-D surveillance of arteriovenous fistulae using freehand ultrasound. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 65(8):1885–1891. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2017.2782781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang Z, Zhou Y, Bi Y, Zhou M, Wendler T, Navab N (2021) Deformation-aware robotic 3D ultrasound. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 6(4):7675–7682. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2021.3099080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berge CSZ, Kapoor A, Navab N (2014) Orientation-driven ultrasound compounding using uncertainty information. In: Chama D, Stoyanov DL, Collins I, Sakuma P, Abolmaesumi P, Jannin P (eds) Information processing in computer-assisted interventions. Springer International Publishing, pp 236–245

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun SY, Anthony BW, Gilbertson MW (2010) Trajectory-based deformation correction in ultrasound images, vol. 7629, pp. 76290A-76290A-9.

  10. Burcher MR, Lianghao H, Noble JA (2001) "Deformation correction in ultrasound images using contact force measurements," In: Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis (MMBIA 2001), pp. 63–70, https://doi.org/10.1109/MMBIA.2001.991700

  11. Pheiffer TS, Thompson RC, Rucker DC, Simpson AL, Miga MI (2014) Model-based correction of tissue compression for tracked ultrasound in soft tissue image-guided surgery. Ultrasound Med Biol 40(4):788–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.11.003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Dahmani J, Petit Y, Laporte C (2017) "Model-based correction of ultrasound image deformations due to probe pressure," In: Medical Imaging 2017: Image Processing, SPIE, vol. 10133, pp. 392–400

  13. Boehler T, Peitgen H-O (2008) Reducing motion artifacts in 3-D breast ultrasound using non-linear registration. In: Metaxas D, Axel L, Fichtinger G, Székely G (eds) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention–MICCAI 2008. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 998–1005

    Google Scholar 

  14. Treece GM, Gee AH, Prager RW (2005) RF and amplitude-based probe pressure correction for 3D ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 31(4):493–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.12.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chan TF, Vese LA (2001) Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans Image Process 10(2):266–277. https://doi.org/10.1109/83.902291

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dahmani J, Laporte C, Pereira D, Belanger P, Petit Y (2020) "Predictive model for designing soft-tissue mimicking ultrasound phantoms with adjustable elasticity. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 67(4):715–726. https://doi.org/10.1109/tuffc.2019.2953190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Fonds de recherche du Québec—Nature et technologies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. École de Technologie Supérieure, 1100 Notre-Dame Street West, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Jawad Dahmani, Yvan Petit & Catherine Laporte

Authors
  1. Jawad Dahmani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yvan Petit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Catherine Laporte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jawad Dahmani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare to have no conflict of interest.

Human and animals rights

No humans or animals were used in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dahmani, J., Petit, Y. & Laporte, C. Quantitative validation of two model-based methods for the correction of probe pressure deformation in ultrasound. Int J CARS 19, 309–320 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-023-03006-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-023-03006-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation