Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effectiveness of Respondent-Driven Sampling for Recruiting Drug Users in New York City: Findings from a Pilot Study

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 14 September 2007

Abstract

A number of sampling methods are available to recruit drug users and collect HIV risk behavior data. Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a modified form of chain-referral sampling with a mathematical system for weighting the sample to compensate for its not having been drawn randomly. It is predicated on the recognition that peers are better able than outreach workers and researchers to locate and recruit other members of a “hidden” population. RDS provides a means of evaluating the reliability of the data obtained and also allows inferences about the characteristics of the population from which the sample is drawn. In this paper we present findings from a pilot study conducted to assess the effectiveness of RDS to recruit a large and diversified group of drug users in New York City. Beginning with eight seeds (i.e., initial recruits) we recruited 618 drug users (injecting and non-injecting) in 13 weeks. The data document both cross-gender and cross-race and -ethnic recruitment as well as recruitment across drug-use status. Sample characteristics are similar to the characteristics of the drug users recruited in other studies conducted in New York City. The findings indicate that RDS is an effective sampling method for recruiting diversified drug users to participate in HIV-related behavioral surveys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ramirez-Valles J, Heckathorn DD, Vázquez R, Diaz RM, Campbell RT. From networks to populations: the development and application of respondent-driven sampling among IDUs and Latino gay men. AIDS Behav. 2005;9:387–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Watters JK, Biernacki P. Targeted sampling: options for the study of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 1989;36:416–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bluthanthal RN, Watters JK. Multimethod research: from targeted sampling to HIV risk behaviors. Qualitative Methods in Drug Abuse and HIV Research, No. 157. Rockville, Md: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carlson RG, Wang J, Siegal HA, et al. An ethnographic approach to targeted sampling: problems and solutions in AIDS prevention research among injection drug and crack‐cocaine users. Hum Organ. 1994;53:279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Semaan S, Lauby J, Liebman J. Street and network sampling in evaluation studies of HIV risk-reduction interventions. AIDS Rev. 2002;4:213–223.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Griffiths P, Gossop M, Powis B, Strang J. Reaching hidden populations of drug users by privileged access interviewers: methodological and practical issues. Addiction. 1993;88:1617–1626.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. van Meter KM. Methodological and design issues: techniques for assessing the representativeness of snowball samples. The Collection and Interpretation of Data from Hidden Populations, No. 98. Rockville, Maryland: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heckathorn DD. Respondent driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 1997;44:174–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Heckathorn DD. Respondent driven sampling, II. Deriving population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 2002;49:11–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Salganik MJ, Heckathorn DD. Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling. Sociol Methodol. 2004;34:193–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang J, Carlson RG, Falck RS, Siegal HA Rahman A, Li L. Respondent-driven sampling to recruit MDMA users: a methodological assessment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;78:147–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Heckathorn DD, Semaan S, Broadhead RS, Hughes JJ. Extensions of respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of injection drug users aged 18–25. AIDS Behav. 2002;6(1):55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kemeny J, Snell JL. Finite Markov Chains. Princeton, New Jersey: Van Nostrand; 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fararo TJ, Skvoretz J. Biased networks and social structure theorems, Part II. Soc Networks. 1984; 6:223–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Des Jarlais DC, Perlis T, Arasteh K, et al. “Informed altruism” and “partner restriction” in the reduction of HIV infection in injecting drug users entering detoxification treatment in New York City, 1990–2001. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35:158–166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Des Jarlais DC, Diaz T, Perlis T, et al. Variability in the incidence of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus infection among young injecting drug users in New York City. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157:467–471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Courtwright D. Dark Paradise: Opiate Addiction in America Before 1940. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Preble E, Casey J Jr. Taking care of business: the heroin user's life on the street. Int J Addict. 1969;4:1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Curtis R. Crack, cocaine and heroin: drug eras in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, 1960–2000. Addiction Research and Theory. 2003;11(1):47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Des Jarlais DC, Friedman SR, Novick D, et al. HIV-1 infection among intravenous drug users in Manhattan, New York City, from 1977 through 1987. JAMA. 1989;261:1008–1012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Des Jarlais DC, Perlis T, Friedman SR, et al. Behavioral risk reduction in a declining HIV epidemic: injection drug users in New York City, 1990–1997. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:1112–1116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abu S. Abdul‐Quader.

Additional information

Abdul-Quader, Sabin, and Gallagher are with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA; Heckathorn is with the Department of Sociology, Cornell University, New York, USA; McKnight, Bramson, and Des Jarlais are with The Baron Edmond de Rothschild Chemical Dependency Institute, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, USA; Nemeth is with the New York State Department of Health, Albany, USA.

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11524-007-9218-y

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abdul‐Quader, A.S., Heckathorn, D.D., McKnight, C. et al. Effectiveness of Respondent-Driven Sampling for Recruiting Drug Users in New York City: Findings from a Pilot Study. JURH 83, 459–476 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9052-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9052-7

Keywords

Navigation