Skip to main content
Log in

Study of neurinomas with ultrasound contrast media: review of a case series to identify characteristic imaging patterns

Lo studio dei neurinomi con mezzo di contrasto ecografico: valutazione dei patterns caratteristici di riconoscimento diagnostico

  • Musculoskeletal Radiology / Radiologia Muscoloscheletrica
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there exists a characteristic distribution pattern of vessels within neurinomas that may be used to characterise this type of lesion by employing a contrast-specific ultrasound technique.

Materials and methods

Between January 2003 and May 2010, 66 suspected neurinomas were evaluated according to their sonographic features (solid fusiform mass with well-defined margins located in direct continuity with the nerve that was not always discernible and heterogeneous as a result of the presence of small cystic areas or calcifications). The lesions were examined using a sonographic contrast medium consisting of sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles and equipment with dedicated contrast-specific software [contrast tuned imaging (CnTI)]. Of these lesions, five were excluded from the analysis because the definitive diagnosis was not available (in two cases, the follow-up was still in progress, whereas in the remaining three, there was no follow-up). Our study, therefore, is based on 61 surgically excised lesions that were confirmed to be neurinomas by histology, which is regarded as the gold standard.

Results

In 41/61 cases (67.2%), we identified an enhancement pattern that we termed reticular owing to the interweaving of blood vessels, of which two subtypes were identified depending on whether the interwoven vessels were densely or sparsely packed: loose-knit reticular in 18/41, and tight-knit reticular in 23/41. In 20/61 (32.8%) cases, we observed a vascular pattern of diffuse heterogeneous enhancement, which was divided into two subtypes based on the presence of one (7/20) or more (13/20) avascular areas.

Conclusions

Results showed that all neurinomas studied could be divided into two groups according to the type of enhancement pattern observed: reticular or diffuse heterogeneous.

Riassunto

Obiettivo

Scopo dello studio è valutare, mediante l’impiego di una tecnica ecografica contrasto-specifica, se esiste una distribuzione caratteristica dei vasi all’interno dei neurinomi che possa essere usata per una caratterizzazione del tipo di lesione.

Materiali e metodi

Nel periodo compreso tra gennaio 2003 e maggio 2010 sono state valutate nel nostro dipartimento 66 lesioni sospette per neurinoma in base alle loro caratteristiche ecografiche (formazioni solide, fusiformi, a margini netti, in diretta continuità con la fibra nervosa, non sempre riconoscibile, disomogenee per l’eventuale presenza di piccole aree similcistiche o calcificazioni), ed esaminate con mezzo di contrasto (MdC) ecografico, costituito da microbolle a base di esafluoruro di zolfo e apparecchiatura dotata di software dedicato Contrast Tuned Imaging (CnTI) contrasto specifico. Di queste lesioni, 5 sono state escluse dall’analisi in quanto non era disponibile una diagnosi definitiva (n=2 follow-up in corso; n=3 assenza di follow-up). Pertanto il nostro studio si basa unicamente sulle 61 lesioni asportate chirurgicamente e confermate come neurinomi all’esame istologico, considerato come gold standard.

Risultati

In 41/61 (67,2%) casi abbiamo identificato una distribuzione del mezzo di contrasto definita “a reticolo” in base all’intreccio formato dalle strutture vascolari, in cui si riconoscono due sottotipi: “reticolo a maglie larghe” in 18/41 e “reticolo a maglie strette” in 23/41, distinti in base all’aspetto dell’incrocio dei vasi, se più rado o più fitto. In 20/61 (32,8%) casi abbiamo osservato un diverso pattern di vascolarizzazione, denominato “impregnazione diffusa disomogenea”, a sua volta suddiviso in due sottotipi in base alla presenza di una (7/20) o più aree avascolari (13/20).

Conclusioni

I risultati ottenuti in questo studio hanno dimostrato che tutti i neurinomi analizzati possono essere distinti in due gruppi, in base al tipo di pattern vascolare riscontrato: di tipo reticolare o ad impregnazione diffusa disomogenea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References/Bibliografia

  1. De Marchi A, De Petro P, Pozza S et al (2004) Apparato muscoloscheletrico. In: Rossi S, Calliada F, Martegani A (eds) Mezzi di contrasto in ecografia. Testo atlante. Poletto editore, Gudo Visconti, Milano, pp 256–261

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beaman FD, Kransdorf MJ, Menke DM (2004) Schwannoma: radiologicpathologic correlation. Radiographics 24:1477–1481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Simonovsky V (1997) Peripheral nerve schwannoma preoperatively diagnosed by sonography: report of three cases and discussion. Eur J Radiol 25:47–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beggs I (1997) Pictorial review: imaging of peripheral nerve tumours. Clin Radiol 52:8–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Dahmane M et al (2002) Ultrasound of tendons and nerves. Eur Radiol 12:44–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. De Marchi A, Verga L, Pozza S et al (2005) I tumori dei tessuti molli. In: Faletti C, Masciocchi C (eds) Trattato di diagnostica per immagini nella patologia muscoloschelerica. UTET, Torino, pp 141–159

    Google Scholar 

  7. Monetti (2000) Ecografia muscolo tendinea. Imaging integrato. Idelson-Gnocchi, Napoli

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kuo YL, Yao WJ, Chiu HY (2005) Role of sonography in the preoperative assessment of neurilemmoma. J Clin Ultrasound 33:87–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Beggs I (1999) Sonographic appearances of nerve tumours. J Clin Ultrasound 27:363–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bendix N, Wolf C, Gruber H, Bodner G (2005) Pictorial essay: Ultrasound of tumours and tumour-like lesions of peripheral nerves. Ultraschall Med 26:318–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Burns PN, Wilson SR (2006) Microbubble contrast for radiological imaging: principles. Ultrasound Q 22:5–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Burns PN, Powers J, Hope UD, Simpson FVT (1996) Harmonic imaging: principles and preliminary results. Angiology 47:S63–S74

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ricci P, Laghi A, Cantisani V et al (2005) Contrast-enhanced sonography with SonoVue: enhancement patterns of benign focal liver lesions and correlation with dynamic gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:821–827

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Piscaglia F, Lencioni R, Sagrini E et al (2010) Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 36:531–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sorelli PG, Cosgrove DO, Svensson WE et al (2010) Can contrast-enhanced sonography distinguish benign from malignant breast masses? J Clin Ultrasound 38:177–181

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Amoretti N, Grimaud A, Hovorka E et al (2006) Peripheral neurogenic tumours: is the use of different types of imaging diagnostically useful? Clinical Imaging 30:201–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schlief R, Bauer A (1996) Ultrasound contrast media. New perspectives in ultrasound diagnosis. Radiologe 36:51–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ricci P, Cantisani V, Ballesio L et al (2007) Benign and malignant breast lesions: efficacy of real time contrastenhanced ultrasuond vs MRI. Ultrashall Med 28:57–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. De Marchi A, De Petro P, Faletti C et al (2003) Echo color power Doppler with contrast medium to evaluate vascularization in lesion of the soft tissue of the limbs. Chir Organi Mov 88:225–231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bartolozzi C, Crocetti L, Della Pinna MC (2007) How to differentiate liver lesions in cirrhosis. JBR-BTR 90:475–481

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kook SH, Kwag HG (2003) Value of contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography using a microbubble echo-enhancing agent in evaluation of small breast lesions. J Clin Ultrasound 31:227–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Calliada F, Campani R, Bottinelli O et al (1998) Ultrasound contrast agents: basic principles. Eur J Radiol 27(Suppl 2):S157–S160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sofka CM, Lin D, Adler RS (2005) Advantages of colour B-mode imaging with contrast optimization in sonography of low-contrast musculoskeletal lesion and structures in the foot and ankle. J Ultrasound Med 24:215–218

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Pozza.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Marchi, A., Pozza, S., Sutera, R. et al. Study of neurinomas with ultrasound contrast media: review of a case series to identify characteristic imaging patterns. Radiol med 116, 634–643 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-011-0653-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-011-0653-1

Keywords

Parole chiave

Navigation