Skip to main content
Log in

Gambling and Gambling Harm in New Zealand: a 28-Year Case Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has long been asserted that increased gambling availability leads to increased participation and harm (availability hypothesis). It has also been proposed that over time participation and harm decrease even when availability continues to rise (adaptation hypothesis). New Zealand has national gambling and problem gambling surveys dating from the mid-1980s. They include five-yearly surveys of gambling behaviour and attitudes from 1985 to 2005 and surveys of gambling and problem gambling in 1990 and 1999. The National Gambling Study (NGS) (2012–2015) was in part designed to assess changes in behaviour, attitudes and gambling-related harm since the 1999 and 2005 surveys. Selected NGS data are examined in relation to data from earlier surveys. A national lottery, instant lotteries and electronic gaming machines were introduced during the late 1980s. Since then, gambling availability continued to increase. Participation in most newly introduced gambling forms increased markedly, usually within the first year or two, and then decreased, often substantially. Following an initial rise, contrary to the availability hypothesis, overall participation declined. This was accompanied by a decline in problem gambling prevalence. These findings are consistent with adaptation. Since 2000, while participation continued to fall, problem gambling prevalence plateaued. This finding appears to be at variance with both the availability and adaptation hypotheses. It points to the importance of factors other than gambling availability in determining problem gambling and related harm. Possible reasons for the plateauing of problem gambling in the face of substantial reductions in participation are considered. They have implications for future research and policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, M. W. (2001). Problem and non-problem gamblers in New Zealand: a report on phase two of the 1999 National Prevalence Survey. Report number six of the New Zealand Gaming Survey. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M. W. (2006). Do EGMs and problem gambling go together like a horse and carriage? Gambling Research: Journal of the National Association for Gambling Studies (Australia), 18(1), 7–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M. W. (2007). Situational factors that affect gambling behavior. In G. Smith, D. C. Hodgins, & R. J. Williams (Eds.), Research and measurement issues in gambling studies (pp. 251–278). Boston: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, R. A. (1991). Gambling and problem gambling in New Zealand. Research series no. 12. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, R. A. (1992). Frequent and problem gambling in New Zealand. Research series no. 14. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, R. A. (1996). The New Zealand National Survey of problem and pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(2), 143–160.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, R. A. (1999). Gambling and problem gambling in the community: an international overview and critique. The New Zealand Gaming Survey. Report no. 1. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, R. A. (2000). Taking the pulse on gambling and problem gambling in New Zealand: a report on phase one of the 1999 National Prevalence Survey (report number three of the New Zealand Gaming Survey). Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, R. A. (2001). What do we know about gambling and problem gambling in New Zealand? Report No. 7 of the New Zealand Gaming Survey. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, R. A. (2006). The measurement of adult problem and pathological gambling. International Gambling Studies, 6(2), 175–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M. W., Sullivan, S., & McAvoy, B. (1994). The compulsive gambling of New Zealand national telephone helpline and clinics: report on their first year of operation. Auckland: Compulsive Gambling Society of New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M. W., Williams, M., & Volberg, R. A. (1999). Seven years on: a follow-up study of frequent and problem gamblers living in the community. Report no. 2 of the New Zealand Gaming Survey. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M., Volberg, R., Bellringer, M., & Reith, G. (2004a). A review of research on aspects of problem gambling: final report. London: Responsibility in Gambling Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M. W., Williams, M. M., & Volberg, R. A. (2004b). A prospective study of problem and regular nonproblem gamblers living in the community. Substance Use & Misuse, 39(6), 855–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M., Bellringer, M., Vandal, A., Hodgins, D., Palmer Du Preez, K., Landon, J., et al. (2012). Effectiveness of problem gambling brief telephone interventions: a randomised controlled trial. Auckland: Gambling and Addictions Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology. Prepared for Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M., Bellringer, M., Garrett, N., Vandal, A., Hodgins, D., Palmer Du Preez, K., et al. (2013). Effectiveness of problem gambling brief telephone interventions: an uncontrolled outcome study. Auckland: Gambling and Addictions Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology. Prepared for Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M., Bellringer, M., Garrett, N., & Mundy-McPherson, S. (2014a). New Zealand 2012 National Gambling Study: overview and gambling participation. Report number 1. Auckland: Auckland University of Technology, Gambling and Addictions Research Centre. Prepared for Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M. W., Romild, U., & Volberg, R. A. (2014b). Gambling and problem gambling in Sweden: changes between 1998 and 2009. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(4), 985–999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M., Bellringer, M., Garrett, N., & Mundy-McPherson, S. (2014c). New Zealand 2012 National Gambling Study: gambling harm and problem gambling. Report number 2. Auckland: Auckland University of Technology, Gambling and Addictions Research Centre. Prepared for Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M., Bellringer, M., Garrett, N., & Mundy-McPherson, S. (2015a). New Zealand 2012 National Gambling Study: attitudes towards gambling. Report number 3. Auckland: Gambling and Addictions Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology. Prepared for Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M., Bellringer, M., Garrett, N., & Mundy-McPherson, S. (2015b). New Zealand 2012 National Gambling Study: wave 2 (2013). Report number 4. Auckland: Auckland University of Technology, Gambling and Addictions Research Centre. Prepared for Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M., Bellringer, M., Palmer Du Preez, K., Pearson, J., Vandal, A., Garrett, N., & Hodgins, D. (2015c). Randomised controlled trial of problem gambling brief telephone interventions: three years later. Auckland: Gambling and Addictions Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology. Prepared for Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M., Stone, C. A., Billi, R., & Yeung, K. (2015d). Gambling and problem gambling in Victoria, Australia: Changes over 5 years. Journal of Gambling Studies, 32(1), 47–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, M., Bellringer, M., Palmer Du Preez, K., Maheswaran, M., Garrett, N., Landon, J., & Hodgins, D. (2015e). An outcome study of a problem gambling brief telephone intervention: three years later. Auckland: Gambling and Addictions Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology. Prepared for Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen + Clarke. (2015). Informing the 2015 gambling harm needs assessment: final report for the Ministry of Health. Wellington: Allen & Clarke Policy and Regulatory Specialists Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amey, B. (2001). People’s participation in and attitudes to gaming 1985–2000: final results of the 2000 survey. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billi, R., Stone, C. A., Marden, P., & Yeung, K. (2014). The Victorian Gambling Study: a longitudinal study of gambling and health in Victoria, 2008–2012. Victoria: Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binde, P. (2011). What are the most harmful forms of gambling? Analyzing problem gambling prevalence surveys, Center for Public Sector Research (CEFOS) working papers 12. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogart, W. A. (2011). Permit but discourage: regulating excessive consumption. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoffel, P. (1992). Peoples’ participation in and attitudes towards gambling. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Internal Affairs. (2007). People’s participation in, and attitudes to, gambling, 1985–2005: results of the 2005 survey. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Justice and Attorney-General. (2012). Queensland household gambling survey 2011–2012. Brisbane: State of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2005). Electronic gaming machines: are they the ‘crack-cocaine’ of gambling? Addiction, 100(1), 33–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: final report. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambling Review Body. (2001). Gambling review report. Norwich: The Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Betting, & Consultants, G. (2014). Change is on the cards: technology, tourism and taxes drive global gambling. Castletown: Global Betting and Gaming Consultants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, D. (1994). On a roll: a history of gambling and lotteries in New Zealand. Wellington: Victoria University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. (2011). New Zealanders’ participation in gambling: results from the 2010 Health and Lifestyles Survey. Wellington: Health Sponsorship Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, H. G., Haslett, S. H., & Juzmicich, G. S. (2004). Confidence intervals for proportions estimated from complex sample designs. Journal of Official Statistics, 20(4), 705–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, S. (2015). Study of gambling and health in Victoria. Victoria: Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation and Victorian Department of Justice and Regulation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korn, E. L., & Graubard, B. I. (1998). Confidence intervals for proportions with very small expected number of positive counts estimated from survey data. Survey Methodology, 24(2), 193–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledermann, S. (1956). Alcoolisme, Alcoolisation: Donnees Scientifiques de Caractere Physiologique, Economique et Social. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(9), 1184–1188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lund, I. (2008). The population mean and the proportion of frequent gamblers: is the theory of total consumption valid for gambling? Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(2), 247–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Health. (2005). Preventing and minimising gambling harm: six-year strategic plan 2010/11–2015/16. Wellington: Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Health. (2007). Preventing and minimising gambling harm: three-year service plan 2007–2010. Wellington: Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Health. (2008). Raising the odds? Gambling behaviour and neighbourhood access to gambling venues in New Zealand. Wellington: Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Health. (2009). A focus on problem gambling: results of the 2006/07 New Zealand Health Survey. Wellington: Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Health. (2010a). Preventing and minimising gambling harm: six-year strategic plan 2010/11–2015/16. Wellington: Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Health. (2010b). Preventing and minimising gambling harm three-year service plan 2010/11–2012/13. Wellington: Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Health. (2013). Preventing and minimising gambling harm: Three-year service plan and levy rates for 2013/14 to 2015/16. Wellington: Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mond, J., Davidson, T., & McAllister, I. (2011). Public opinion on gambling. Canberra: Australian National Institute for Public Policy and ANU College of Arts and Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1999). Pathological gambling: a critical review. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Government. (2013). Gambling Act 2003 (Public Act 2003 No 51). Wellington: The New Zealand Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • North Health. (1996). Interim report on problem gambling management, Prepared for Committee on Problem Gambling Management. Auckland: North Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orford, J. (2005). Disabling the public interest: Gambling strategies and policies for Britain. Addiction, 100(9), 1219–1225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orford, J., Griffiths, M., Wardle, H., Sproston, K., & Erens, B. (2009). Negative public attitudes towards gambling: Findings from the 2007 British Gambling Prevalence Survey using a new attitude scale. International Gambling Studies, 9(1), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission. (1999). Australia’s gambling industries, report no. 10. Canberra: AusInfo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling, report no. 50. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Health Agency of Sweden. (2016). Gambling and gambling problems in Sweden 2008–2010: Swedish Longitudinal Gambling Study. Swelogs findings from wave one and wave two. Östersund: Public Health Agency of Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, K., & Searle, W. (1996). Public participation in and attitudes towards gambling: final results of the 1995 survey (research series no. 22). Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G., & Day, S. (1990). The population mean predicts the number of deviant individuals. British Medical Journal, 301(6759), 1031–1034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rossen, F. (2015). Gambling and problem gambling: results of the 2011/12 New Zealand Health Survey. Auckland: Centre for Addiction Research, Auckland UniServices Limited, The University of Auckland. Prepared for the Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, K. (1985). Variance estimation for complex estimators in sample surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 1(4), 381–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, M., Kraus, L., & Buhringer, G. (2011). Differences in pathological gambling prevalence estimates: facts or artefacts? International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 20(4), e83–e99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Bilt, J. V. (1997). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: a meta-analysis. Cambridge: Harvard Medical School Division on Addictions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storer, J., Abbott, M., & Stubbs, J. (2009). Access or adaptation? A meta-analysis of surveys of problem gambling prevalence in Australia and New Zealand with respect to concentration of electronic gaming machines. International Gambling Studies, 9(3), 225–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2014). The house wins. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2014/02/daily-chart-0?fsrc=scn/tw/te/dc/thehousewins. Accessed 17 May 2016.

  • Tu, D. (2013). New Zealanders’ participation in gambling: results from the 2012 Health and Lifestyles Survey. Wellington: Health Promotion Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasiliadis, S. D., Jackson, A. C., Christensen, D., & Francis, K. (2013). Physical accessibility of gaming opportunity and its relationship to gaming involvement and problem gambling: a systematic review. Journal of Gambling Issues, 28, 1–46 Retrieved from http://jgi.camh.net/doi/full/10.4309/jgi.2013.28.2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R. A., & Abbott, M. W. (1994). Lifetime prevalence estimates of pathological gambling in New Zealand. International Journal of Epidemiology, 23(5), 976–983.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R. A., Dickerson, M., Ladouceur, R., & Abbott, M. W. (1996). Prevalence studies and the development of services for problem gamblers and their families. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(2), 215–231.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. E., Abbott, M. W., & Gray, R. J. (2012). Knowledge, views and experiences of gambling and gambling-related harms in different ethnic and socio-economic groups in New Zealand. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 36(2), 153–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle, H., Moody, A., Spence, S., Orford, J., Volberg, R., Jotangia, D., & Dobbie, F. (2011). British gambling prevalence survey 2010. London: National Centre for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J. E., Bushnell, J. A., Hornblow, A. R., Joyce, P. R., & Oakley-Brown, M. A. (1989). Christchurch psychiatric epidemiology study part 1: methodology and lifetime prevalence for specific disorders. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 23(2), 215–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J. E., Bushnell, J. A., Joyce, P. R., Oakley-Brown, M. A., & Hornblow, A. R. (1992). Problems with alcohol, drugs and gambling in Christchurch, New Zealand. In M. Abbott & K. Evans (Eds.), Alcohol measuring problem and pathological gambling and drug dependence and disorders of impulse control. Auckland: Mental Health Foundation of New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildman, R. (1998). Gambling: an attempt at an integration. Edmonton: Wynne Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R., & Volberg, R. (2009). Impact of survey description, administration format, and exclusionary criteria on population prevalence rates of problem gambling. International Gambling Studies, 9(2), 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams R.J., Volberg R.A., Stevens R.M.G. (2012). The population prevalence of problem gambling: methodological influences, standardized rates, jurisdictional differences, and worldwide trends. Prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. Lethbridge: University of Lethbridge. Northhampton: Gemini Research.

  • Wither, A. (1987). Taking a gamble: a survey of public attitudes towards gambling in New Zealand. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges other members of the National Gambling Study research team including Dr. Maria Bellringer, Dr. Nick Garrett and Dr. Stuart Mudy-Mcpherson, as well as Dr. Komathi-Kolandai-Matchett who assisted in preparing the figures for this article. The National Gambling Study was funded by the New Zealand Ministry of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max Abbott.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Standard

The National Gambling Study received ethical approval from the Northern Y Regional Ethics Committee of the Health and Disability Ethics Committee on 26 May 2011 (Reference: NTY/11/04/040).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abbott, M. Gambling and Gambling Harm in New Zealand: a 28-Year Case Study. Int J Ment Health Addiction 15, 1221–1241 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9767-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9767-6

Keywords

Navigation