Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A PRM approach for early prediction of breast cancer response to chemotherapy based on registered MR images

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to provide and optimize a performing algorithm for predicting the breast cancer response rate to the first round of chemotherapy using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). This provides an early recognition of breast tumor reaction to chemotherapy by using the Parametric Response Map (PRM) method.

Methods

PRM may predict the breast cancer response to chemotherapy by analyzing voxel-by-voxel temporal intra-tumor changes during one round of chemotherapy. Indeed, the tumor recognizes intra-tumor changes concerning its vascularity, which is an important criterion in the present study. This method is mainly based on spatial image affine registration between the breast tumor MRI volumes, acquired before and after the first cycle of chemotherapy, and region growing segmentation of the tumor volume. To evaluate our method, we used a retrospective study of 40 patients provided by a collaborating institute.

Results

PRM allows a color map to be created with the percentages of positive, negative and stable breast tumor response during the first round of chemotherapy, identifying each region with its response rate. We assessed the accuracy of the proposed method using technical and medical validation methods. The technical validation was based on landmarks-based registration and fully manual segmentation. The medical evaluation was based on the accuracy calculation of the standard reference of anatomic pathology. The p-values and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristics were calculated to evaluate the proposed PRM method.

Conclusion

We performed and evaluated the proposed PRM method to study and analyze the behavior of a tumor during the first round of chemotherapy, based on the intra-tumor changes of MR breast tumor images. The AUC obtained for the PRM method is considered as relevant in the early prediction of breast tumor response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.who.int/.

  2. https://itk.org/.

References

  1. Kaufmann M, Von Minckwitz G, Mamounas EP, Cameron D, Carey LA, Cristofanilli M, Denker M, Eiermann W, Gnant M, Harris JR, Karn T, Liedtke C, Mauri D, Rouzier R, Ruckhaeberle E, Semiglazov V, Symmans WF, Tutt A, Pusztai L (2012) Recommendations from an international consensus conference on the current status and future of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 19(5):1508–1516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Martelotto LG, Ng CK, Piscuoglio S, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS (2014) Breast cancer intra-tumor heterogeneity. Breast Cancer Res 16(3):210

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lober RM, Cho YJ, Tang Y, Barnes PD, Edwards MS, Vogel H, Yeom KW (2014) Diffusion-weighted MRI derived apparent diffusion coefficient identifies prognostically distinct subgroups of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. J Neurooncol 117(1):175–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berg WA, Bandos AI, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Jong RA, Pisano ED (2016) Ultrasound as the primary screening test for breast cancer: analysis from ACRIN 6666. JNCI: J Natl Cancer Inst 108(4):djv367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. El Adoui M, Drisis S, Larhmam MA, Lemort M, Benjelloun M (2017) Breast cancer heterogeneity analysis as index of response to treatment using MRI images: a review. Imaging Med 9(4):109–119

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hayes C, Padhani AR, Leach MO (2002) Assessing changes in tumour vascular function using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. NMR Biomed 15(2):154–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Johansen R, Jensen LR, Rydland J, Goa PE, Kvistad KA, Bathen TF, Axelson DE, Lundgren S, Gribbestad IS (2009) Predicting survival and early clinical response to primary chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced breast cancer using DCE-MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 29(6):1300–1307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Padhani AR, Hayes C, Assersohn L, Powles T, Makris A, Suckling J, Leach MO, Husband JE (2006) Prediction of clinicopathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy at contrast-enhanced MR imaging: initial clinical results. Radiology 239(2):361–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahmed A, Gibbs P, Pickles M, Turnbull L (2013) Texture analysis in assessment and prediction of chemotherapy response in breast cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 38(1):89–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fox MJ, Gibbs P, Pickles MD (2015) Minkowski functionals: an MRI texture analysis tool for determination of the aggressiveness of breast cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 43(4):903–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim JH, Ko ES, Lim Y, Lee KS, Han BK, Ko EY, Hahn SY, Nam SJ (2016) Breast cancer heterogeneity: MR imaging texture analysis and survival outcomes. Radiology 282(3):665–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boes JL, Hoff BA, Hylton N, Pickles MD, Turnbull LW, Schott AF, Rehemtulla A, Chamberlain R, Lemasson B, Chenevert TL, Galbán CJ, Meyer CR, Ross BD (2014) Image registration for quantitative parametric response mapping of cancer treatment response. Transl Oncol 7(1):101–110

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D, Marchal G, Suetens P (1997) Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 16(2):187–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Galbán CJ, Chenevert TL, Meyer CR, Tsien C, Lawrence TS, Hamstra Larry Junck, Sundgren Pia C, Johnson Timothy D, Galbán Stefanie, Sebolt-Leopold Judith S, Rehemtulla Alnawaz, Ross Brian D (2011) Prospective analysis of parametric response map-derived MRI biomarkers: identification of early and distinct glioma response patterns not predicted by standard radiographic assessment. Clin Cancer Res 17(14):4751–4760

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lucas BD, Kanade T (1981) An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. In: Conference Paper, Proceedings of the 1981 DARPA image understanding workshop, pp 121–130

  16. Rueckert D, Sonoda LI, Hayes C, Hill DL, Leach MO, Hawkes DJ (1999) Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18(8):712–721

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Diez Y, Gubern-Mérida A, Wang L, Diekmann S, Martí J, Platel B, Martí R et al (2014) Comparison of methods for current-to-prior registration of breast DCE-MRI. In: International workshop on digital mammography. Springer, Cham, pp 689–695

  18. Guo Y, Sivaramakrishna R, Lu CC, Suri JS, Laxminarayan S (2006) Breast image registration techniques: a survey. Med Biol Eng Comput 44(1–2):15–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ratan R, Kohli PG, Sharma SK, Kohli AK (2016) Un-supervised segmentation and quantisation of malignancy from breast MRI images. J Natl Sci Found Sri Lanka 44(4):437–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maicas G, Carneiro G, Bradley AP (2017 April) Globally optimal breast mass segmentation from DCE-MRI using deep semantic segmentation as shape prior. In: 2017 IEEE 14th international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI 2017). IEEE, pp 305–309

  21. Zhao YQ, Wang XH, Wang XF, Shih FY (2014) Retinal vessels segmentation based on level set and region growing. Pattern Recogn 47(7):2437–2446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rouhi R, Jafari M, Kasaei S, Keshavarzian P (2015) Benign and malignant breast tumors classification based on region growing and CNN segmentation. Expert Syst Appl 42(3):990–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. El Adoui M, Drisis S, Benjelloun M (2017) Analyzing breast tumor heterogeneity to predict the response to chemotherapy using 3D MR images registration. In: Proceedings of the 2017 international conference on smart digital environment. ACM, pp 56–63

  24. Zhong H, Kim J, Gordon JJ, Brown SL, Movsas B, Chetty IJ (2015) Morphological analysis of tumor regression and its impact on deformable image registration for adaptive radiotherapy of lung cancer patients. In: World congress on medical physics and biomedical engineering, June 7–12, 2015, Toronto, Canada. Springer, Cham, pp 579–582

  25. Sezgin M (2004) Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation. J Electron Imaging 13(1):146–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tustison NJ, Avants BB, Cook PA, Zheng Y, Egan A, Yushkevich PA, Gee JC (2010) N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29(6):1310–1320

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hisham MB, Yaakob SN, Raof RA, Nazren AA, Embedded NW (2015) Template matching using sum of squared difference and normalized cross correlation. In: 2015 IEEE student conference on research and development (SCOReD). IEEE, pp 100–104

  28. Nolden M, Zelzer S, Seitel A, Wald D, Müller Michael, Franz Alfred M, Maleike Daniel, Fangerau Markus, Baumhauer Matthias, Maier-Hein Lena, Maier-Hein Klaus H, Meinzer Hans-Peter, Wolf Ivo (2013) The medical imaging interaction toolkit: challenges and advances. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 8(4):607–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44(3):837–845

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our thanks are addressed to Dr. Marc Lemort, the head of the Radiology Department at the Jules Bordet Institute in Brussels, for welcoming us and offering the dataset used to evaluate our method.

Funding This research was financially supported by the University of Mons in Belgium.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed El Adoui.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El Adoui, M., Drisis, S. & Benjelloun, M. A PRM approach for early prediction of breast cancer response to chemotherapy based on registered MR images. Int J CARS 13, 1233–1243 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1790-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1790-y

Keywords

Navigation