Skip to main content
Log in

Health technology assessment: principles, methods and current status

Health technology assessment: principi, metodi e sviluppo attuale

  • Resources Management and Health Economy/Gestione Risorse ed Economia Sanitaria in Radiologia
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This paper analyses the methodological and technical aspects of health technology assessment (HTA) as a tool for evaluating health technologies and procedures, with special reference to diagnostic imaging; describes the main experiences with HTA at the international and national level; outlines the most important HTA projects in Italy, and analyses the effects of HTA on health care strategies and policies.

Materials and methods

The work was carried out in three phases. In the first phase, the authors analysed the principles, methods and instruments of HTA; in the second, they evaluated the current status of HTA in different countries; and in the third, they defined the impact of HTA on the decision-making process in health care.

Results

Since the 1970s, technological innovation has been accompanied by the development of methods for the multidisciplinary assessment of the technical, scientific, economic, ethical and social aspects inherent in the use of new technologies. The method is implemented at an international level by a network of public and private bodies that carry out HTA in support of health care policies.

Conclusions

Because the application of HTA is still in its early stages in Italy, it is necessary to promote its development by drawing on consolidated international experiences.

Abstract

Obiettivo

Analizzare gli aspetti metodologici e tecnici dell’Health Technology Assessment come strumento di valutazione delle tecnologie e procedure sanitarie, con particolare riferimento all’utilizzo in campo radiologico; descrivere le principali esperienze nel campo dell’HTA presenti attualmente a livello internazionale e nazionale; effettuare una mappatura della diffusione dell’utilizzo dell’HTA in Italia ai diversi livelli istituzionali; analizzare le ricadute che l’adozione dei principi e degli strumenti dell’HTA a livello istituzionale può avere sulle strategie e le scelte del sistema sanitario.

Materiale e metodi

Il lavoro si è articolato in 3 fasi distinte. La prima fase è stata quella dell’analisi dei principi, dei metodi e degli strumenti dell’HTA. La seconda fase si è basata sulla valutazione dello stato attuale dell’HTA a diversi livelli. La terza fase ha permesso di definire il potenziale contributo dell’HTA al processo di decision making all’interno delle aziende sanitarie.

Risultati

Dagli anni ‘70 ad oggi l’innovazione scientifica è andata di pari passo con lo sviluppo di un metodo di valutazione multidisciplinare che si occupa di analizzare gli aspetti tecnici, scientifici, economici, etici, legali e sociali conseguenti all’applicazione delle nuove tecnologie. Tale metodologia è implementata a livello internazionale attraverso una rete di società pubbliche e private che svolgono Health Technology Assessment allo scopo di supportare le decisioni di politica sanitaria.

Conclusioni

Dato che in Italia l’applicazione dell’HTA è ancora ad uno stadio precoce, risulta necessario incentivarne l’utilizzo assumendo le già consolidate esperienze internazionali.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References/Bibliografia

  1. www.pubmed.org (PUBMED). Accessed 02/2009

  2. www.google.it (GOOGLE). Accessed 02/2009

  3. www.ovid.com/site/products/ovidguide/cctrdb.htm (COCHRANE CENTRAL REGISTER of CONTROLLED TRIALS). Accessed 02/2009

  4. www.cochrane.org/ (THE COCHRANE COLLABORATION). Accessed 02/2009

  5. www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/crddatabases. htm#HTA (HTA Database). Accessed 02/2009

  6. www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/crddatabases. htm#NHSEED (NHS Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED)). Accessed 02/2009

  7. www.euro.who.int/HEN/20030610_10 (Health Evidence Network (HEN)). Accessed 02/2009

  8. www.careonline.it: “Health Technology Assessment”, CARE n°3–4, 2006. Accessed 02/2009

  9. www.ilitalia.it/businessline/comunicazioni/pocb.asp. Point of Care Bulletin numero 4, anno III, Febbraio 2007. Accessed 02/2009

  10. www.il-italia.it/businessline/comunicazioni/pocb.asp. Point of Care Bulletin numero 5, anno III, Luglio 2007. Accessed 02/2009

  11. www.htaitaly.org. NI-HTA (Network Italiano di Health Technology Assessment). Accessed 02/2009

  12. www.inahta.org (International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment). Accessed 02/2009

  13. www.eunethta.org (European Network of Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA)). Accessed 02/2009

  14. Thornbury JR, Caldwell EW (1994) Clinical efficacy of diagnostic imaging: love it or leave it. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:1–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hunink MGM, Krestin GP (2002) Study design for concurrent development, assessment and implementation of new diagnostic imaging technology. Radiology 222:604–614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Guyatt GH, Tugwell PX, Feeny DH et al (1986) A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies. CMAJ 134:587–594

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Freedman LS (1987) Evaluating and comparing imaging techniques: a review and classification of study designs. Br J Radiol 60:1071–1081

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fryback DG, Thornbury JR (1991) The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 11:88–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kent DL, Larson EB (1992) Disease, level of impact, and quality of research methods: three dimensions of clinical efficacy assessment applied to magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 27:245–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Taylor CR, Elmore JG, Sun K et al (1993) Technology assessment in diagnostic imaging: a proposal for a phased approach to evaluating radiology research. Invest Radiol 28:155–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. www.nice.org.uk/ (NICE). Accessed 02/2009

  22. Hollingworth W, Jarvik JG (2007) Technology assessment in radiology: putting the evidence in evidence based radiology. Radiology 244:31–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Battista RN, Hodge MJ, Vineis P (1995) Medicine, practice and guidelines: the uneasy juncture of science and art. J Clin Epidemiol 7:875–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Giovagnoni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giovagnoni, A., Bartolucci, L., Manna, A. et al. Health technology assessment: principles, methods and current status. Radiol med 114, 673–691 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-009-00387-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-009-00387-5

Keywords

Parole chiave

Navigation