Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using the Community of Inquiry Framework to Understand Students’ Learning Experience in Online Undergraduate Business Courses

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a study that explored undergraduate students’ perceptions of cognitive, social, and teaching presences in online business courses and their relationship to students’ course satisfaction in addition to demographic variables. Student engagement has proven to be one of the main reasons for student retention and satisfaction in online courses and the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework by Garrison, Anderson, and Archer promised to provide clear structure to identify student engagement. A total of 223 business undergraduate students participated in the online survey adapted from the CoI survey (Garrison et al., The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105, 2000) with additional demographic variables. Results indicated that teaching presence and cognitive presence of the CoI framework has a significant impact on the course rate of online undergraduate business courses confirmed by the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). A moderation effect of gender on the relationship between age and course rate was also found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CoI:

community of inquiry

TP:

teaching presence

CP:

cognitive presence

SP:

social presence

References

  • Abramovich, S., Schunn, C., & Higashi, R. M. (2013). Are badges useful in education? It depends upon the type of badge and expertise of the learner. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. (2011). Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 23(2), 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2015). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradechange.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2018.

  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital learning compass: Distance education enrollment report 2017. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/digtiallearningcompassenrollment2017.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2018.

  • Alman, S. W., Frey, B. A., & Tomer, C. (2012). Social and cognitive presence as factors in learning and student retention: An investigation of the cohort model in an iSchool setting. Journal of Education for Library & Information Science, 53(4), 290–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., & Leskovec, J. (2013). Steering user behavior with badges. Proceedings of World Wide Web 2013 Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Retrieved from http://cs.stanford.edu/people/jure/pubs/badges-www13.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2018.

  • Antin, J., & Churchill, E. (2011, May). Badges in social media: A social psychological perspective. CHI Workshop on Gamification. Vancouver, BC, Canada.

  • Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). An exploratory study of the effects of gender on student learning and class participation in an internet-based MBA course. Management Learning, 31(4), 503–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in online MBA courses? The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2) Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/490. Accessed 15 Aug 2018.

  • Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 133–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armellini, A., & De Stefani, M. (2016). Social presence in the 21st century: An adjustment to the community of inquiry framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1202–1216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barczyk, C. C., Hixon, E., Buckenmeyer, J., & Ralston-Berg, P. (2017). The effect of age and employment on students’ perceptions of online course quality. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(3), 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (2002). Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 605–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston, W., Diaz, S., Gibson, A., Ice, P., Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2009). An exploration of relationship between indicators of the Community of Inquiry framework and retention in online programs. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), 67–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulu, S. T. (2012). Place presence, social presence, co-presence, and satisfaction in virtual worlds. Computers & Education, 58(1), 154–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bury, M. (2014). Community of inquiry model [Online image]. Commons.wikimedia.org . Retrieved from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Community_of_inquiry_model.svg. Accessed 15 Aug 2018.

  • Catron, S. D. (2012). An investigation of online educational quality in professional and continuing education using the Community of Inquiry framework. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (1023131849).

  • Cho, M. H., & Jonassen, D. H. (2009). The development of the human interaction dimension of self-regulated learning questionnaire in asynchronous online learning environments. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 29(1), 117–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, M. H., Shen, D., & Laffey, J. (2010). The role of metacognitive self-regulation (MSR) on social presence and sense of community in online learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 21(3), 297–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinefelter, D. L., & Aslanian, C. B. (2014). Online college students 2014: Comprehensive data on demands and preferences. Louisville: The Learning House, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, S. C. (2011). Social presence, satisfaction, and perceived learning of RN-to-BSN students in web-based nursing courses. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(2), 115–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennen, V. P. (2004). Cognitive apprenticeship in educational practice: Research on scaffolding, modeling, mentoring, and coaching as instructional strategies. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology: A project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 813–828). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denny, P. (2013). The effect of virtual achievements on student engagement. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France, (series) – CHI’, 13, 763–772.

  • Dunlap, J., & Lowenthal, P. (2009). Tweeting the night away: Using twitter to enhance social presence. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espasa, A., & Meneses, J. (2010). Analysing feedback processes in an online teaching and learning environment: An exploratory study. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 59(3), 277–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estelami, H. (2012). An exploratory study of the drivers of student satisfaction and learning experience in hybrid-online and purely online marketing courses. Marketing Education Review, 22(2), 143–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. (2017). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D., & Akyol, Z. (2013). The Community of Inquiry theoretical framework. In M. Moore (Ed.), Introducing the 2013 handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 104–120). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and socialpresence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greyling, F. C., & Wentzel, A. (2007). Humanising education through technology: Creating social presence in large classes. South African Journal of Higher Education, 21(4), 654–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horzum, M. B. (2015). Online learning students’ perceptions of the community of inquiry based on learning outcomes and demographic variables. Croatian Journal of Education, 17(2), 535–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hostetter, C., & Busch, M. (2006). Measuring up online: The relationship between social presence and student learning satisfaction. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorge, I. (2010). Social presence and cognitive presence in in online training program for teachers of Portuguese. IODL & ICEM 2010 Joint Conference and Media Days. Paper presented at the 2010 IODL & ICEM Joint Conference, Eskisehir, Turkey.

  • Kanuka, H., & Garrison, D. R. (2004). Cognitive presence in online learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(2), 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanuka, H., & Jugdev, K. (2006). Distance education MBA students: An investigation into the use of an orientation course to address academic and social integration issues. Open Learning, 21(2), 153–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ke, F. (2010). Examining online teaching, cognitive, and social presence for adult students. Computers & Education, 55(2), 808–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layne, M., & Ice, P. (2014). Merging the best of both worlds: Introducing CoI-TLP model. In B. Sutton & A. Basiel (Eds.), Teaching and learning online: New models of learning for a connected world (pp. 3–20). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lear, J. L., Isernhagen, J. C., LaCost, B. A., & King, J. W. (2009). Instructor presence for web-based classes. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 51(2), 86–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59, 593–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R., & Faulkner, M. (2011). The roles of extrinsic factors in a community of inquiry model of e-learning. E-Learning and Digital Media, 8(1), 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei, P. W., & Wu, Q. (2007). Introduction to structural equation modeling: Issues and practical considerations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26(3), 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers & Education, 48(2), 185–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Magjuka, R. J., Bonk, C. J., & Lee, S. (2007). Does sense of community matter? Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8, 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahle, M. (2011). Effects of interactivity on student achievement and motivation in distance education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(3), 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayne, L., & Wu, Q. (2011). Creating and measuring social presence in online graduate nursing courses. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(2), 110–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menager-Beeley, R. (2001). Student success in web-based distance learning: Measuring motivation to identify at risk students and improve retention in online classes (pp. 1–8). ERIC database. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED466608.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2018.

  • Moore, J. L., & Marra, R. M. (2005). A comparative analysis of online discussion participation protocols. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(2), 191–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, T. (2008). Persistence of women in online degree-completion programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, E. (2004). Recognizing and promoting collaboration in an online asynchronous discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 421–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noteboom, J. T., & Claywell, L. (2010). Student perceptions of cognitive, social, and teaching presence. 26th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning. Paper presented at the 2010 Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning, Madison, WI., USA.

  • Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relations to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. C., Koehler, A., Besser, E., Caskurlu, S., Lim, J., & Mueller, C. (2015). Conceptualizing and investigating instructor presence in online learning environments. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(3), 256–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovai, A. P., & Baker, J. D. (2005). Gender differences in online learning: Sense of community, perceived learning, and interpersonal interactions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, B., Fernandes, R., & Avgerinou, M. (2013). The effects of technology on the Community of Inquiry and satisfaction with online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 48–57.

  • Sanders, D. W., & Morrison-Shetlar, A. I. (2002). Student attitudes toward web-enhanced instruction in an introductory biology course. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(3), 251–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students (6th ed.). New York: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, P. (2006). A study of students’ sense of learning community in online learning environments. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1) Retrieved from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v10n1/v10n1_4shea_member.asp. Accessed 15 Aug 2018.

  • Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009a). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52, 543–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009b). Measures of quality in online education: An investigation of the community of inquiry model and the net generation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(4), 339–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, P., Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Pelz, W., & Swan, K. (2001). Measures of learning effectiveness in the SUNY learning network. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Online education (volume 2) learning effectiveness, faculty satisfaction, and cost effectiveness (pp. 7–31). Needham: SCOLE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, P., Li, C., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). Five facets of social presence in online distance education. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1738–1747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, K. (2004). Learning effectiveness: What the research tells us. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Practice and direction Vol 4 (pp. 13–45). Needham: Sloan Center for Online Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, K., Garrison, D. R., & Richardson, J. C. (2009). A constructivist approach to online learning: The Community of Inquiry framework. In C. R. Payne (Ed.), Information technology and constructivism in higher education: Progressive learning frameworks (pp. 43–57). Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, K., Day, S., Bogle, L. R., & Matthews, D. B. (2014). A collaborative, design-based approach to improving an online program. Internet and Higher Education, 21, 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, R. A., & Holton, E. F. (2005). Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Berrett Koehler Publications.

  • Szeto, E. (2015). Community of Inquiry as an instructional approach: What effects of teaching, social and cognitive presences are there in blended synchronous learning and teaching? Computers & Education, 81, 191–201.

  • Tinto, V. (2006). Research and practice of student retention: What next? College Student Retention: Research, Theory, and Practice, 8, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, C., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valasek, T. (2001). Student persistence in web-based courses: Identifying a profile for success. (pp. 1–19). ERIC. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED466276. Accessed 15 Aug 2018.

  • Van de Ven, A. H. (1980). Problem solving, planning, and innovation. Part II. Speculations for theory and practice. Human Relations, 33(11), 757–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, D. A., Craft, B. B., Mason, G. N., Gritter, K., & Bolding, K. (2015). An investigation into the community of inquiry of blended classrooms by a faculty learning community. Internet and Higher Education, 25(C), 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2011). Online and hybrid course enrollment and performance in Washington State Community and Technical Colleges (CCRC Working Paper No. 31). New York: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved from http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/Publication.asp?UID=872. Accessed 15 Aug 2018.

  • Zhang, C. (2010). Using virtual world learning environment as a course component in both distance learning and traditional classroom: Implications for technology choice in course delivery. Proceedings of the Southern Association for Information Systems Conference (pp. 196–200). USA.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 430A Wohlers Hall, 1206 S. Sixth Street, Champaign, IL, 61820, USA

    Jinhee Choo, Norma I. Scagnoli, Boreum Ju & Xiaoping Tong

  2. West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, USA

    Nesrin Bakir

Authors
  1. Jinhee Choo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nesrin Bakir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Norma I. Scagnoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Boreum Ju
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaoping Tong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinhee Choo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

We have no potential conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants

This study is exempted from ethical approval by ethics committee, The Institutional Review Board Office at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choo, J., Bakir, N., Scagnoli, N.I. et al. Using the Community of Inquiry Framework to Understand Students’ Learning Experience in Online Undergraduate Business Courses. TechTrends 64, 172–181 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00444-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00444-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation