Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling the Mechanisms by Which Coexisting Biomolecular RNA–Protein Condensates Form

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Liquid–liquid phase separation is an emerging mechanism for intracellular organization. This work presents a mathematical model to examine molecular mechanisms that yield phase-separated droplets composed of different RNA–protein complexes. Using a Cahn–Hilliard diffuse interface model with a Flory–Huggins free energy scheme, we explore how multiple (here two, for simplicity) protein–RNA complexes (species) can establish a heterogeneous droplet field where droplets with single or multiple species phase separate and evolve during coarsening. We show that the complex–complex de-mixing energy tunes whether the complexes co-exist or form distinct droplets, while the transient binding kinetics dictate both the timescale of droplet formation and whether distinct species phase separate into droplets simultaneously or sequentially. For specific energetics and kinetics, a field of droplets driven by the formation of only one protein–RNA complex will emerge. Slowly, the other droplet species will accumulate inside the preformed droplets of the other species, allowing them to occupy the same droplet space. Alternatively, unfavorable species mixing creates a parasitic relationship: the slow-to-form protein–RNA complex will accumulate at the surface of a competing droplet species, siphoning off the free protein as it is released. Once this competing protein–RNA complex has sufficiently accumulated on the droplet surface, it can form a new droplet that is capable of sharing an interface with the first complex droplet but is not capable of mixing. These results give insights into a wide range of phase-separation scenarios and heterogeneous droplets that coexist but do not mix within the nucleus and the cytoplasm of cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All simulation data available on request.

References

  • Banani SF, Lee HO, Hyman AA, Rosen MK (2017) Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 18(5):285–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry J, Brangwynne CP, Haataja M (2018) Physical principles of intracellular organization via active and passive phase transitions. Rep Prog Phys 81(4):046601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brangwynne CP, Tompa P, Pappu RV (2015) Polymer physics of intracellular phase transitions. Nat Phys 11(11):899–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahn JW, Hilliard JE (1958) Free energy of a nonuniform system. I. Interfacial free energy. J Chem Phys 28(2):258–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong PA, Vernon RM, Forman-Kay JD (2018) RGG/RG motif regions in RNA binding and phase separation. J Mol Biol 430(23):4650–4665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudowicz J, Freed KF, Douglas JF (2004) Flory–Huggins model of equilibrium polymerization and phase separation in the Stockmayer fluid. Phys Rev Lett 92(4):045502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbaum-Garfinkle S, Kim Y, Szczepaniak K, Chen CC-H, Eckmann CR, Myong S, Brangwynne CP (2015) The disordered P granule protein LAF-1 drives phase separation into droplets with tunable viscosity and dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(23):7189–7194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feric M, Vaidya N, Harmon TS, Mitrea DM, Zhu L, Richardson TM, Kriwacki RW, Pappu RV, Brangwynne CP (2016) Coexisting liquid phases underlie nucleolar subcompartments. Cell 165(7):1686–1697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasior K, Zhao J, McLaughlin G, Forest MG, Gladfelter AS, Newby J (2019) Partial demixing of RNA-protein complexes leads to intradroplet patterning in phase-separated biological condensates. Phys Rev E 99(1):012411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladfelter AS (2006) Nuclear anarchy: asynchronous mitosis in multinucleated fungal hyphae. Curr Opin Microbiol 9(6):547–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glotzer SC, Di Marzio EA, Muthukumar M (1995) Reaction-controlled morphology of phase-separating mixtures. Phys Rev Lett 74(11):2034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult C, Adalsteinsson D, Vasquez PA, Lawrimore J, Bennett M, York A, Cook D, Yeh E, Forest MG, Bloom K (2017) Enrichment of dynamic chromosomal crosslinks drive phase separation of the nucleolus. Nucleic Acids Res 45(19):11159–11173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman AA, Weber CA, Jülicher F (2014) Liquid-liquid phase separation in biology. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 30:39–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langdon EM, Gladfelter AS (2018) A new lens for RNA localization: liquid-liquid phase separation. Annu Rev Microbiol 72:255–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langdon EM, Qiu Y, Niaki AG, McLaughlin GA, Weidmann C, Gerbich TM, Smith JA, Crutchley JM, Termini CM, Weeks KM (2018) mRNA structure determines specificity of a polyQ-driven phase separation. Science 360:922–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C, Zhang H, Baker AE, Occhipinti P, Borsuk ME, Gladfelter AS (2013a) Protein aggregation behavior regulates cyclin transcript localization and cell-cycle control. Dev Cell 25(6):572–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CF, Brangwynne CP, Gharakhani J, Hyman AA, Jülicher F (2013b) Spatial organization of the cell cytoplasm by position-dependent phase separation. Phys Rev Lett 111(8):088101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C, Occhipinti P, Gladfelter AS (2015) PolyQ-dependent RNA-protein assemblies control symmetry breaking. J Cell Biol 208:533–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y, Protter DS, Rosen MK, Parker R (2015) Formation and maturation of phase-separated liquid droplets by RNA-binding proteins. Mol Cell 60(2):208–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molliex A, Temirov J, Lee J, Coughlin M, Kanagaraj AP, Kim HJ, Mittag T, Taylor JP (2015) Phase separation by low complexity domains promotes stress granule assembly and drives pathological fibrillization. Cell 163(1):123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pak CW, Kosno M, Holehouse AS, Padrick SB, Mittal A, Ali R, Yunus AA, Liu DR, Pappu RV, Rosen MK (2016) Sequence determinants of intracellular phase separation by complex coacervation of a disordered protein. Mol Cell 63(1):72–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin R, Bhadeshia H (2010) Phase field method. Mater Sci Technol 26(7):803–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer MH, Wanker EE, Andrade-Navarro MA (2012) Evolution and function of CAG/polyglutamine repeats in protein–protein interaction networks. Nucleic Acids Res 40(10):4273–4287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen J, Yang X (2010) Numerical approximations of allen-cahn and cahn-hilliard equations. Discrete Contin Dyn Syst 28(4):1669–1691

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tetz G, Tetz V (2017) Prion-like domains in phagobiota. Front Microbiol 8:2239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Taylor D, Lawrimore J, Hult C, Adalsteinsson D, Bloom K, Forest MG (2019) Transient crosslinking kinetics optimize gene cluster interactions. PLoS Comput Biol 15(8):e1007124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber CA, Zwicker D, Jülicher F, Lee CF (2019) Physics of active emulsions. Rep Prog Phys 82(6):064601

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Zhao J, He X (2018) Linear, second order and unconditionally energy stable schemes for the viscous Cahn–Hilliard equation with hyperbolic relaxation using the invariant energy quadratization method. J Comput Appl Math 343:80–97

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Elbaum-Garfinkle S, Langdon EM, Taylor N, Occhipinti P, Bridges AA, Brangwynne CP, Gladfelter AS (2015) RNA controls PolyQ protein phase transitions. Mol Cell 60(2):220–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwicker D, Seyboldt R, Weber CA, Hyman AA, Jülicher F (2017) Growth and division of active droplets provides a model for protocells. Nat Phys 13(4):408

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Kelsey Gasior was supported in part by NSF DMS-1816630. M. Gregory Forest was supported in part by NSF DMS-1816630, DMS-1517274, and DMS-1664645. Amy Gladfelter was supported in part by NIH GM R01-GM081506. Jay M. Newby was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2019-06435, RGPAS-2019-00014, DGECR-2019-00321) and the NSF (DMS-171474, DMS-1816630).

Funding

Kelsey Gasior was supported in part by NSF DMS-1816630. M. Gregory Forest was supported in part by NSF DMS-1816630, DMS-1517274, and DMS-1664645. Amy Gladfelter was supported in part by NIH GM R01-GM081506. Jay M. Newby was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2019-06435, RGPAS-2019-00014, DGECR-2019-00321) and the NSF (DMS-171474, DMS-1816630).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. S. Gladfelter or J. M. Newby.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Code Availability

Code was created using Matlab.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gasior, K., Forest, M.G., Gladfelter, A.S. et al. Modeling the Mechanisms by Which Coexisting Biomolecular RNA–Protein Condensates Form. Bull Math Biol 82, 153 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-020-00823-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-020-00823-x

Keywords

Navigation