Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modeling Endocrine Control of the Pituitary–Ovarian Axis: Androgenic Influence and Chaotic Dynamics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mathematical models of the hypothalamus-pituitary-ovarian axis in women were first developed by Schlosser and Selgrade in 1999, with subsequent models of Harris-Clark et al. (Bull. Math. Biol. 65(1):157–173, 2003) and Pasteur and Selgrade (Understanding the dynamics of biological systems: lessons learned from integrative systems biology, Springer, London, pp. 38–58, 2011). These models produce periodic in-silico representation of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol (E2), progesterone (P4), inhibin A (InhA), and inhibin B (InhB). Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), a leading cause of cycle irregularities, is seen as primarily a hyper-androgenic disorder. Therefore, including androgens into the model is necessary to produce simulations relevant to women with PCOS. Because testosterone (T) is the dominant female androgen, we focus our efforts on modeling pituitary feedback and inter-ovarian follicular growth properties as functions of circulating total T levels. Optimized parameters simultaneously simulate LH, FSH, E2, P4, InhA, and InhB levels of Welt et al. (J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 84(1):105–111, 1999) and total T levels of Sinha-Hikim et al. (J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 83(4):1312–1318, 1998). The resulting model is a system of 16 ordinary differential equations, with at least one stable periodic solution. Maciel et al. (J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 89(11):5321–5327, 2004) hypothesized that retarded early follicle growth resulting in “stockpiling” of preantral follicles contributes to PCOS etiology. We present our investigations of this hypothesis and show that varying a follicular growth parameter produces preantral stockpiling and a period-doubling cascade resulting in apparent chaotic menstrual cycle behavior. The new model may allow investigators to study possible interventions returning acyclic patients to regular cycles and guide developments of individualized treatments for PCOS patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angelean O. Hendrix.

Additional information

Support by NSF grants DMS-0920927 and DMS-1225607.

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE-0750733.

Appendix: Parameters and Inital Conditions

Appendix: Parameters and Inital Conditions

Table 1 LH subsystem parameters
Table 2 FSH subsystem parameters
Table 3 Ovarian subsystem parameters
Table 4 Auxiliary equations parameter set
Table 5 Initial conditions

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hendrix, A.O., Hughes, C.L. & Selgrade, J.F. Modeling Endocrine Control of the Pituitary–Ovarian Axis: Androgenic Influence and Chaotic Dynamics. Bull Math Biol 76, 136–156 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-013-9913-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-013-9913-7

Keywords

Navigation