Skip to main content
Log in

PHIL® (precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid): retrospective multicenter experience on 178 patients in peripheral embolizations

  • Vascular and Interventional Radiology
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to analyze safety and effectiveness of PHIL® (Microvention, CA-USA) in peripheral endovascular embolization procedures, both in elective and emergent scenarios.

Materials and Methods

This is a multicenter retrospective study, involving 178 patients from five interventional radiology departments from January 2017 to December 2021. Patients treated by an endovascular embolization with PHIL® were included; different PHIL® viscosities were adopted. Exclusion criteria were: neuroradiological endovascular interventions, other cohesive liquid embolics adopted during the same procedure, follow-up < 30 days. Technical success was intended as definitive target vessel occlusion without the need for other embolics after PHIL® injection. Clinical success was considered as restoration of hemodynamic status in case of emergent embolization and improvement of clinical conditions in case of elective procedures, without additional interventions at 30 days.

Results

Sixty-four women and 114 men, mean age 62 years (range 6–91), were evaluated. Sixty-three patients were in elective scenarios (AVMs, type-II endoleaks, tumors, varices, aneurysms, varicoceles) and 115 were in emergent settings (hemorrhage, pseudoaneurysms, hemoptysis, priapism); 190 procedures were performed in 178 patients. Overall technical and clinical success rates were 94.7% and 92.1%, respectively. The complications rate was 7.4% (6 grade-I, 7 grade-III, 1 grade-IV). PHIL®-25 was the more adopted viscosity; totally, 311 vials were injected (rate: 1.64 vial/procedure).

Conclusion

In this series, PHIL® proved to be a safe and effective liquid embolic in peripheral embolizations, both in elective and emergent scenarios. The pre-filled syringe preparation allowed operators to use it even when unplanned at beginning of the intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Molyneux AJ, Coley SC (2000) Embolization of spinal cord arteriovenous malformations with an ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (Onyx liquid embolic system): Report of two cases. J Neurosurg 93(2 Suppl):304–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lucatelli P, Corona M, Teodoli L et al (2021) Use of Phil embolic agent for bleeding in non-neurological interventions. J Clin Med 10(4):701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vollherbst DF, Sommer CM, Ulfert C et al (2017) Liquid embolic agents for endovascular embolization: evaluation of an established (Onyx) and a novel (PHIL) embolic agent in an in vitro AVM model. Am J Neuroradiol 38:1377–1382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Piacentino F, Fontana F, Curti M et al (2021) Non-adhesive liquid embolic agents in extra-cranial district: state of the art and review of the literature. J Clin Med 10(21):4841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Koçer N, Hanimoglu H, Batur S et al (2016) Preliminary experience with precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid in brain arteriovenous malformations. Diagn Interv Radiol 22(2):184–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Samaniego EA, Kalousek V, Abdo G, Ortega-Gutierrez S (2016) Preliminary experience with precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid (PHIL) in treating cerebral AVMs. J Neurointerv Surg 8(12):1253–1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lamin S, Chew HS, Chavda S et al (2017) Embolization of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas using PHIL liquid embolic agent in 26 patients: a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38(1):127–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Leyon JJ, Chavda S, Thomas A, Lamin S (2016) Preliminary experience with the liquid embolic material agent PHIL (precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid) in treating cranial and spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: technical note. J Neurointerv Surg 8(6):596–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Varadharajan S, Ramalingaiah AH, Saini J et al (2018) Precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid embolization of intracranial vascular shunts: initial experience and technical note. J Neurosurg 129(5):1217–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Psychogios G, Berlis A, Märkl B et al (2017) Percutaneous phil™-embolization for preoperative therapy of carotid body paragangliomas. Laryngorhinootologie 96(1):22–26

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kurda D, Guduguntla G, Maingard J et al (2019) Precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid (PHIL) embolic for the treatment of a uterine arteriovenous malformation: a technical report. CVIR Endovasc 2(1):17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Giurazza F, Corvino F, Silvestre M et al (2021) Embolization of peripheral arteriovenous malformations and fistulas with precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid (PHIL®). Radiol Med 126(3):474–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lamanna A, Maingard J, Florescu G et al (2021) Endovascular balloon-assisted liquid embolisation of soft tissue vascular malformations: technical feasibility and safety. CVIR Endovasc 4(1):49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Helmy A, Shaida N (2017) Treatment of type II endoleaks with a novel agent: precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid (PHIL). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 40(7):1094–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Prashar A, Butt S, Shaida N (2020) Introducing PHIL (precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid): a new embolic agent for the body interventional radiologist. Diagn Interv Radiol 26:140–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Filippiadis DK, Binkert C, Pellerin O, Hoffmann RT, Krajina A, Pereira PL (2017) CIRSE quality assurance document and standards for classification of complications: the CIRSE classification system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 40:1141–1146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Giurazza F, Corvino F, Cangiano G et al (2019) Transarterial embolization of peripheral high-flow arteriovenous malformation with ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (Onyx ®): single-center 10-year experience. Radiol Med 124(2):154–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vollherbst DF, Otto R, Do T et al (2018) Imaging artifacts of onyx and PHIL on conventional CT, cone-beam CT and MRI in an animal model. Interv Neuroradiol 24(6):693–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmitt N, Floca RO, Paech D et al (2021) Imaging artifacts of liquid embolic agents on conventional CT in an experimental in vitro model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 42(1):126–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Raissi D, Yu Q, Mardini SH (2018) Upper gastrointestinal bleed embolization with onyx®: the “Tattoo Effect.” J Clin Imaging Sci 8:46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. In’t Veld M, Willems PW (2016) Absence of skin discoloration after transarterial embolization of a subcutaneous auricular arteriovenous malformation with PHIL. Interv Neuroradiol 22(5):606–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith SJ, Thomas A, Ashpole RD (2009) Intra-operative combustion of Onyx embolic material. Br J Neurosurg 23(1):76–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vollherbst DF, Otto R, von Deimling A (2018) Evaluation of a novel liquid embolic agent (precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid (PHIL)) in an animal endovascular embolization model. J Neurointerv Surg 10(3):268–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vollherbst DF, Sommer CM, Ulfert C et al (2017) Liquid embolic agents for endovascular embolization: evaluation of an established (Onyx) and a novel (PHIL) embolic agent in an in vitro AVM model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38(7):1377–1382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Giurazza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent to study participation was waived due to the retrospective design.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giurazza, F., Cionfoli, N., Paladini, A. et al. PHIL® (precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid): retrospective multicenter experience on 178 patients in peripheral embolizations. Radiol med 127, 1303–1312 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-022-01552-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-022-01552-y

Keywords

Navigation