Abstract
This article explores professional learning through online discussion events as sites of communities of learning. The rise of distributed work places and networked labour coincides with a privileging of individualised professional learning. Alongside this focus on the individual has been a growth in informal online learning communities and networks for professional learning and professional identity development. An example of these learning communities can be seen in the synchronous discussion events held on Twitter. This article examines a sample of these events where the interplay of personal learning and the collaborative components of professional learning and practice are seen, and discusses how facilitation is performed through a distributed assemblage of technologies and the collective of event participants. These Twitter based events demonstrate competing forces of newer technologies and related practices of social and collaborative learning against a rhetoric of learner autonomy and control found in the advocacy of the personalisation of learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ala-mutka, K. (2009). Review of Learning in ICT-enabled Networks and Communities. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, JRC, European Commission. EUR 2406.
Barad, K. (2003). ‘Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.
Bingham, T., & Conner, M. (2010). The New Social Learning. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Bradley, A. J., & MacDonald, M. P. (2011). Social media versus knowledge management. Retrieved September 26, 2013, from http://blogs.hbr.org/2011/10/social-mediaversus-knowledge/
Bruns, A., & Stieglitz, S. (2013). Towards more systematic Twitter analysis: metrics for tweeting activities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(2), 91–108. doi:10.1080/13645579.2012.756095
Castells, M. (2000). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. The British Journal of Sociology, 1(51), 5–24.
Conradie, P. W. (2014). Supporting Self-Directed Learning by Connectivism and Personal Learning Environments. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 4(3), 254–259. doi:10.7763/IJIET.2014.V4.408
Donnelly, R. (2011). The coalescence between synergies and conflicts of interest in a top consultancy firm: An analysis of the implications for consultants’ attitudes and behaviours. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(1), 60–73.
Downes, S. (2014). Connectivism as Learning Theory. Retrieved August 18, 2014, from http://halfanhour.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/connectivism-as-learningtheory.html
Evans, P. (2014). Exploring the relationship between discourse and a practice perspective on HRD in a virtual environment. Human Resource Development International, 17(2), 183–202. doi:10.1080/13678868.2014.886889
Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-Network Theory in Education. London: Routledge.
Fenwick, T., & Landri, P. (2012). Materialities, textures and pedagogies: socio-material assemblages in education. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, (December), 37–41.
Fiedler, S. (2014). “Open-sourcing”personal learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2–3.
Fournier, H., & Kop, R. (2010). Researching the design and development of a Personal Learning Environment. In PLE Conference, 6-8 June. Barcelona.
Gnosis Media Group. (n.d.). Tweetchat Wiki/By Subject. Retrieved March 28, 2013, from http://www.gnosisarts.com/index.php?title=Tweetchat_Wiki/By_Subject
Hodgson, V., McConnell, D., & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2012). The Theory, Pedagogy and Practice of Networked Learning. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.), Exploring the Theory, Pedagogy and Practice of Network Learning (pp. 291–305). New York, NY: Springer New York. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-0496-5
Kop, R. (2010). The design and development of a personal learning environment: researching the learning experience. In European Distance and E-learning Network annual Conference 2010. Valencia, Spain.
Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past ? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3).
Makitalo, A. (2012). Professional learning and the materiality of social practice. Journal of Education and Work, (October), 37–41.
Malcolm, I., & Plowman, L. (2014). Knowledge, technology and the professional learning of localisers. Professions and Professionalism, 4(1), 1–15. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7577/pp.617
Marks, A., & Huzzard, T. (2010). Employability and the ICT worker: a study of employees in Scottish small businesses. New Technology, Work and Employment, 25(2), 167–181. doi:10.1111/j.1468-005X.2010.00246.x
Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2007). When to jump in: The role of the instructor in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 49(2), 193–213. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.011
McCulloch, J., McIntosh, E., & Barrett, T. (2011). Tweeting for Teachers: how can social media support teacher professional development?
McInerney, P.-B. (2009). Technology Movements and the Politics of Free/Open Source Software. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(2), 206–233.
Mutch, A. (2013). Information and Organization Sociomateriality — Taking the wrong turning ? Information and Organization, 23, 28–40.
Procter, R., Vis, F., & Voss, A. (2013). Reading the riots on Twitter: methodological innovation for the analysis of big data. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(3), 197–214. doi:10.1080/13645579.2013.774172
Purohit, H., Hampton, A., Shalin, V. L., Sheth, A. P., Flach, J., & Bhatt, S. (2013). What kind of #conversation is Twitter? Mining #psycholinguistic cues for emergency coordination. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2438–2447. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.007
Robinson, M., Anning, A., & Frost, N. (2005). When is a teacher not a teacher?’ Knowledge creation and the professional identity of teachers in multi-agency settings. Studies in Continuing Education, 27(2), 175–191.
Rovai, A. P. (2007). Facilitating online discussions effectively. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 77–88. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.001
Scholz, T. (2013). Introduction. In Digital Labour: the internet as playground and factory (pp. 1–9). London: Routledge.
Sie, R., Pataraia, N., Boursinou, E., Rajagopal, K., Falconer, I., Bitter-Rijpkema, M., … Sloep, Peter, B. (2013). Goals, Motivation for , and Outcomes of Personal Learning through Networks : Results of a Tweetstorm. Educational Technology & Society, 16(3), 59–75.
Siemans, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1).
Sloep, P. B. (2014). Networked Professional Learning. In A. Littlejohn & A. Margaryan (Eds.), Technology Enhanced Professional Learning: Processes, Practices and Tools (pp. 97–108). London: Routledge.
Small, T. a. (2011). What the Hashtag? Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 872–895. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.554572
Wagner, N., Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2008). Who is responsible for E-Learning Success in Higher Education? A Stakeholders’ Analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 26–36.
Wang, C. X., Anstadt, S., & Goldman, J. (2014). Facilitating Group Discussions in Second Life. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 139–152.
Wilson, S., Liber, O., Johnson, M., Beauvoir, P., Sharples, P., & Milligan, C. (2009). Personal Learning Environments: Challenging the dominant design of educational systems. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 3(2. June 2007), 27–38.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Evans, P. Open online spaces of professional learning: Context, personalisation and facilitation. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 59, 31–36 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0817-7
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0817-7