Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic value of CT pulmonary angiography parameters in acute pulmonary embolism

  • Chest Radiology
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the first-line test in acute pulmonary embolism (APE) diagnostic algorithm, but its correlation with short-term outcome remains not clear at all. The aim is to determine whether CTPA findings can predict 30-day mortality of patients with APE in Emergency Department.

Methods

This retrospective monocentric study involved 780 patients with APE diagnosed at the Emergency Department of our institution (period 2010–2019). These CTPA findings were evaluated: embolic obstruction burden score (Qanadli score), common pulmonary artery trunk diameter, right-to-left ventricular ratio, azygos vein and coronary sinus diameters. Comorbidities and fatal/nonfatal adverse outcomes within 30 days were recorded. Troponin I values were correlated with angiographic parameters with multiple logistic regression analysis.

Results

The all-cause and APE-related 30-day mortality rates were 5.9% and 3.6%, respectively. Patients who died within 30 days were older with higher prevalence rates of malignancy. Qanadli score and all CTPA parameters correlate with Troponin I level and the presence of RVD at echocardiography (p values < 0.0001). Instead, RV/LV ratio and coronary sinus diameter correlate with 30-day mortality (p values < 0.05). At the multivariate logistic regression analysis, only coronary sinus and RVD remained significant with an HR = 2.5 (95% CI 1.1–5.6) and HR = 1.9 (95% CI 0.95–3.7), respectively.

Conclusion

CTPA quantification of right ventricular strain is an accurate predictor of 30-day mortality. In particular, it seems that a dilated coronary sinus (>9 mm) has an additional prognostic value in association with echocardiographic signs of right-heart disfunction and high Troponin I levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

APE:

Acute pulmonary embolism

ED:

Emergency department

RVD:

Right ventricular dysfunction

CTPA:

Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography

SD:

Standard deviation

HR:

Hazard ratio

RV/LV:

Right ventricle-to-left ventricle ratio

CTEPH:

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

References

  1. Ghaye B, Ghuysen A, Bruyere PG et al (2006) Can CT pulmonary angiography allow assessment of severity and prognosis in patients presenting with pulmonary embolism? What the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics 26:23–40. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.261055062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Horlander KT, Mannino DM, Leeper KV et al (2003) Pulmonary embolism mortality in the United States 1979–1998: an analysis using multiple-cause mortality data. Arch Intern Med 163(14):1711–1717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Torbicki A, Perrier A, Konstantinides S et al (2008) Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: the task force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 29:2276–2315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vanni S, Viviani G, Baioni M et al (2013) Prognostic value of plasma lactate levels among patients with acute pulmonary embolism: the thrombo-embolism lactate outcome study. Ann Emerg Med 61:330–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grifoni S, Olivotto I, Cecchini P et al (2000) Short-term clinical outcome of patients with acute pulmonary embolism, normal blood pressure and echocardiographic right ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 101:2817–2822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Becattini C, Vedovati MC, Agnelli G (2007) Prognostic values of troponins in acute pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. Circulation 116:427–433

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wood CE (2002) Major pulmonary embolism: review of a pathophysiologic approach to the golden hour of hemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism. Chest 121:877–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Remy-Jardin M, Pistolesi M, Goodman R et al (2007) Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: a statement from the fleischner society. Radiology 245(2):315–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bettmann MA, Baginski SG, White RD et al (2012) ACR appropriateness criteria® acute chest pain: suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thorac Imaging 27(2):W28–W31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yazdani M, Lau CT, Lempel JK et al (2015) Historical evolution of imaging techniques for the evaluation of pulmonary embolism. Radiographics 35:1245–1262. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015140280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldhaber SZ, Visiani L, De Rosa M (1999) Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the international cooperative pulmonary embolism registry (ICOPER). Lancet 353(9162):1386–1389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kang DK, Thilo C, Schoepf J et al (2011) CT signs of right ventricular dysfunction. JACC Cardiovasc Imag 4(8):841–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghaye B, Ghuysen A, Willems V et al (2006) Severe pulmonary embolism: pulmonary artery clot load scores and cardiovascular parameters as predictors of mortality. Radiology 239(3):884–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. John C, Marti C, Poletti PA, Perrier A (2014) Hemodynamic indexes derived from computed tomography angiography to predict pulmonary embolism related mortality. BioMed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/363756

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Collomb D, Paramelle PJ, Calaque O et al (2003) Severity assessment of acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation using helical CT. Eur Radiol 13:1508–1514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Van der Bijl N, Klok FA, Huisman MV (2011) Measurements of right and left ventricular function by ECG-synchronized CT scanning in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: usefulness for predicting short-term outcome. Chest 140(4):1008–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Van der Meer RW, Pattynama PMT, Van Stijen MJL et al (2005) Right ventricular dysfunction and pulmonary obstruction index at helical CT: prediction of clinical outcome during 3-months follow up in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Radiology 235(3):798–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghuysen A, Ghaye B, Willems V et al (2005) Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography and prognostic significance in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Thorax 60(11):956–961

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu M, Miao R, Guo X et al (2016) Saddle pulmonary embolism: laboratory and computed tomographic pulmonary angiographic findings to predict short-term mortality. Heart Lung Circ 26(2):134–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2016.02.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mastora I, Remy-Jardin M, Masson P et al (2003) Severity of acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation of a new spiral CT angiographic score in correlation with echocardiographic data. Eur Radiol 13:29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Qanadli SD, El Hajjam M, Vieillard-Baron A et al (2001) New CT index to quantify arterial obstruction in pulmonary embolism: comparison with angiographic index and echocardiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:1415–1420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Obradovic D, Joves B, Karan SP et al (2016) Correlation between the Wells score and the Qanadli index in patients with pulmonary embolism. Clin Resp J. https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.122291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Becattini C, Agnelli G, Germini F et al (2014) Computed tomography to assess risk of death in acute pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. Eur Resp J 43(6):1678–1690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C et al (2019) 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vedovati MC, Germini F, Agnelli G, Becattini C (2013) Prognostic role of embolic burden assessed at computed tomography angiography in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thrombosis Hemostasis 11(12):2092–2102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Meinel FG, Nance JW, Schoepf UJ et al (2015) Predictive value of computed tomography in acute pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.01.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Plasencia-Martinez JM, Carmona-Bayonas A, Calvo-Temprano D et al (2017) Prognostic value of computed tomography pulmonary angiography indices in patients with cancer-related pulmonary embolism: data from a multicenter cohort study. Eur J Radiol 87:66–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bèlohlavek J, Dytrych V, Linhart A (2013) Pulmonary embolism part I: epidemiology, risk factors and risk stratification, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism. Exp Clin Cardiol 18(2):129–138

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Aviram G, Rogowski O, Gotler Y et al (2008) Real-time risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism by grading the reflux of contrast into the inferior vena cava on computerized tomographic pulmonary angiography. J Thrombosis Haemostasis 6(9):1488–1493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

Authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DC, CM, EC and AB contributed to radiological data evaluation and manuscript editing. SV performed statistical analysis; CC and PN were involved in patients collection. VM and MB contributed to final approval.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diletta Cozzi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to the publication of this article.

Ethical approval

All procedures in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our University Hospital (ref. 15671_oss).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent to publish

Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cozzi, D., Moroni, C., Cavigli, E. et al. Prognostic value of CT pulmonary angiography parameters in acute pulmonary embolism. Radiol med 126, 1030–1036 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-021-01364-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-021-01364-6

Keywords

Navigation