Abstract
Purpose
This study was done to evaluate the appropriateness of dose indices in computed tomography (CT) by comparing the body computed tomography dose index (CTDI) and the size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) to determine which of these two parameters is more appropriate to estimate the radiation dose to both adult and paediatric patients.
Materials and methods
We analysed 150 thoracic CT and 150 abdominal CT scans, half of which from adult patients and the other half from paediatric patients. We compared the values of the CTDIvol and the SSDE reporting the average, maximum and minimum percentage difference for each body region and depending on the age of the patients.
Results
In the thoracic CT and abdominal CT scans, we found values of difference between the SSDE and the CTDIvol of 26.3 and 27.3 %, respectively, in adult patients and of 46.9 and 48.5 % in paediatric patients.
Conclusions
The SSDE is a good tool for estimating the average radiation dose for a given patient depending on the input parameters and the dimensions of the specific person in question before a CT examination.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Smith-Bindaman R (2010) Is computed-tomography safe? New Engl J Med 363:1–4
Brenner DJ, Hricak H (2010) Radiation exposure from medical imaging: time to regulate? JAMA 304:208–209
Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Bulas D et al (2012) Image gently 5 years later: what goals remain to be accomplished in radiation protection for children? AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:477–479
Kalra MK, Maher MM, Tothet TL et al (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628
Golding SJ (2010) Radiation exposure in CT: what is the professionally responsible approach? Radiology 255:683–686
Robinson TJ, Robinson JD, Kanal K (2013) Implementation of the ACR dose index registry at a large academic institution: early experience. J Digit Imaging 26:309–315
Cook TS, Zimmerman SL, Steingall S et al (2011) RADIANCE: an automated, enterprise-wide solution for archiving and reporting CT radiation dose estimates. Radiographic 31:1833–1846
Boone J, Strauss KJ, Cody DD et al (2011) Size specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. Report of AAPM Task Group 204. College Park: American Association of Physicists in Medicine
Wilting JE, Zwartkruis A, van Van Leeuwen MS (2001) A rational approach to dose reduction in CT: individualized scan protocols. Eur Radiol 11:2627–2632
Bauhs NT (2008) Dosimetry: comparison of measurement techniques and devices. Radiographics 28:245–253
Colagrande S, Origgi D, Zatelli G et al (2014) CT exposure in adult and paediatric patients: a review of the mechanisms of damage, relative dose and consequent possible risks. Radiol Med 119:803–810
Li B, Behrman RH, Norbash AM (2012) Comparison of topogram-based body size indices for CT dose consideration and scan protocol optimization. Med Phys 39:3456–3465
Larson DB, Wang LL, Podberesky DJ, Goske MJ (2013) System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. Part I. Optimization model. Radiology 269:167–176
Larson DB, Malarik RJ, Hall SM, Podberesky D (2013) System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. Part II. Process control system. Radiology 269:177–185
Christianson O, Li X, Frush D, Samei E (2012) Automated size-specific CT dose monitoring program. Assessing variability in CT dose. Med Phys 39:7131–7139
Brady SL, Kaufman RA (2012) Investigation of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Report 204 size-specific dose estimates for pediatric CT implementation. Radiology 265:832–840
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to the publication of this article
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Valeri, G., Cegna, S., Mari, A. et al. Evaluating the appropriateness of dosimetric indices in body CT. Radiol med 120, 466–473 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-014-0476-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-014-0476-y