Skip to main content
Log in

Prefix combinations in English: structural and processing factors

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Morphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent studies, such as Hay and Plag (2004) and Plag and Baayen (2009), provide evidence that suffix combinations in English are constrained by structural and processing factors. Two suffixes can only combine if their grammatical and semantic characteristics allow them to do so, and if the resulting combination is well processable. The present paper tests whether the same factors can account for the combinability of prefixes through an investigation of the combinatorial properties of 15 English prefixes. It is shown that prefixes are less heavily constrained by selectional restrictions than suffixes and that structural factors alone cannot explain the distribution of attested versus unattested prefix combinations. The paper provides evidence that prefix combinations are constrained by processing factors. Prefixes can be ordered in a hierarchy and this hierarchy is organised in approximate order of increasing productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams V. (2001) Complex words in English. Longman, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M. (1978). Morphological investigations. PhD thesis, University of Conneticut.

  • Baayen R.H. (2008) Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., Gullikers L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

  • Baayen, R.H., & Schreuder, R. (2000). Towards a psycholinguistic computational model for morphological parsing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (Series A): Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 358, 1–13.

  • Baayen, R. H., Schreuder, R., & Sproat, R. (2000). Morphology in the mental lexicon: A computational model for visual word recognition. In F. van Eynde & D. Gibbon (Eds.), Lexicon Development for Speech and Language Processing (pp. 267–291). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Cutler A., Hawkins J., Gilligan G. (1985) The suffixing preference: a processing explanation. Linguistics 23: 723–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabb N. (1988) English suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions. Natural language and linguistic theory 6: 527–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gansner E.R., Koutsofios E., North S.C., Kiem-Phon V. (1993) A Technique for Drawing Directed Graphs. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 19(3): 214–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giegerich H.J. (1999) Lexical Strata in English. Morphological Causes, Phonological Effects. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hay J. (2002) From Speech Perception to Morphology: Affix-ordering Revisited. Language 78(3): 527–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay J. (2003) Causes and Consequences of Word Structure. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay J., Baayen R.H. (2002) Parsing and Productivity. In: Booij G.E., Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of Morphology 2001. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 203–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay J., Plag I. (2004) What constrains possible suffix combinations? On the interaction of grammatical and processing restrictions in derivational morphology. Natural language and linguistic theory 22: 565–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn L. (2002) Uncovering the un-word: A study in lexical pragmatics. Sophia Linguistica 48: 1–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, P. (1982). Lexical Morphology and Phonology. The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm (pp. 1–91). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.

  • Lieber R. (2004) Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marchand H. (1969) The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word-formation. München, Beck

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanan K.P. (1986) The Theory of Lexical Phonology. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford English Dictionary (2004). 2nd revised edition on CD-ROM, Oxford: OUP.

  • Plag I. (1996) Selectional Restrictions in English Suffixation Revisited. A Reply to Fabb (1988). Linguistics 34(4): 769–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plag, I. (1999). Morphological Productivity. Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Plag I. (2003) Word-formation in English. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Plag I. (2004) Syntactic category information and the semantics of derivational morphological rules. Folia Linguistica 38(3–4): 193–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plag I., Baayen R.H. (2009) Suffix Ordering and Morphological Processing. Language 85(1): 109–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renouf, A. (1987). Corpus Development. In: J.M. Sinclair (Ed.), Looking up: An account of the COBUILD Project in lexical computing (pp. 1–40). London: Collins.

  • Selkirk E. (1982) The Syntax of Words. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel D. (1974) Topics in English Morphology. Cambridge, MIT

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer A. (1991) Morphological Theory. An Introduction to Word Structure in Generative Grammar. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein G. (2007) A Dictionary of English Affixes Their function and meaning. München, Lincom

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft M. (1981) Prefix stripping revisited. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 20: 289–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft M., Foster K.I. (1975) Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal behaviour 14: 638–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Zirkel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zirkel, L. Prefix combinations in English: structural and processing factors. Morphology 20, 239–266 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9151-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9151-8

Keywords

Navigation